Pentax E90 vs Sony RX10
94 Imaging
33 Features
11 Overall
24
58 Imaging
50 Features
76 Overall
60
Pentax E90 vs Sony RX10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 32-95mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 145g - 102 x 59 x 25mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-200mm (F2.8) lens
- 813g - 129 x 88 x 102mm
- Released March 2014
- Newer Model is Sony RX10 II
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Pentax Optio E90 vs Sony RX10: A Hands-On Comparison for Enthusiasts and Pros
Choosing your next camera can feel like wandering a jungle of specs, buzzwords, and confusing marketing claims. Having personally tested thousands of cameras over the past 15 years, I find that the real magic lies in how they perform in day-to-day shooting, not just lab charts. Today, we’re tackling two quite different cameras: the Pentax Optio E90 (a budget-friendly small sensor compact from 2010) and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 (a relatively beefy large sensor superzoom from 2014). This comparison isn’t just about megapixels or frame rates; it’s about how these machines feel in your hand, how they tackle different photography genres, and whether they meet your practical needs as an enthusiast or professional considering budget constraints.
Let’s dig into what makes each camera tick, with real-world insights, technical know-how, and a candid eye on value. Spoiler: These two sit worlds apart, yet both hold tiny charms for specific niches. Buckle up for a 2500-word deep dive covering everything from portraiture to astro, with a healthy dose of hands-on wisdom.
Size, Ergonomics & Feel: The Bulky Bridge vs The Pocketable Compact
Before you care about sensors and lenses, it’s crucial the camera feels right. Ergonomics make a bigger difference in how you shoot than you might think. The Pentax E90 is a distinctly petite companion, aimed at the casual ‘point-and-shooter’ crowd with simple controls and a plastic body. The Sony RX10, on the other hand, grabs a hefty chunk of your backpack or neck with a DSLR-like grip and robust construction.

In terms of dimensions:
- Pentax E90: 102 × 59 × 25 mm, weighing around 145 grams (2xAA batteries included)
- Sony RX10: 129 × 88 × 102 mm, tipping the scales at 813 grams (with its NP-FW50 battery)
If you’re a minimalist or a cheapskate looking for ultra-portability and ease, the E90’s compact shell and AA battery convenience may appeal. However, the RX10’s ergonomics provide clubs for thumbs: a deep grip, dedicated dials, and a more substantial feel - all essential for those long shooting sessions or controlling a complex shot.
The RX10’s build quality is also bolstered by partial weather sealing, a welcome feature when shooting outdoors in challenging conditions, where the E90 offers no environmental protections whatsoever.
The control layout further complements this “big camera” vibe:

Sony’s layout excels in offering accessible buttons and customizability, while the E90 keeps things simple - there’s no aperture priority, shutter priority, or manual controls here.
Sensor Technology: From Small-Sensor JPEGs to Large-Sensor RAW Files
Sensor size and quality are the often overlooked core of image quality. The E90 packs a 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor of about 27.7 mm² surface area - typical of compact cameras of its era - while the RX10 sports a 1-inch BSI-CMOS sensor nearly four times larger, at 116.2 mm².

This drastic jump in sensor size translates into several palpable benefits for the RX10:
- Higher resolution: 20MP (5472x3648) native vs 10MP (3648x2736) in E90
- Better dynamic range: Sony offers approximately 12.6 EV DR vs unknown/lower for Pentax’s small CCD
- Improved color depth: 22.9-bit vs untested but limited E90 performance
- Much higher ISO usability: RX10 native up to ISO 12,800 (boosted 25,600), E90 peaks at ISO 3200 but with noisy results beyond 400-800
In daily terms, the RX10’s sensor power means cleaner images in low light, richer shadows, better highlight retention, and more flexibility in post-processing thanks to raw format support (which the E90 lacks entirely). The smaller sensor and lack of raw support in the E90 restrict it to JPEG output, limiting dynamic range and editing latitude.
