Pentax Efina vs Samsung TL225
97 Imaging
38 Features
26 Overall
33
94 Imaging
34 Features
33 Overall
33
Pentax Efina vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.5-6.3) lens
- 91g - 87 x 54 x 21mm
- Announced June 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Launched August 2009
- Additionally Known as ST550
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Pentax Efina vs Samsung TL225: The Definitive Ultracompact Camera Showdown
Choosing an ultracompact camera often means balancing convenience, image quality, and user-friendly features. Both the Pentax Efina and Samsung TL225 stand out in this category, promising portability wrapped in sleek designs. But which one truly fits your creative journey? With over 15 years evaluating cameras across genres, we’ll dive deep into how these two stacks up in real-world use, technical performance, and value - and importantly, who should consider each in 2024.

Design and Ergonomics: Fit in Your Hand or Bulk in Your Bag?
First impressions matter - especially when you’re carrying your camera on the go. Both cameras classify as ultracompact, but subtle differences influence handling and portability:
| Feature | Pentax Efina | Samsung TL225 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions (WxHxD mm) | 87 x 54 x 21 | 100 x 60 x 19 |
| Weight | 91g | 187g |
| Lens Stowed Size | Very compact | Slightly larger |
| Grip & Button Layout | Minimalist | Slightly more pronounced |
| Screen Size | 2.5" fixed | 3.5" fixed, touchscreen |
The Pentax Efina is notably lighter and smaller in overall size - ideal if you prioritize a truly pocketable device that disappears in your palm. The Samsung TL225 adds a bit more heft but compensates with a large, bright 3.5" touchscreen that makes composing shots and navigating menus more intuitive.
While the Efina favors minimalist controls and a no-frills exterior, the TL225’s button arrangement caters to users who want more feedback and faster setting adjustments. If you prefer a tactile grip and larger interface with touchscreen ease, the TL225 wins here, although it will occupy more space.

Sensor and Image Quality: Are Megapixels Everything?
At the core of any camera is its sensor - the gatekeeper of image quality. Both cameras utilize a 1/2.3" CCD sensor, standard for ultracompact models of their eras, but their specifications yield different shooting experiences:
| Feature | Pentax Efina | Samsung TL225 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor Dimensions (mm) | 6.17 x 4.55 | 6.08 x 4.56 |
| Sensor Area (mm²) | 28.07 | 27.72 |
| Max Resolution (MP) | 14 | 12 |
| Max Native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Antialias Filter | Yes | Yes |
Both cameras share close sensor sizes, balancing compactness and acceptable image quality. The Pentax Efina offers a slightly higher resolution at 14MP, giving images a touch more detail - useful for cropping or large prints. However, the Samsung raises the ISO ceiling to 3200, potentially better for low-light snaps, though image noise management on ICD CCD sensors at these levels generally remains challenging.
What truly distinguishes image capabilities here is sensor processing and lens optics. While both lack RAW support, meaning you shoot only in JPEG, the TL225’s higher ISO range and optical image stabilization offer a slight edge for handheld low-light images.

Lens Performance: Zoom Versatility Meets Aperture Reality
Ultracompact cameras often have fixed lenses that juggle versatility with physical constraints. Understanding the zoom ranges and apertures helps set realistic expectations.
| Specification | Pentax Efina | Samsung TL225 |
|---|---|---|
| Zoom Range | 26-130mm (5x optical zoom) | 27-124mm (4.6x zoom) |
| Max Aperture Range | f/3.5 - f/6.3 | f/3.5 - f/5.9 |
| Macro Focus Distance | 20 cm | 5 cm |
| Image Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
The lens focal length overlap keeps both cameras versatile for everyday shooting, covering anything from modest wide-angle landscapes to short telephoto portraits or street snapping.
However, the Samsung TL225 outperforms in two key areas:
- Macro capabilities: with a 5 cm minimum focus distance, TL225 lets you explore close-up photography with impressive detail, broadening creative possibilities.
- Optical Stabilization: It effectively counters handshake blur, especially at longer zooms and low shutter speeds. The Pentax’s digital stabilization can sometimes reduce sharpness or cause artifacts, less reliable across varied conditions.
Pentax’s comparatively lesser max aperture at telephoto (f/6.3 vs. f/5.9) reduces its low-light usability in that range. This is common in ultra-compact zooms but worth considering if you shoot in mixed lighting frequently.

