Pentax K-70 vs Sony HX9V
62 Imaging
66 Features
81 Overall
72
91 Imaging
38 Features
46 Overall
41
Pentax K-70 vs Sony HX9V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 688g - 126 x 93 x 74mm
- Revealed June 2016
- Updated by Pentax KF
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 245g - 105 x 59 x 34mm
- Announced July 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Pentax K-70 vs Sony HX9V: A Hands-On Comparison for Discerning Photographers
When stepping into the world of photography gear, deciding between an entry-level DSLR and a compact superzoom can be a puzzler. Both Pentax’s K-70 and Sony’s Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V cater to different tastes and shooting styles, yet they occasionally find themselves overlapping in the hands of casual hobbyists and budding pro shooters alike. Having spent countless hours testing cameras across genres - from intricate portrait shoots to high-octane wildlife sessions - I’m eager to unpack how these two stack against one another in real-world scenarios, beyond just scratch-the-surface spec sheets. So, buckle in - whether you're a photo enthusiast budgeting carefully or a pro scouting a versatile backup body, this detailed analysis will sharpen your decision-making.

What’s Under the Hood? Size, Build, and Handling
At first touch and glance, the Pentax K-70 and Sony HX9V couldn’t be more different animals. The K-70 is a compact DSLR, embodying a robust tactile feel yet still surprisingly portable for a 2016-era APS-C camera. Its dimensions (126x93x74 mm) and 688g weight give it substance without becoming a chore to lug around. The body also features weather sealing - a real boon for landscape or outdoor specialists not afraid to shoot in less-than-ideal conditions.
By contrast, the HX9V is a classic small-sensor superzoom: pocketable at 105x59x34 mm and 245g, it's designed for sheer travel convenience. The compactness trades off on ruggedness and high-grade environmental sealing but excels in pure portability.
Looking from above, the control layout on the K-70 reveals thoughtful placement conducive to manual shooting - dials for exposure modes, ISO, and direct access to settings give you the confidence of quick on-the-fly adjustments. The Sony, meanwhile, is a touch more streamlined, with fewer dedicated controls, instead favoring auto modes and simplified menus - ideal for casual snaps but limiting when precise control is desired.

Sensor Powerhouse: Why Size and Tech Matter
Now, this is the heart of the matter - the sensor. Pentax equips the K-70 with a 24-megapixel APS-C CMOS sensor, sans an anti-aliasing filter to boost sharpness and detail resolution - a detail photographers who prize clarity will notice immediately. The sensor’s physical area is an impressive 366.60 mm², allowing more light capture, hence superior dynamics in color depth, noise handling, and low-light resiliency. Though unofficial in independent DXO Mark scoring, Pentax’s PRIME MII processor pairs well with this sensor to yield pleasing color fidelity.
On the flip side, the Sony HX9V runs on a much smaller 1/2.3” BSI CMOS sensor, measuring only about 28.07 mm². This disparity in sensor size (over 13x difference!) matters: smaller sensors mean less light gathering, often resulting in noisier images, especially above ISO 800. The HX9V compensates somewhat with a 16MP resolution, which balances sensitivity and in-camera processing but can't match the K-70’s imaging prowess.

Winning Autofocus: Speed, Accuracy, and Tracking
When testing autofocus, I lean on challenging scenarios: moving subjects, low light, and fine macro spots. Pentax’s K-70 features an 11-point phase-detection AF system with 9 cross-type points, combined with contrast detection for live view and video. It also supports continuous autofocus tracking and face detection - though it lacks Sony’s more advanced animal eye AF, this DSLR still impresses with reliable locking and minimal hunting even in dim conditions.
The HX9V relies solely on a contrast-detection AF with 9 focus points, absent advanced tracking modes or face/eye detection. It can achieve decent results in good lighting but struggles noticeably with moving subjects or indoors.
For sports and wildlife shooters, the K-70’s AF system and burst mode at 6 fps deliver significant advantages over the HX9V’s 10 fps continuous shooting - which sounds fast on paper - but without predictive AF tracking, those frames often miss the mark on sharpness during action. It's the difference between quantity and quality.
The Ideal Screen and Viewfinder Experience
Both cameras sport 3-inch, 921k-dot LCDs, but the K-70’s fully articulating screen stands out for versatility - crucial when shooting awkward angles or video vlogging. Sony’s HX9V fixes the screen in place but upgrades the display technology with an XtraFine LCD featuring TruBlack tech, which performs respectably outdoors by reducing glare.
That being said, optical viewfinders on DSLRs remain invaluable for many serious photographers. The K-70 provides a pentaprism optical viewfinder with 100% coverage and 0.63x magnification that helps compose precisely and shoot longer without eye strain. The HX9V offers no viewfinder, so you're tethered to the LCD - fine for casual shooters but a limitation for serious framing or bright sunlight scenarios.

