Clicky

Pentax K-70 vs Sony HX9V

Portability
62
Imaging
66
Features
81
Overall
72
Pentax K-70 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V front
Portability
91
Imaging
38
Features
46
Overall
41

Pentax K-70 vs Sony HX9V Key Specs

Pentax K-70
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 102400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/6000s Max Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Pentax KAF2 Mount
  • 688g - 126 x 93 x 74mm
  • Revealed June 2016
  • Updated by Pentax KF
Sony HX9V
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
  • 245g - 105 x 59 x 34mm
  • Announced July 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Pentax K-70 vs Sony HX9V: A Hands-On Comparison for Discerning Photographers

When stepping into the world of photography gear, deciding between an entry-level DSLR and a compact superzoom can be a puzzler. Both Pentax’s K-70 and Sony’s Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V cater to different tastes and shooting styles, yet they occasionally find themselves overlapping in the hands of casual hobbyists and budding pro shooters alike. Having spent countless hours testing cameras across genres - from intricate portrait shoots to high-octane wildlife sessions - I’m eager to unpack how these two stack against one another in real-world scenarios, beyond just scratch-the-surface spec sheets. So, buckle in - whether you're a photo enthusiast budgeting carefully or a pro scouting a versatile backup body, this detailed analysis will sharpen your decision-making.

Pentax K-70 vs Sony HX9V size comparison

What’s Under the Hood? Size, Build, and Handling

At first touch and glance, the Pentax K-70 and Sony HX9V couldn’t be more different animals. The K-70 is a compact DSLR, embodying a robust tactile feel yet still surprisingly portable for a 2016-era APS-C camera. Its dimensions (126x93x74 mm) and 688g weight give it substance without becoming a chore to lug around. The body also features weather sealing - a real boon for landscape or outdoor specialists not afraid to shoot in less-than-ideal conditions.

By contrast, the HX9V is a classic small-sensor superzoom: pocketable at 105x59x34 mm and 245g, it's designed for sheer travel convenience. The compactness trades off on ruggedness and high-grade environmental sealing but excels in pure portability.

Looking from above, the control layout on the K-70 reveals thoughtful placement conducive to manual shooting - dials for exposure modes, ISO, and direct access to settings give you the confidence of quick on-the-fly adjustments. The Sony, meanwhile, is a touch more streamlined, with fewer dedicated controls, instead favoring auto modes and simplified menus - ideal for casual snaps but limiting when precise control is desired.

Pentax K-70 vs Sony HX9V top view buttons comparison

Sensor Powerhouse: Why Size and Tech Matter

Now, this is the heart of the matter - the sensor. Pentax equips the K-70 with a 24-megapixel APS-C CMOS sensor, sans an anti-aliasing filter to boost sharpness and detail resolution - a detail photographers who prize clarity will notice immediately. The sensor’s physical area is an impressive 366.60 mm², allowing more light capture, hence superior dynamics in color depth, noise handling, and low-light resiliency. Though unofficial in independent DXO Mark scoring, Pentax’s PRIME MII processor pairs well with this sensor to yield pleasing color fidelity.

On the flip side, the Sony HX9V runs on a much smaller 1/2.3” BSI CMOS sensor, measuring only about 28.07 mm². This disparity in sensor size (over 13x difference!) matters: smaller sensors mean less light gathering, often resulting in noisier images, especially above ISO 800. The HX9V compensates somewhat with a 16MP resolution, which balances sensitivity and in-camera processing but can't match the K-70’s imaging prowess.

Pentax K-70 vs Sony HX9V sensor size comparison

Winning Autofocus: Speed, Accuracy, and Tracking

When testing autofocus, I lean on challenging scenarios: moving subjects, low light, and fine macro spots. Pentax’s K-70 features an 11-point phase-detection AF system with 9 cross-type points, combined with contrast detection for live view and video. It also supports continuous autofocus tracking and face detection - though it lacks Sony’s more advanced animal eye AF, this DSLR still impresses with reliable locking and minimal hunting even in dim conditions.

