Clicky

Pentax 645Z vs Sony WX300

Portability
49
Imaging
79
Features
74
Overall
77
Pentax 645Z front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300 front
Portability
94
Imaging
42
Features
38
Overall
40

Pentax 645Z vs Sony WX300 Key Specs

Pentax 645Z
(Full Review)
  • 51MP - Medium format Sensor
  • 3.2" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 204800
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Pentax 645AF2 Mount
  • 1550g - 156 x 117 x 123mm
  • Released April 2014
  • Replaced the Pentax 645D
Sony WX300
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-6.5) lens
  • 166g - 96 x 55 x 25mm
  • Announced February 2013
  • Successor is Sony WX350
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Pentax 645Z vs Sony WX300: A Comprehensive Camera Comparison for Every Photographer

Choosing the right camera can be daunting - especially when two models are so far apart in size, category, and price that it might seem apples and oranges. Today, we’re putting the Pentax 645Z, a professional medium format DSLR, head-to-head with the Sony WX300, a compact superzoom point-and-shoot camera. Both serve very different purposes, yet comparing them closely reveals invaluable insights for photo enthusiasts at any level.

Drawing from extensive hands-on experience testing thousands of cameras across genres and environments, this comparison illuminates the real-world strengths, compromises, and suitability of each in diverse photography pursuits.

Pentax 645Z vs Sony WX300 size comparison
The Pentax 645Z's robust medium format body contrasts sharply with the ultra-portable Sony WX300.

The Cameras at a Glance: Specs and Design

Before diving into use cases and image quality, let's see what these cameras bring to the table in terms of core specs and physical design.

Feature Pentax 645Z Sony WX300
Category Pro DSLR (Medium Format) Small Sensor Superzoom Compact
Sensor Size Medium Format (44 x 33 mm) 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS (6.17 x 4.55 mm)
Resolution 51 MP (8256x6192) 18 MP (4896x3672)
Processor PRIME III Not specified
Lens Interchangeable (Pentax 645AF2 mount) Fixed lens (25-500 mm equiv.)
Max Aperture Varies by lens f/3.5-6.5
Viewfinder Optical pentaprism, 98% coverage None
LCD Screen 3.2" tilting, 1037k dots 3" fixed, 460k dots
Image Stabilization No (lens-dependent) Optical
Continuous Shooting 3 fps 10 fps
Weather Sealing Yes (dustproof, freezeproof) No
Video Resolution 1080p up to 60i 1080p up to 60 fps
Storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC Single SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick
Weight 1550 g 166 g
Dimensions 156 x 117 x 123 mm 96 x 55 x 25 mm
Price (approx.) $5,000+ $330

Pentax 645Z vs Sony WX300 top view buttons comparison
Control layouts showcase the professional ergonomics of the 645Z versus the minimalist shooting interface of the WX300.

Sensor and Image Quality - Medium Format Vs Compact

Sensor Technology and Size

The Pentax 645Z boasts an impressively large medium format CMOS sensor measuring 44 x 33 mm - nearly four times larger than a full-frame 35mm sensor. This sensor size is a key driver of the camera’s breathtaking image quality, offering higher dynamic range, superior color depth, and extraordinary resolution (51 megapixels).

In contrast, the Sony WX300 features a diminutive 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS sensor measuring just 6.17 x 4.55 mm. This tiny sensor inherently limits image quality but allows the entire camera to be pocket-sized with a superzoom lens.

Resolution and Detail

  • Pentax 645Z: 51 MP give professional photographers extreme detail for large prints and heavy cropping.
  • Sony WX300: 18 MP is respectable for a compact, covering everyday needs and casual printing.

Dynamic Range and ISO Performance

The larger sensor of the Pentax significantly expands dynamic range (14.7 EV DXO score) and color depth (26-bit). It also excels in low-light ISO performance, with usable quality up to ISO 4500.

The WX300’s sensor, while solid for its category, struggles beyond ISO 800, showing more noise and less tonal nuance in shadows and highlights.

Pentax 645Z vs Sony WX300 sensor size comparison
Sensor size dramatically impacts image quality and creative latitude.

Autofocus and Shooting Speed

Autofocus Systems Compared

  • Pentax 645Z uses 27 autofocus points with phase-detection and contrast detection, supporting face detection and continuous AF tracking. This system is well suited for studio portraits and landscape compositions where precision is paramount.

  • Sony WX300 relies on contrast-detection AF with fewer points, plus facial detection. It works well for casual shots but struggles with fast-moving subjects or low-contrast scenes.

Continuous Shooting and Buffer

  • Pentax 645Z: 3 fps continuous shooting - modest and tailored toward deliberate shooting rather than sports or wildlife action.
  • Sony WX300: Faster 10 fps burst, helping capture spontaneous moments easily.

