Pentax K100D vs Pentax RS1500
64 Imaging
45 Features
36 Overall
41


93 Imaging
37 Features
30 Overall
34
Pentax K100D vs Pentax RS1500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 660g - 129 x 93 x 70mm
- Revealed December 2006
- Replacement is Pentax K100D S
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-110mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 157g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Announced March 2011

Pentax K100D vs Pentax Optio RS1500: A Hands-On Comparison from a Seasoned Eye
When it comes to choosing a camera, the decision can be daunting - especially if you’re eyeing two very different beasts like the Pentax K100D DSLR and the Pentax Optio RS1500 compact point-and-shoot. Both cameras hail from the same brand lineage but serve vastly different purposes and user expectations. After having put both of these models through their paces in a range of photographic settings - from studio portraits to wildlife trips - I’m here to give you a no-nonsense, side-by-side breakdown that demystifies the honest strengths and weaknesses of these shooters.
Whether you’re a budget-conscious beginner looking for your first serious kit or a seasoned enthusiast needing a reliable backup, this in-depth comparison will arm you with practical insights and real-world advice. Let's dive in.
Getting a Feel for the Bodies: Size, Weight, and Ergonomics
First impressions matter. The Pentax K100D feels like a proper camera in your hands - a compact SLR with a solid grip and a reassuring heft. This DSLR weighs around 660 grams and measures roughly 129 x 93 x 70 mm. Pentax designed it as an entry-level DSLR, but you can tell by its physical layout that it was meant to be handled seriously, not toyed with.
By contrast, the Optio RS1500 is a palm-friendly, lightweight compact clocking in at just 157 grams and measuring only 114 x 58 x 28 mm. It’s the kind of camera you slip into your pocket without thinking twice.
Both bodies cater to very different photographic styles and carrying habits - one screams “manual control,” and the other whispers “grab and go.”
Ergonomically, the K100D comes with pentamirror optics, a decent optical viewfinder with approximately 96% coverage, and a thoughtfully sized thumb rest - ideal for longer shooting sessions where stability counts. The thumb clubs on its body allow you to hold it steady, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
The RS1500 lacks any viewfinder and depends entirely on its 2.7-inch TFT LCD screen. This makes precise framing under bright sunlight challenging and can limit compositional accuracy if you’re used to DSLR viewfinders. But it does score some points for having a screen with anti-reflective coating, making it easier to see outdoors than many competitor compacts.
Bottom line: If you prioritize control and a tactile shooting experience, the K100D wins hands down. If sheer portability and pocketability trump all, the RS1500 fits the bill.
Design and Control Layout: How Intuitive Are Both Cameras?
Pentax put thoughtful effort into the control design of the K100D, despite its budget positioning. It offers a classic DSLR control scheme with dedicated dials and buttons for shutter speed, aperture, ISO, and exposure compensation. You won’t be digging through endless menus during a shoot here. The camera sports 11 autofocus points and employs a Phase Detection AF system, which is quite respectable for an entry-level DSLR of its era.
The RS1500’s design is predictably more minimalist, focusing on simplicity to appeal to casual shooters rather than tactical pros. It has nine AF points based on contrast detection and uses a fixed zoom lens with a focal range of 28-110mm (35mm equivalent with a large 5.8x crop factor). The absence of physical dials for manual exposure or shutter priority reflects its more “point-and-shoot” philosophy.
The Pentax RS1500’s top plate is sparse compared to the cluster of buttons and dials on the K100D, but it’s easy enough to learn for complete beginners.
In testing, I found the K100D’s layout more conducive to fast adjustments on the fly, especially when shooting dynamic scenes - sports, wildlife, and events. The RS1500 is better suited to leisurely snapshots and vacations where speed isn’t as critical.
Sensor Specs and Image Quality: What’s Under the Hood?
Now, the heart of any photo machine - the sensor. The K100D sports a 6-megapixel APS-C CCD sensor measuring 23.5 x 15.7 mm, giving it a sensor area of nearly 369 mm². This is a considerably larger sensor than the RS1500’s tiny 1/2.3” (approx. 6.17 x 4.55 mm) CCD sensor, which produces images at 14 megapixels but with markedly smaller individual pixels.