The LCD and Viewfinder Experience: Composing and Reviewing Your Shots
For any photographer, the way you compose and check your images is pivotal. The Pentax E90 features a fixed 2.7-inch LCD with a modest 230k-dot resolution - serviceable but hardly inspiring. The RX10 steps this up substantially with a 3-inch 1290k-dot WhiteMagic tilting screen that excels in bright conditions. Plus, it sports a sharp 1440k-dot electronic viewfinder covering 100% of the frame with 0.7× magnification.

Having tactile eye-level framing is hugely underrated, especially outdoors or when shooting action - something the Pentax E90’s composite design (no viewfinder at all) doesn’t offer. I found myself squinting on the Pentax screen under bright sunlight or trying to balance the camera awkwardly, while the RX10 proved far more comfortable for precise framing.
If you’re a street photographer or someone who wants quick, exact compositions, the RX10’s viewfinder is a major advantage. The Pentax’s simplistic LCD might suffice for vacation snapshots but quickly shows its limits under more demanding conditions.
Lens Quality, Zoom Range, and Aperture: Versatility vs Simplicity
Both cameras have fixed lenses, so what they offer optically is fixed - literally! The Pentax E90 comes with a modest 32-95 mm equivalent zoom (3x), variable aperture f/3.1–5.9, making it decent for casual daylight shooting but limited in low light or shallow depth of field scenarios.
The RX10 packs a more ambitious 24-200 mm (8.3x) zoom - a workhorse range suitable for everything from wide landscapes to medium telephoto portraits and some wildlife. What sets it apart further is a constant, fast f/2.8 aperture throughout the entire zoom range, which is rare in bridge cameras.
Here’s my takeaway:
- The RX10’s lens enables much superior background separation (better bokeh due to larger sensor + f/2.8) crucial for portraits or pushing subject isolation.
- Its superzoom range opens doors to wildlife and travel candid shots without lugging extra lenses.
- The Pentax’s small aperture and narrow zoom range are fine for snapshotting but frustrating if you want creative control or low light versatility.
Autofocus Systems: Eyes on the Prize
The Pentax E90’s autofocus is about as basic as it gets: 3 contrast detection points, no face or eye detection, and no continuous or tracking modes. If you photograph anything moving quickly or want sharp focus on eyes, this camera will test your patience.
The Sony RX10 brings a more modern contrast-detection AF with 25 focus points, face detection, and continuous AF for moving subjects. Despite lacking phase detection, I found its accuracy solid in my testing. Eye autofocus wasn’t available (this predated the AF revolution), but the multi-area AF and face detection help keep subjects sharp even in bursts.
For wildlife or sports:
- RX10 can hit up to 10fps burst speed, tracking focus reliably.
- E90 has no continuous shooting mode (pretty much instant death in action shooting).
From a practical standpoint, the RX10’s autofocus system is miles ahead - a must for any enthusiast dealing with dynamic subjects.
Photography in Practice: Which Genres Suit Which Camera?
Let’s see how these cameras hold up across photography styles I know many readers care about - after all, specs are useful, but real-world performance tells the story.
Portrait Photography
- RX10: Excellent skin tone renditions with the 1-inch sensor’s color depth and BSI tech. Bokeh is smooth at f/2.8, allowing nice separation in tight headshots. Eye detection helps ensure sharpness.
- E90: Small sensor and slow aperture limit subject isolation and background blur. Skin tones can feel flat, and lack of face detection autofocus is frustrating.
Winner: Sony RX10 by a long shot.
Landscape Photography
- RX10: High resolution and wide zoom let you capture crisp, detailed vistas. The steady f/2.8 aperture isn’t critical here, but weather sealing is a plus in unpredictable outdoor hiking conditions. The 1-inch sensor yields cleaner shadows and highlights.
- E90: 10MP at limited dynamic range and small sensor reduce image quality for large prints or heavy cropping. Lens doesn’t get very wide for expansive views.
Winner: Sony RX10 again, though E90 might work for casual snapshots.
Wildlife Photography
- RX10: The combination of an 8.3x zoom, fast aperture, and 10fps burst makes the RX10 a surprisingly capable wildlife camera for its class. Autofocus is fast enough for moderate action.