Build Quality and User Interface

The 645Z features robust weather sealing - dustproof and freezeproof - making it a reliable companion in tough outdoor environments including harsh winter conditions.

The WX300 is a standard compact camera with no weather sealing and basic build quality designed for casual handling.

Ergonomics and Controls

The Pentax prioritizes professional tactile feedback with multiple dials, an illuminated top screen, and a pentaprism optical viewfinder covering 98% of the frame.

The WX300 has a simple, mostly button-driven interface without a viewfinder, relying on the fixed rear screen.

Pentax 645Z vs Sony WX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax’s high-res tilting screen outperforms Sony’s fixed panel, important when composing shots at odd angles.

Lens Ecosystem and Versatility

Pentax 645Z:

  • Interchangeable lens mount with high-quality lenses optimized for medium format.
  • Compatible with several specialized lenses, including wide-angle, telephoto, macro, and tilt-shift options.
  • Wider maximum apertures available for creative depth-of-field control.

Sony WX300:

  • Fixed 25-500 mm equivalent lens with optical zoom and inbuilt stabilization.
  • Convenient for all-in-one shooting with no lens change hassle.
  • Aperture ranges f/3.5-6.5, limiting low-light and bokeh capability.

Real-World Photography Discipline Breakdown

Let's examine how each camera fares across key photographic genres and uses, giving you practical insights based on our testing experience.

Portrait Photography

  • Pentax 645Z delivers exquisite skin tone rendition thanks to the medium format's shallow depth of field and wide dynamic range. Its selective autofocus and face detection help nail sharpness on eyes - critical for professional portraits. Medium format bokeh can beautifully isolate subjects with creamy backgrounds.

  • Sony WX300 can capture decent portraits in well-lit conditions, but its smaller sensor limits background blur and skin tone depth. Autofocus is basic, and low light face detection struggles, so portraits here are casual snapshots rather than refined headshots.

Landscape Photography

The 645Z excels thanks to:

  • Massive sensor providing ultra-high resolution for large prints.
  • Superior dynamic range capturing scenes with bright skies and deep shadows.
  • Weather sealing enabling shooting in challenging climates.
  • Broad native ISO range to adapt to diverse lighting.

The WX300 is limited here. Its small sensor can't match detail or tonal range for dramatic landscapes. Portable and easy to carry, but image quality falls short for serious work.

Wildlife and Sports Photography

  • The 645Z’s autofocus, though accurate, is slow at 3 fps, limiting its usefulness for fast wildlife action or sports.

  • The WX300’s faster 10 fps burst rate helps capture fleeting moments, but autofocus speed and telephoto reach are limited. Its 25-500 mm zoom assists in framing distant subjects but lacks professional-grade precision.

Neither camera is ideal for professional sports shooters; dedicated APS-C or full-frame DSLRs with fast-phase detection AF perform better.

Street Photography

Sony WX300 wins in terms of portability and discretion - ultra-compact, lightweight, and easy to pull out in candid situations. The fixed lens covers a useful zoom range for variable framing.

The 645Z is bulky and conspicuous, best suited for planned shoots rather than spontaneous street captures.

Macro Photography

The Pentax system with dedicated macro lenses is your go-to. Manual focusing precision paired with high resolution ensures minute detail capture.

Sony’s compact system lacks specialized macro functionality and falls short in focal length flexibility and sensor detail.

Night and Astro Photography

The 645Z’s large sensor, low noise at high ISO, and robust exposure modes make it a top performer for night and astrophotography.

The WX300’s sensor struggles in low light with noise limiting image quality after ISO 800; astrophotography is not really feasible.

Video Capabilities

  • Pentax 645Z: 1080p video recording at 24p to 60i; microphone input enables enhanced audio capture; no in-body stabilization means lens or rig stabilization needed.

  • Sony WX300: 1080p video up to 60 fps recording with built-in optical image stabilization; no microphone jack limits audio control.

For dedicated videography, neither camera offers 4K or advanced video features found in modern mirrorless cameras.

Travel Photography

The WX300’s compact size, long zoom, and lightweight design make it an excellent travel companion.

The 645Z provides professional versatility but is heavy and bulky, better suited for planned shoots rather than backpacking or casual sightseeing.

Professional and Workflow Considerations

Pentax 645Z supports:

  • RAW image capture for maximum editing flexibility.
  • Dual SD card slots for fail-safe storage.
  • USB 3.0 connectivity for fast file transfers.
  • Optional GPS for geo-tagging.

Sony WX300 shoots only JPEG, limiting post-processing latitude, and has only a single card slot.


Side by side image samples from Pentax 645Z (left) demonstrate stunning detail and color depth versus WX300 (right), which is good for casual snapshots.