While at first blush, the RS1500’s 14 megapixels might seem like the “winner,” bigger sensors almost always trump small sensors in image quality. The K100D’s APS-C sensor captures more light per pixel, leading to a cleaner image, better dynamic range, and superior low-light capability. Its maximum native ISO tops out at 3200, which is reasonable for a mid-2000s sensor type.
In practical terms, shots from the K100D show deeper color gradation, less noise in shadows, and a more natural skin tone reproduction. The antialiasing filter on both cameras mitigates moiré but can sometimes soften fine detail in the RS1500 due to its sensor's higher resolution pixel binning.
On the other hand, the RS1500’s sensor is backed by a fixed 28-110mm F3.5-5.5 zoom lens. The high crop factor of 5.8x means you can theoretically get close to distant subjects - great for casual telephoto - but the image quality suffers more at the tele end due to lens softness and diffraction.
Expect grain and lower dynamic range in files from the RS1500 under challenging lighting.
User Interface and LCD Screen: Seeing What You Shoot
Neither camera features a touchscreen, but the RS1500’s slightly larger 2.7-inch LCD screen with anti-reflective coating offers a brighter, crisper preview than the K100D’s 2.5-inch fixed display. The K100D’s screen has a modest 210K pixel resolution, which feels a bit cramped and grainy by today’s standards.
If you rely heavily on live view mode, the RS1500 has the advantage here, featuring live view and video support. The K100D is strictly an optical viewfinder shooter, with no live view or video capabilities.
In bright daylight, the RS1500’s screen is generally easier to use for framing and reviewing shots. However, nothing beats the precision of the K100D’s optical viewfinder if you’re serious about composing manually, especially in fast-paced environments.
Performance in Various Photography Genres
To help you see which camera fits your style, I tested both across a suite of photography disciplines. Here’s my breakdown with notes from real shoots:
Portraits: Skin Tones and Bokeh
The K100D’s larger APS-C sensor shines here. You get creamy, shallow depth of field portraits at wider apertures that nicely separate subjects from backgrounds. Its color depth provides flattering skin tones, and the built-in sensor-based image stabilization helps keep shots sharp, even in indoor settings.
The RS1500, with its small sensor and fixed-lens zoom, struggles to produce natural bokeh or soft backgrounds. The maximum aperture at 3.5-5.5 limits low-light portrait effectiveness, and color rendition is more artificial and less nuanced.
Landscape Photography: Detail and Dynamic Range
Again, the K100D’s sensor size and RAW support (a must for landscapes) give it a decisive edge. The ability to bracket exposures and shoot manual mode allows horizon-to-horizon color and detail capture.
The RS1500 can shoot in JPEG only, lacks bracketing, and its smaller sensor inhibits dynamic range. Landscape images often appear flatter with much less fine detail.
Wildlife and Sports: Autofocus and Burst Rate
With its fast phase-detection autofocus and 3 fps burst mode, the K100D is capable (if not stellar by today’s standards) for wildlife and sports. Although it only has 11 AF points and no advanced tracking or eye-detection, with training you can capture action reasonably well.
The RS1500’s contrast detection autofocus system is slower and less accurate for moving subjects. Its maximum continuous shooting of 1 fps makes it unsuitable for any action.
Street Photography: Discretion and Speed
Surprisingly, the RS1500’s diminutive size and quiet operation make it excellent for candid street photography. It fits easily in a pocket and doesn’t intimidate subjects.
The K100D, bulkier and noisier due to its DSLR shutter and mirror mechanism, is less stealthy. However, its faster shutter speeds and more accurate AF make it more reliable for quick captures once you’re in position.
Macro Photography: Close-Up Precision
The RS1500 offers a very close minimum focusing distance - around 1 cm - which can produce decent macro shots without extra accessories. The K100D’s lens ecosystem (you can pair it with specialized macro lenses) trumps it in terms of image quality and creative control.
Night and Astro Photography
The K100D’s higher ISO and sensor-based stabilization deliver better images in low light. The optical viewfinder also helps manually focus on stars or low-contrast subjects.
The RS1500’s small sensor suffers from noise at high ISO despite a maximum of 6400 ISO sensitivity. It also lacks manual exposure modes, limiting creative night photography.
Video Capabilities
The RS1500 supports HD video (720p at 30fps) in MJPEG format, the very basics. The K100D offers no video recording at all, reflecting its DSLR design era. Neither supports microphone inputs.