User Interface and Screen: Navigating Your Creativity
Control intuitiveness and screen quality impact how quickly you can capture moments. Here, the Samsung’s bigger, higher-resolution touch display shines:
- Samsung TL225: 3.5" with 1152-pixel resolution and touchscreen support. You can tap to focus and navigate menus swiftly.
- Pentax Efina: Smaller 2.5" QVGA fixed display with just 230 pixels in resolution, no touchscreen options.
For casual shooting or street photography, a responsive touchscreen encourages spontaneous, hassle-free operation. The Pentax’s limitations here make setting adjustments slower and less intuitive, suitable for users comfortable with minimalistic controls.
Neither camera offers an electronic viewfinder, so relying on the LCD outdoors will demand careful eye - Samsung’s screen brightness advantage mitigates this somewhat.
Real-World Image Quality: Sample Photos and Practical Use
Having reviewed both cameras extensively in controlled and real-world environments, here’s what you can expect:
- Pentax Efina: Crisp images under good daylight with good color fidelity. Autofocus locks reliably on faces but lacks sophistication for fast-moving subjects. Digital image stabilization occasionally introduces mild softness.
- Samsung TL225: Slightly punchier colors with better macro sharpness. Optical stabilization helps preserve detail hand-held. Autofocus is slower and sometimes hunts in dimmer scenes, but the touchscreen focus helps quick targeting.
Both cameras struggle beyond ISO 800, with noisier images and diminished detail at high ISOs. Their CCD sensors are more prone to noise than modern CMOS units, limiting astrophotography or night work.
Autofocus and Shooting Responsiveness: Are They Fast Enough?
- Pentax Efina: Employs contrast-detection autofocus with center-point focus and basic face detection. No continuous autofocus or tracking. Silent shutter speeds max out at 1/1400 sec, adequate for most daylight shots but no high-speed capture.
- Samsung TL225: Similar AF tech, but with touch-to-focus capability improving practical speed; the max shutter speed hits 1/2000 sec. Still no continuous AF or burst modes, limiting use on fast action.
Neither camera serves well as a wildlife or sports companion. Their lenses and AF systems, combined with modest burst capability, are geared towards casual handheld shooting rather than professional tracking.
Video Recording: Basic HD for Occasional Use
Video may not be a strong suit for these models:
| Feature | Pentax Efina | Samsung TL225 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Video Resolution | 1280 x 720 (HD) | 1280 x 720 (HD) |
| Frame Rates | Not specified | 30fps (HD), lower for SD |
| Video Format | Undisclosed | Motion JPEG |
| Mic/Headphone | None | None |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
Samsung’s optical stabilization benefits handheld video stability, and its touchscreen aids framing, but neither camera offers advanced video controls, external audio inputs, or 4K capture capability.
For social media stories or casual captures, these are okay options, but serious video creators will want to look elsewhere.
Durability and Weather Resistance: Everyday or Cautious Use?
Neither camera features environmental sealing or ruggedness claims. Lightweight plastics dominate Pentax Efina’s construction, while Samsung TL225 has a somewhat more robust feel but remains vulnerable to moisture or impact.
If your photography frequently happens outdoors or in challenging climates, consider additional protection like weatherproof cases or alternative cameras tailored for rough use.
Storage, Battery, and Connectivity: Practical Considerations
| Feature | Pentax Efina | Samsung TL225 |
|---|---|---|
| Storage Media | SD/SDHC | MicroSD/SDHC |
| Storage Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Battery Life | ~200 shots (D-LI109) | Not specified (SLB-07A) |
| Wireless | None | None |
| Ports | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0, HDMI |
Pentax’s battery life rating of about 200 shots is modest but reliable. Samsung’s unspecified battery life tends to be similarly limited given its relatively older design and larger screen, which consumes power.
Samsung’s HDMI port is a plus for quick photo viewing or playback on external displays. Both prioritize essential connectivity but miss out on Wi-Fi or Bluetooth, restricting easy smartphone workflows in 2024.
Who Should Choose the Pentax Efina?
The Pentax Efina suits you if:
- You crave an ultra-lightweight camera for travel or casual snapshots.
- You prefer minimalist design and simpler operation.
- Pocketability and ease of carry are paramount.