- E90: Simply not built for this. Limited zoom, slow AF, and no continuous shooting renders it ineffective.
Winner: Sony RX10 hands down.
Sports Photography
- RX10: Offers solid high-speed shooting with continuous AF and fast shutter speeds. It can manage lower light action better thanks to larger sensors and stabilization.
- E90: No continuous mode and slow focusing means you’ll miss all but the most static moments.
Winner: Sony RX10 clearly.
Street Photography
Here’s where the E90’s diminutive size could be a small advantage for discretion - but only if you can forgive image quality compromises.
- E90: Pocketable and inconspicuous, but poor low-light performance may limit evening outings.
- RX10: Larger, heavier, and may attract more attention, but excellent high ISO results and precise AF give you better shots overall.
For stealth, E90 wins. For actual usable images, RX10 dominates.
Macro Photography
- E90: Has a dedicated macro mode with minimum focus distance of 6cm, useful for casual close-ups.
- RX10: No dedicated macro range but capable of close focusing enough for decent macro shots; plus optical image stabilization aids sharpness.
Both offer modest performance but the RX10’s more advanced focusing is a plus.
Night and Astro Photography
- RX10: Large sensor, high ISO range, and manual exposure controls make it suitable for moonlit or starry skies - though not truly specialized astro gear.
- E90: Lacks manual exposure modes and high ISO usability for night work.
Clearly, RX10 is the pick here.
Video Capabilities
- E90: Max 720p at 15fps - quite limited and choppy.
- RX10: Full HD 1080p at 60fps with built-in mic/headphone ports and optical image stabilization - viable for serious video creation.
In this department, the RX10 is a proper hybrid.
Travel Photography
Here, the conversation matters most to the “enthusiast on the go.”
- E90: Very small, pocketable, runs on cheap AA batteries - you can get replacements worldwide easily. Good for casual snapshots with limited effort.
- RX10: Heavier, but versatile zoom covers most scenarios from wide street scenes to telephoto wildlife; battery lasts for ~420 shots but proprietary NP-FW50 batteries mean bringing spares if on the road.
If convenience and weight are your top priorities and you shoot casual memories, E90 will suffice. But if you want quality and versatility in one travel companion, the RX10 shines.
Professional Work and Workflow Integration
- E90: No raw support, no manual exposure control, very limited autofocus options - not suitable for demanding workflows.
- RX10: Raw support, manual modes including shutter and aperture priority, exposure compensation, and solid connectivity (Wi-Fi, NFC, HDMI) make it integratable into professional workflows - albeit limited compared to interchangeable lens systems.
Professionals can use RX10 for lightweight assignments or as a backup, but wouldn’t rely on the E90 beyond basic documentation.
Build Quality, Weather Sealing, and Reliability
For any serious shooter, durability is key.
- Pentax E90: Plastic body, no weather sealing. It’s a casual camera, easy to damage in tough conditions.
- Sony RX10: Solid SLR-like body with weather sealing means you can brave light rain or dusty trails without worry.
Longevity and resilience go to the RX10.
Connectivity and Storage
Storage-wise:
- Both use SD cards; RX10 supports SDXC and Memory Stick Duo formats.
- RX10 has built-in Wi-Fi and NFC for wireless transfer; E90 lacks any wireless communication.
Connectivity tips the scales in favor of RX10 for modern workflows.
Battery Life and Power Options
The Pentax’s use of common AA batteries is a double-edged sword: excellent for easy swaps but often inferior battery life requiring multiple packs.
The Sony RX10’s NP-FW50 lithium-ion battery lasts for roughly 420 shots - reasonable but requires carrying a charger or spares on longer trips.
Price and Value: What You’re Really Paying For
At launch and even looking used today:
- Pentax Optio E90: Around $100 – extremely budget level.
- Sony RX10: Around $700 – mid-to-upper tier bridge camera price.
Are you getting seven times more camera for seven times the cost? Yes, with the RX10 you step into a world of possibility and image quality the E90 simply cannot touch. But if you’re a careful shopper or need a backup camera for casual use, the E90’s dirt-cheap price makes it a no-brainer.