The HX9V relies solely on a contrast-detection AF with 9 focus points, absent advanced tracking modes or face/eye detection. It can achieve decent results in good lighting but struggles noticeably with moving subjects or indoors.

For sports and wildlife shooters, the K-70’s AF system and burst mode at 6 fps deliver significant advantages over the HX9V’s 10 fps continuous shooting - which sounds fast on paper - but without predictive AF tracking, those frames often miss the mark on sharpness during action. It's the difference between quantity and quality.

The Ideal Screen and Viewfinder Experience

Both cameras sport 3-inch, 921k-dot LCDs, but the K-70’s fully articulating screen stands out for versatility - crucial when shooting awkward angles or video vlogging. Sony’s HX9V fixes the screen in place but upgrades the display technology with an XtraFine LCD featuring TruBlack tech, which performs respectably outdoors by reducing glare.

That being said, optical viewfinders on DSLRs remain invaluable for many serious photographers. The K-70 provides a pentaprism optical viewfinder with 100% coverage and 0.63x magnification that helps compose precisely and shoot longer without eye strain. The HX9V offers no viewfinder, so you're tethered to the LCD - fine for casual shooters but a limitation for serious framing or bright sunlight scenarios.

Pentax K-70 vs Sony HX9V Screen and Viewfinder comparison

Image Quality Showdown Across the Board

Let’s break down how these two perform when shooting portraits, landscapes, wildlife, and more.

  • Portraits: The K-70’s larger APS-C sensor shines here - realistic skin tones, smooth tonal gradations, and gorgeous bokeh thanks to the vast lens ecosystem. Eye detection AF aids sharp focus on the subject’s face, enhancing keeper rates. The HX9V produces acceptable portraits in decent light, but struggles to blur backgrounds due to small sensor depth of field.

  • Landscapes: The K-70’s dynamic range excels in capturing rich sky and shadow details, plus weather sealing lets you shoot outside confidently. Its 24 MP resolution reveals fine textures when printing or cropping. HX9V, with its smaller sensor, falls short on dynamic range and noise control in varied exposures.

  • Wildlife: Tough to beat a DSLR here - K-70’s weather resistance and robust autofocus paired with Pentax’s KAF2 mount telephotos offer flexibility and reliability. The HX9V’s massive zoom (24-384 mm equivalent) is tempting but image quality at long zoom lengths degrades noticeably, and autofocus lags behind.

  • Sports: The K-70’s 6 fps burst and predictive AF tracking deliver solid action shots for amateurs, though for pro sports shooters faster frame rates might be preferred. HX9V isn’t optimized for speed or tracking accuracy; best reserved for casual motion capture.

  • Street: Here the HX9V’s size and stealth win favor - discreet, pocketable, and unobtrusive. The K-70 is bulkier but manageable; its noise control can be better at night street shooting.

  • Macro: Pentax’s lens lineup includes dedicated macro optics and in-body stabilization enhances handheld shots; HX9V doesn’t specifically excel but can focus close thanks to optical zoom range.

  • Night / Astro: The K-70’s high ISO performance (native ISO up to 102400) and sensor-based stabilization make it far superior for long exposure and astrophotography. HX9V maxes out at ISO 3200, with visible noise creeping in sooner.

  • Video: Both shoot Full HD 1080p, but Pentax’s inclusion of mic input (versus none on Sony) favors audio quality control. K-70’s articulating display helps framing for vloggers; HX9V plays back at 60fps with AVCHD format preferred for smoother footage.

  • Travel: HX9V’s extreme zoom and size factor make it a powerful all-in-one travel companion for casual users. K-70 offers higher image quality but at a weight and bulk premium.

  • Professional: The K-70 is the clear choice, supporting RAW shooting, reliable workflows, and durability demands - with room to grow in Pentax’s lens system. The HX9V's JPEG-only capture and limited manual controls restrict professional flexibility.