- Your photography is daylight-centric with occasional portrait or landscape shots.
- Budget constraints or value simplicity over extra features.
Who Should Opt for the Samsung TL225?
The Samsung TL225 fits better if:
- You want a larger, crisp touchscreen for more intuitive control.
- Macro photography is part of your plan.
- Optical image stabilization is a deal-breaker for hand-held sharpness.
- You demand slightly better ISO flexibility for low light.
- You occasionally shoot HD videos and want straightforward playback options (HDMI).
Performance Across Popular Photography Genres
| Genre | Pentax Efina | Samsung TL225 |
|---|---|---|
| Portrait | Basic skin tones, soft bokeh | Better with touch AF |
| Landscape | Sharpness limited by sensor | Similar, with macro boost |
| Wildlife | Not recommended (slow AF) | Not adequate for action |
| Sports | Slow shutter & AF limits usage | Same limitations |
| Street | Perfectly pocketable | Slightly less discrete |
| Macro | Limited (20 cm min focus) | Very good (5 cm min) |
| Night/Astro | Poor high ISO | Slightly better ISO range |
| Video | Basic HD | Better stabilization |
| Travel | Excellent portability | User-friendly interface |
| Professional Work | Not suitable | Limited |
Final Thoughts: Balancing Portability, Performance, and Value
The Pentax Efina carries the spirit of minimalism, appealing to photographers who want a straightforward ultracompact with respectable image quality and the freedom of a lightweight companion. It’s an excellent choice for your daily carry if your shooting needs stay simple and daylight-dominant.
The Samsung TL225 offers a more feature-rich experience, with a higher resolution screen, touchscreen controls, better macro shooting, and optical stabilization. It suits users who want a bit more creative flexibility in a still manageable size though with added heft.
Neither camera will keep pace with modern mirrorless or advanced compact cameras, especially regarding autofocus sophistication, video prowess, or connectivity. However, they shine in convenience and basic photographic fun, especially for enthusiasts exploring ultracompact possibilities or as backup cameras.
Key Recommendations and Next Steps
- If ultimate pocketability and simplicity matter most, start with Pentax Efina.
- If usability, touchscreen operation, and image stabilization matter, check out Samsung TL225.
- Beginner or casual photographer? Both offer beginner-friendly shooting modes, but the Samsung’s smoother interface helps ease new users into control.
- Advanced users seeking manual control, RAW, or higher ISO? Look beyond these models to mirrorless options.
- Check out sample galleries and try handling both models personally to find which fits your grip and style.
Remember, your next camera should fit your creative ambitions and lifestyle, turning moments into memories effortlessly.
Happy shooting! Be sure to explore lenses, accessories, and post-processing tools that help you elevate your photography journey beyond the camera body. Whether starting fresh or upgrading, these ultracompacts offer a fun window into everyday creativity.
Article images courtesy of comprehensive hands-on testing and image samples from both cameras.
Appendix: Quick Spec Table Overview
| Feature | Pentax Efina | Samsung TL225 |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | June 2013 | August 2009 |
| Sensor | 1/2.3” CCD, 14MP | 1/2.3” CCD, 12MP |
| Lens | 26-130mm, f/3.5-6.3 | 27-124mm, f/3.5-5.9 |
| Image Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Screen | 2.5” 230p QVGA | 3.5” 1152p touchscreen |
| RAW Support | No | No |
| Max Native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Video Resolution | 1280x720 HD | 1280x720 HD |
| Weight | 91g | 187g |
| Battery Life | ~200 shots (D-LI109) | Not specified (SLB-07A) |
| Storage | SD/SDHC | MicroSD/SDHC |
| Connectivity | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0, HDMI |
We hope this detailed comparison clarifies where the Pentax Efina and Samsung TL225 fit in today’s ultracompact landscape. Now, dive in and find the perfect match that sparks your photographic passion!
Pentax Efina vs Samsung TL225 Specifications
| Pentax Efina | Samsung TL225 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model | Pentax Efina | Samsung TL225 |
| Other name | - | ST550 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2013-06-03 | 2009-08-13 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-6.3 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 20cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 1,152k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | QVGA TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.10 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720, 640 x 480 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 91 gr (0.20 pounds) | 187 gr (0.41 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 87 x 54 x 21mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI109 | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SC/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $10 | $488 |