Image Quality Showdown Across the Board
Let’s break down how these two perform when shooting portraits, landscapes, wildlife, and more.
-
Portraits: The K-70’s larger APS-C sensor shines here - realistic skin tones, smooth tonal gradations, and gorgeous bokeh thanks to the vast lens ecosystem. Eye detection AF aids sharp focus on the subject’s face, enhancing keeper rates. The HX9V produces acceptable portraits in decent light, but struggles to blur backgrounds due to small sensor depth of field.
-
Landscapes: The K-70’s dynamic range excels in capturing rich sky and shadow details, plus weather sealing lets you shoot outside confidently. Its 24 MP resolution reveals fine textures when printing or cropping. HX9V, with its smaller sensor, falls short on dynamic range and noise control in varied exposures.
-
Wildlife: Tough to beat a DSLR here - K-70’s weather resistance and robust autofocus paired with Pentax’s KAF2 mount telephotos offer flexibility and reliability. The HX9V’s massive zoom (24-384 mm equivalent) is tempting but image quality at long zoom lengths degrades noticeably, and autofocus lags behind.
-
Sports: The K-70’s 6 fps burst and predictive AF tracking deliver solid action shots for amateurs, though for pro sports shooters faster frame rates might be preferred. HX9V isn’t optimized for speed or tracking accuracy; best reserved for casual motion capture.
-
Street: Here the HX9V’s size and stealth win favor - discreet, pocketable, and unobtrusive. The K-70 is bulkier but manageable; its noise control can be better at night street shooting.
-
Macro: Pentax’s lens lineup includes dedicated macro optics and in-body stabilization enhances handheld shots; HX9V doesn’t specifically excel but can focus close thanks to optical zoom range.
-
Night / Astro: The K-70’s high ISO performance (native ISO up to 102400) and sensor-based stabilization make it far superior for long exposure and astrophotography. HX9V maxes out at ISO 3200, with visible noise creeping in sooner.
-
Video: Both shoot Full HD 1080p, but Pentax’s inclusion of mic input (versus none on Sony) favors audio quality control. K-70’s articulating display helps framing for vloggers; HX9V plays back at 60fps with AVCHD format preferred for smoother footage.
-
Travel: HX9V’s extreme zoom and size factor make it a powerful all-in-one travel companion for casual users. K-70 offers higher image quality but at a weight and bulk premium.
-
Professional: The K-70 is the clear choice, supporting RAW shooting, reliable workflows, and durability demands - with room to grow in Pentax’s lens system. The HX9V's JPEG-only capture and limited manual controls restrict professional flexibility.
Let’s Get Technical: Build, Connectivity, and Battery Life
Pentax’s K-70 offers environmental sealing (dust and splash resistant), a feature practically unheard of in its price segment at release. It uses a rechargeable battery pack rated for about 410 shots per charge, impressive for a DSLR balancing power and portability. Storage is through SD/SDHC/SDXC cards, with UHS-I support ensuring comfortable write speeds.
Sony’s HX9V lacks weather sealing and uses a smaller NP-BG1 battery, with shorter expected lifespans (exact count unspecified). Its built-in GPS tags your locations, a plus for geo-aware shooters. Storage supports Memory Stick and SD cards - more versatile but can confuse some users.
On connectivity, the K-70 integrates Wi-Fi for image transfer and remote control, while HX9V supports Eye-Fi wireless card connection (older tech, somewhat limited today). Both include HDMI and USB 2.0 ports, but none offer Bluetooth or NFC, so smartphone integration requires workarounds.
Price Point and Value: What Does Your Buck Buy?
Looking at current market prices, the Pentax K-70 commands a premium in the $650 range, justified by its superior sensor, raw capacity, controls, and durability. The Sony HX9V, priced roughly half at $320, targets casual users desiring ultimate compactness and zoom flexibility without the commitment of DSLR complexities.
It boils down to intent and budget - are you hungry for uncompromising image quality and creative control? Pentax is your ally. Want an affordable, pocket-friendly zoom to grab quick travel shots or family moments? Sony ticks those boxes.
Zooming Into Specific Genres: Who Performs Best Where?
The K-70 wins hands-down in portraits, landscapes, macro, night, and professional categories. Its larger sensor, articulating LCD, and rugged build provide a versatile workhorse across disciplines.
The HX9V fares best in street, casual travel, and convenience-driven formats. Its long zoom range and fast shutter responsiveness catch fleeting moments no SLR would want to chase in a pocket.
My Take: Which One Should You Pick?
If you’re an enthusiast or semi-pro ready to learn, grow, and prioritize image quality, the Pentax K-70 offers deeper creative latitude, superior sensor technology, and a sturdy body that will reward long-term investment. Its lens ecosystem (151 compatible lenses!) means you’re not boxed in.
On the flip side, if portability reigns, your budget is tight, and you want a quick grab-and-go option with decent zoom reach, the Sony HX9V makes a compelling case. Just temper expectations on low-light and manual control.
Final Thoughts: Trusting Your Needs Over Specs
In my years of hefty DSLR use and compact camera trials, I find that picking gear is never about spec sheets alone. It’s about marrying the camera’s strengths to your unique style and shooting scenarios. Both the Pentax K-70 and Sony HX9V have stood as reliable companions for their target audiences. Your ideal pick depends on whether you prize optical and manual control superiority with a DSLR, or you need compact, versatile convenience without fuss.
Ready to delve deeper? Test both side-by-side in a store if you can - the ergonomics alone are worth hands-on comparison. Remember: no perfect camera exists, just the best choice for you.
Happy shooting!
Pentax K-70 vs Sony HX9V Specifications
| Pentax K-70 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Pentax | Sony |
| Model | Pentax K-70 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2016-06-08 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | PRIME MII | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 102400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | 9 |
| Cross focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Pentax KAF2 | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 24-384mm (16.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Total lenses | 151 | - |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 921k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | - | XtraFine LCD display with TruBlack technology |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.63x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/6000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 6.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, flash on, flash + redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p) | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 688 gr (1.52 lb) | 245 gr (0.54 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 126 x 93 x 74mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 2.9") | 105 x 59 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 410 images | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | - | NP-BG1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, continuous) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $649 | $328 |