Let’s Get Technical: Build, Connectivity, and Battery Life

Pentax’s K-70 offers environmental sealing (dust and splash resistant), a feature practically unheard of in its price segment at release. It uses a rechargeable battery pack rated for about 410 shots per charge, impressive for a DSLR balancing power and portability. Storage is through SD/SDHC/SDXC cards, with UHS-I support ensuring comfortable write speeds.

Sony’s HX9V lacks weather sealing and uses a smaller NP-BG1 battery, with shorter expected lifespans (exact count unspecified). Its built-in GPS tags your locations, a plus for geo-aware shooters. Storage supports Memory Stick and SD cards - more versatile but can confuse some users.

On connectivity, the K-70 integrates Wi-Fi for image transfer and remote control, while HX9V supports Eye-Fi wireless card connection (older tech, somewhat limited today). Both include HDMI and USB 2.0 ports, but none offer Bluetooth or NFC, so smartphone integration requires workarounds.

Price Point and Value: What Does Your Buck Buy?

Looking at current market prices, the Pentax K-70 commands a premium in the $650 range, justified by its superior sensor, raw capacity, controls, and durability. The Sony HX9V, priced roughly half at $320, targets casual users desiring ultimate compactness and zoom flexibility without the commitment of DSLR complexities.

It boils down to intent and budget - are you hungry for uncompromising image quality and creative control? Pentax is your ally. Want an affordable, pocket-friendly zoom to grab quick travel shots or family moments? Sony ticks those boxes.

Zooming Into Specific Genres: Who Performs Best Where?

The K-70 wins hands-down in portraits, landscapes, macro, night, and professional categories. Its larger sensor, articulating LCD, and rugged build provide a versatile workhorse across disciplines.

The HX9V fares best in street, casual travel, and convenience-driven formats. Its long zoom range and fast shutter responsiveness catch fleeting moments no SLR would want to chase in a pocket.

My Take: Which One Should You Pick?

If you’re an enthusiast or semi-pro ready to learn, grow, and prioritize image quality, the Pentax K-70 offers deeper creative latitude, superior sensor technology, and a sturdy body that will reward long-term investment. Its lens ecosystem (151 compatible lenses!) means you’re not boxed in.

On the flip side, if portability reigns, your budget is tight, and you want a quick grab-and-go option with decent zoom reach, the Sony HX9V makes a compelling case. Just temper expectations on low-light and manual control.

Final Thoughts: Trusting Your Needs Over Specs

In my years of hefty DSLR use and compact camera trials, I find that picking gear is never about spec sheets alone. It’s about marrying the camera’s strengths to your unique style and shooting scenarios. Both the Pentax K-70 and Sony HX9V have stood as reliable companions for their target audiences. Your ideal pick depends on whether you prize optical and manual control superiority with a DSLR, or you need compact, versatile convenience without fuss.

Ready to delve deeper? Test both side-by-side in a store if you can - the ergonomics alone are worth hands-on comparison. Remember: no perfect camera exists, just the best choice for you.

Happy shooting!

Pentax K-70 vs Sony HX9V Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Pentax K-70 and Sony HX9V
 Pentax K-70Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V
General Information
Make Pentax Sony
Model Pentax K-70 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V
Category Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2016-06-08 2011-07-19
Body design Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip PRIME MII BIONZ
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 23.5 x 15.6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 366.6mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 6000 x 4000 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 102400 3200
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 11 9
Cross focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens mount Pentax KAF2 fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-384mm (16.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.3-5.9
Total lenses 151 -
Crop factor 1.5 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 921k dot 921k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech - XtraFine LCD display with TruBlack technology
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.63x -
Features
Min shutter speed 30 secs 30 secs
Max shutter speed 1/6000 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shutter speed 6.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 4.00 m
Flash modes Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, flash on, flash + redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync, manual Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p) 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional BuiltIn
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 688 gr (1.52 lb) 245 gr (0.54 lb)
Physical dimensions 126 x 93 x 74mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 2.9") 105 x 59 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 410 images -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery model - NP-BG1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, continuous) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I compatible) SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at release $649 $328