Sample Image Comparison
Enough talk - here’s how images from these cameras stack up side by side in a variety of lighting and subject conditions:
Note the noticeably better sharpness, dynamic range, and color depth in RX10 files versus softness and noise in E90 shots.
Performance Ratings and Genre Scores
Here are overall scores to summarize performance (compiled from hands-on tests and standardized metrics):
And more detailed analysis by photography type:
The Sony RX10 excels across virtually every genre, while the Pentax E90 shines only in the most casual or beginner niches.
Pros and Cons at a Glance
Pentax Optio E90
Pros:
- Very compact and lightweight
- Very inexpensive (great for beginners or backup)
- Easy to use for casual snapshots
- Runs on AA batteries (easy replacements worldwide)
Cons:
- Small, noisy CCD sensor with limited dynamic range
- No raw format support
- No manual controls or advanced autofocus
- Poor low-light and video capabilities
- No viewfinder, low-res screen
Sony Cyber-shot RX10
Pros:
- Large 1-inch BSI CMOS sensor delivering excellent image quality
- Constant bright f/2.8 zoom lens (24-200mm equiv)
- Fast autofocus with face detection and 10fps shooting
- Raw support and full manual exposure modes
- Bright electronic viewfinder and tilting high-res LCD
- Optical image stabilization and weather sealing
- Robust video specs including mic/headphone ports
- Wireless connectivity included
Cons:
- Heavier and bulkier - less discreet
- More expensive (around $700)
- Proprietary battery means carrying spares if traveling long
Final Verdict: Who Should Choose Which Camera?
If you are a casual user, beginner, or cheapskate needing a pocketable, no-frills camera for simple snapshots, low cost is your dominant factor, and convenience rules - the Pentax E90 is your basic buddy. It’s not going to wow you, but it holds its own as an impulse camera or travel backup for light use.
For enthusiasts, serious hobbyists, and even pros seeking a one-camera-does-all bridge-style travel or semi-pro shooter, the Sony RX10 is the clear winner. Its sensor quality, versatile fast zoom lens, manual controls, and professional features position it well beyond any budget compact. It’s a powerful tool that will reward your investment with superior images across every genre - from weddings to landscapes, wildlife to video assignments.
Personal Recommendation Based on Use Case
- Portrait and Studio Work: Sony RX10 - great skin tones and shallow depth of field with a sharp lens.
- Landscape and Travel: Sony RX10 for image quality and weather sealing; Pentax E90 only if weight and price trump quality.
- Wildlife and Sports: Sony RX10 only, given burst rate and AF.
- Street and Everyday Carry: E90 if stealth is paramount, but RX10 if image quality matters more.
- Video Production: Sony RX10 without question.
- Backup / Emergency Camera: Pentax E90 because it won’t break the bank.
Closing Thoughts
Despite occupying two different realms of camera design philosophy and capability, comparing the Pentax Optio E90 and Sony RX10 side by side is a great exercise in understanding the value of sensor size, lens speed, and professional features. The E90 is a relic in 2024’s terms - simple, compact, and cheap. The RX10, though older now, remains a remarkable powerhouse for one-camera versatility.
If your budget can absorb it and you want creative control, lavished IQ, and future-proof features - don’t hesitate to invest in the RX10 or its newer iterations.
I hope this honest, hands-on comparison equips you to make an informed decision tailored to your photography journey. Remember, there’s no “one size fits all” camera; it’s about knowing what trade-offs you are willing to make. Happy shooting!
Want help picking lenses or accessories for your new RX10? Drop me a line - I’ve got clubs for your thumbs and tips for your creativity!
Pentax E90 vs Sony RX10 Specifications
| Pentax Optio E90 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Pentax | Sony |
| Model type | Pentax Optio E90 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-01-25 | 2014-03-20 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Prime | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 32-95mm (3.0x) | 24-200mm (8.3x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 6cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 1,290k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | WhiteMagic |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 10.20 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 145 grams (0.32 lbs) | 813 grams (1.79 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 25mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 129 x 88 x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 69 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.9 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 474 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 420 shots |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $100 | $698 |