Technical Deep Dive & Testing Insights

Image Quality Metrics from DXO

  • Pentax 645Z scores 101 overall, ranking among the best cameras tested, thanks to exceptional color depth (26 bits), dynamic range (14.7 EV), and low-light iso performance (score 4505).
  • Sony WX300 has no official DXO test but likely scores modestly due to sensor size constraints.

Autofocus Evaluation

Our experience with the Pentax 645Z’s 27-point AF system revealed precise focus locking in studio and daylight outdoor conditions but slight hunting in low contrast or tracking fast subjects.

The WX300 autofocus is contrast-based and contrast-detection only. It locks onto faces reliably in bright light but hunts noticeably in dim or complex scenes, which impacts street and casual use.

Battery and Storage

  • Pentax boasts about 650 shots per charge with a high-capacity D-LI90 battery, suitable for extended shoots.
  • Sony WX300 uses an NP-BX1 battery with no official rating but typically averages around 300 shots per charge.

Dual card slots on the 645Z give professionals extra security, while the WX300 has a single slot with hybrid memory stick compatibility.

Connectivity

The Pentax lacks built-in wireless or Bluetooth, expecting professional workflows to handle file transfer post-shoot via USB 3.0.

The WX300 offers built-in Wi-Fi for simple social media sharing but omits NFC or Bluetooth.


Overall performance ratings highlight Pentax 645Z’s professional edge over the casual Sony WX300.

Pricing and Value: Professional Investment vs Casual Convenience

At roughly $5,000, the Pentax 645Z represents a serious investment targeting professionals requiring top-of-the-line image quality, reliability, and a durable, weatherproof body.

The Sony WX300 retails around $330, offering casual shooters accessible zoom versatility and compact portability.

Choosing between them is a matter of prioritizing your photographic ambitions and budget.


Performance across genres: 645Z dominates studio and landscape, WX300 fits casual travel and street shooting.

Summary and Recommendations

Photography Need Pentax 645Z Sony WX300
Image quality & landscape Outstanding, medium format detail, superior dynamic range Good for snapshots, limited for professional landscapes
Portraits Excellent, natural skin tones, beautiful bokeh Casual portraits only
Wildlife & Sports Not ideal (slow frame rate) Moderate, 10 fps but limited AF
Street Photography Too bulky & conspicuous Ideal portability & zoom
Macro Excellent with dedicated lenses Limited capability
Night/Astro High ISO capable, clean images Noisy images, low quality at night
Video 1080p, mic input but no stabilization 1080p with optical stabilization but no audio input
Travel Heavy, rugged, not for casual tourism Lightweight, versatile zoom
Budget High, professional investment Affordable, casual use

Final Thoughts: Which Camera Should You Choose?

If you aspire to professional quality, unparalleled detail, and durability for studio, landscape, and fine art projects - the Pentax 645Z is a medium format workhorse that rewards serious photographers willing to invest.

For hobbyists, travelers, or those wanting an easy-to-carry camera with a powerful zoom for everyday shooting, the Sony WX300 offers convenience and respectable performance at an accessible price.

No matter your choice, I recommend checking both cameras in person if possible. Feel the ergonomics, test autofocus speed, and review image samples firsthand. Selecting a camera is a deeply personal choice aligned with your creative goals.

Want to Dive Deeper?

  • Explore specialized lenses and accessories for the Pentax 645Z to unlock its full potential.
  • Experiment with the Sony WX300’s zoom range on your next trip or street shoot.
  • Test both cameras’ video capabilities for your vlog or multimedia projects.

Happy shooting, and may your next camera be the perfect partner on your creative journey!

This detailed evaluation draws on our extensive hands-on testing and industry knowledge to help you make informed decisions - because great photography starts with the right tools tailored to your vision.

Pentax 645Z vs Sony WX300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Pentax 645Z and Sony WX300
 Pentax 645ZSony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300
General Information
Manufacturer Pentax Sony
Model Pentax 645Z Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300
Type Pro DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2014-04-15 2013-02-20
Body design Large SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip PRIME III -
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Medium format 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 44 x 33mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 1,452.0mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 51 megapixel 18 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 8256 x 6192 4896 x 3672
Max native ISO 204800 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 27 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount Pentax 645AF2 fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-500mm (20.0x)
Max aperture - f/3.5-6.5
Total lenses 6 -
Crop factor 0.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen size 3.2" 3"
Resolution of screen 1,037k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 98 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.85x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range no built-in flash 4.30 m
Flash settings Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync+Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, contrast-control-sync, high-speed sync, wireless sync -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/125 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p,24p) 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 AVCHD
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 1550g (3.42 lb) 166g (0.37 lb)
Dimensions 156 x 117 x 123mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 4.8") 96 x 55 x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 101 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 26.0 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 14.7 not tested
DXO Low light score 4505 not tested
Other
Battery life 650 photos -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model D-LI90 NP-BX1
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) -
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots Dual Single
Price at launch $5,024 $330