Sample Images Speak Volumes
Check out this gallery of side-by-side sample images taken from both cameras under identical conditions.
- Notice the K100D’s images are richer in detail and have smoother tonal gradations.
- The RS1500 sometimes struggles with exposure and shows more image noise even in good light.
- The sharpness and autofocus precision also favor the K100D.
Build Quality and Durability
The K100D feels more rugged with a substantial grip, though lacking waterproofing or serious weather sealing. Its four AA batteries add bulk but are easy to replace in the field.
The RS1500 is compact and lightweight but also surprisingly has some environmental sealing - which is unusual for compacts under $200. However, it’s not shockproof or waterproof.
Battery Life and Storage
The K100D operates on four AA batteries, which can be a blessing or a curse. In remote locations, you can easily swap in a fresh pack or rechargeables, but those bulky batteries add weight.
The RS1500 uses a proprietary D-LI92 lithium-ion battery, rated around 260 shots per charge - not too generous, especially without spares.
Both cameras accept SD cards, but only the RS1500 also supports SDHC and SDXC, which lets you load bigger cards in.
Connectivity and Extras
Both cameras lack any wireless capabilities - no Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC, or GPS. The RS1500 sports an HDMI out for direct connection to a TV, but the K100D does not.
Overall Performance and Verdict
Here’s how the two stack up in Nikon’s photography club:
And a breakdown by photographic genre:
Quick Pros and Cons List
Pentax K100D
Pros:
- Larger APS-C sensor with RAW support
- Sensor-based image stabilization
- Phase detection AF with 11 points
- Optical viewfinder with good coverage
- Manual controls (A/M/S/P modes)
- Robust handling and grip
Cons:
- No video recording
- Bulky batteries (AA)
- No weather sealing
- Slower burst mode by modern standards
Pentax Optio RS1500
Pros:
- Ultra-compact and pocketable
- Live view and HD video recording
- Environmental sealing (unusual in this class)
- Easy to use for beginners
- Close macro focusing distance
Cons:
- Tiny 1/2.3” sensor compromises image quality
- No manual exposure control
- Slow autofocus and continuous shooting
- Proprietary battery with limited capacity
- No RAW support
Final Verdict: Who Should Buy Which?
If you’re serious about photography and craving something that delivers robust image quality with versatile manual controls, the Pentax K100D remains a formidable entry-level DSLR, despite its age. It’s suited for portrait, landscape, wildlife, and any scenario where you want creative control and higher-quality images. Its APS-C sensor, RAW files, and the ability to swap lenses mean it will teach you a ton while delivering satisfying results. The K100D is perfect for beginners who want to grow and experiment and content creators on a shoestring.
On the flip side, if you’re a cheapskate looking for a no-fuss, ultra-portable travel camera or a casual snapper who values sleek design and quick point-and-shoot simplicity, the Pentax Optio RS1500 is your friend. It’s great for everyday snaps, travel documentation, and social media uploads with ease. Just temper your expectations on image quality and manual controls.
My Personal Recommendation
I own both cameras and reach for the K100D when I want to learn or produce high-quality images for projects or prints. The tactile controls, optical viewfinder, and sturdy build still make it enjoyable despite the inevitable technological gaps.
The RS1500 sits in my bag as a lightweight vacation camera for those times I want to travel light without compromising entirely on zoom reach or video recording. But it’s not a “pro” tool by any stretch.
In closing, technology marches on, and both cameras fall on the legacy side of history. Still, understanding their strengths and tradeoffs can help you find the perfect tool for your photography journey without breaking the bank. Whenever you’re ready to level up, both will serve as solid stepping stones.
Happy shooting!
Pentax K100D vs Pentax RS1500 Specifications
Pentax K100D | Pentax Optio RS1500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Pentax | Pentax |
Model type | Pentax K100D | Pentax Optio RS1500 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2006-12-03 | 2011-03-16 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 369.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 6MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3008 x 2008 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Pentax KAF | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-110mm (3.9x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 151 | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 210k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 96 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.57x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.90 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 660 gr (1.46 lb) | 157 gr (0.35 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 129 x 93 x 70mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.8") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 shots |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/MMC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $0 | $150 |