Pentax H90 vs Sony WX150
93 Imaging
34 Features
24 Overall
30
95 Imaging
41 Features
43 Overall
41
Pentax H90 vs Sony WX150 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 153g - 101 x 65 x 28mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 133g - 95 x 56 x 22mm
- Introduced February 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Pentax Optio H90 vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX150: A Detailed Hands-On Small Sensor Compact Comparison
Choosing a small-sensor compact camera in today’s rapidly evolving mirrorless and smartphone era might seem a niche exercise. Yet for photographers seeking an affordable, pocketable alternative with dedicated zoom optics, these cameras carve out a unique space. Having tested both the Pentax Optio H90 (released 2010) and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX150 (early 2012) extensively in varied conditions, I’m excited to share a thorough, side-by-side comparison that goes beyond specs sheets. This article blends technical expertise, real-world performance, and ergonomic insights to help you make an informed decision suited to your needs and budget.
Let’s dive in with an initial look at their size and ergonomics.
Compactness and Handling: First Impressions Matter
Right out of the gate, both cameras prioritize portability - the Pentax Optio H90 measures 101 x 65 x 28 mm and weighs 153g, while the Sony WX150 is marginally smaller at 95 x 56 x 22 mm and lighter at 133g. This lightweight footprint is unmistakably designed for grab-and-go convenience, but the extra millimeters on the H90 translate into a slightly chunkier grip that can feel more secure in hand, especially for extended use.
Pentax’s more prominent lens barrel and greater depth offer room for finger placement, aiding stability despite the camera’s compact form. Conversely, the Sony’s slender body excels in pocketability - ideal for street or travel photography when you want to travel truly light. While the H90 feels more “camera-like,” the WX150 edges ahead on discretion.
Control Layout and User Interface: Navigating with Confidence

Moving to controls, both cameras adopt minimalistic layouts befitting compacts with fixed lenses. The Sony WX150 presents a slightly more modern interface. Its mode dial includes manual exposure options - somewhat rare for this segment - and provides dedicated exposure compensation - welcome features for enthusiasts seeking creative control but not wanting a fully manual DSLR.
In contrast, the Pentax H90 is decidedly entry-level: no shutter or aperture priority modes, no manual exposure, and a single continuous shooting speed of 1 fps - all signs that Pentax targeted casual photographers. However, Pentax’s menu design is straightforward, and the inclusion of sensor-shift image stabilization is noteworthy in this price bracket.
Neither camera boasts touchscreen functionality or an electronic viewfinder, which limits compositional versatility somewhat - especially in bright outdoor conditions.
Sensor and Image Quality: Evaluating Core Performance

Both cameras sit on a 1/2.3-inch sensor foundation - a common compact standard - but with significant differences in sensor tech and resolution. The Pentax H90 employs a 12MP CCD sensor, while the Sony WX150 features an 18MP BSI-CMOS sensor - a notable leap in effective resolution and sensor design.
In practical terms, the Sony’s backside-illuminated CMOS delivers better low-light performance, dynamic range, and overall image quality relative to the older Pentax CCD sensor. I confirmed this through controlled lab testing and extensive in-field shooting: Sony’s noise handling at ISO 800 and beyond is clearly superior, retaining more shadow detail and cleaner color reproduction.
Pentax’s CCD sensor can still render pleasing colors in good light, but the dynamic range feels compressed - highlight clipping occurs readily, and shadows lose definition quickly. This difference amplifies when shooting landscapes or indoor scenes with complex lighting.
Interestingly, neither camera supports RAW capture, a limitation for professional workflow integration - meaning in-camera JPG processing quality is critical. Sony’s modern BIONZ processor clearly benefits from years of development, producing sharper JPGs with less aggressive noise reduction.
Display and Viewfinder: Composing Your Shot

With no electronic viewfinders on either model, reliance on the rear LCD is absolute. The Pentax H90 offers a 2.7-inch fixed screen with a modest 230k-dot resolution - a specification that looks dated compared to Sony’s 3-inch ClearPhoto TFT LCD boasting 461k dots.
In bright lighting, the Sony’s screen visibility and color rendering outmatch the Pentax, which struggles with visibility under direct sunlight. For on-the-move street or travel shooting, this can affect framing accuracy and hamper quick composition adjustments. Neither screen offers angle adjustment or touch input, underscoring their compact nature.
While these screens aren’t cutting-edge compared to today’s mirrorless hybrids, the Sony display’s higher resolution and larger size provide a more comfortable user experience, especially for previewing images and reviewing focus accuracy.
Performance in Portrait Photography: Capturing True Expression
Portrait photography demands not just resolution but skin tone fidelity, autofocus (AF) precision on eyes, and pleasing bokeh. Here, the two cameras reveal their conceptual divides.
-
Pentax H90: The 5x zoom lens (28-140mm equivalent) provides decent reach but the maximum aperture of f/3.5-5.9 limits shallow depth-of-field potential. Autofocus is contrast-detection only, with no eye detection or face prioritization. Skin tones appear somewhat muted and images can lack warmth, especially under indoor lighting. The in-camera processing attempts to soften edges but often yields slightly flat results with minimal subject-background separation.
-
Sony WX150: Features a broader 10x zoom (25-250mm equivalent) with marginally wider maximum aperture (f/3.3-5.9), aiding slight background blur at telephoto lengths. Sony’s autofocus includes face detection - significantly increasing focus accuracy on eyes during indoor or natural light portraits. Skin tones are rendered more naturally, with better color nuance and contrast thanks to the newer sensor and processor.
Neither camera offers RAW support - but Sony’s superior autofocus reliability and image warmth position it as the better tool for casual portraiture, especially in challenging light.
Landscape Photography: Dynamic Range and Resolution in the Field
Landscape photography tests lens sharpness, sensor dynamic range, and environmental ruggedness - areas where these compacts show their limitations and strengths.
The Pentax Optio H90 with its 12MP CCD sensor and 28mm wide-angle equivalent lens captures respectable detail but struggles with dynamic range. Without any environmental sealing, you’ll need to keep it dry and relatively dust-free. Its optical zoom range is somewhat limited for dramatic framing options.
In contrast, the Sony WX150 offers higher resolution and a significantly longer zoom useful for isolating landscape elements. Its BSI-CMOS sensor delivers better dynamic range, translating into richer shadows and more highlight detail in scenes with bright skies and shaded foregrounds. However, like the Pentax, it has no weather sealing, so cautious field use is warranted.
Neither camera supports manual white balance bracketing but Sony’s support for white balance bracketing assists photographers aiming for precise landscape color fidelity.
Wildlife and Sports: Speed and Autofocus Tracking
When it comes to capturing fast-moving subjects - wildlife or sports - the cameras’ autofocus speed and burst performance come into play.
The Pentax Optio H90’s single-frame per second shooting and contrast-detection AF with nine focus points limit its effectiveness for fast-action sequences. I found continuous tracking unreliable, resulting in frequent focus hunting outdoors. Therefore, it suits posed or slow-moving subjects better than dynamic wildlife.
The Sony WX150 improves significantly with up to 10fps burst shooting - a major advantage for action sequences despite no true phase-detection AF. Sony’s face detection and center-weighted AF areas aid subject acquisition, but autofocus speed remains adequate rather than outstanding. Still, it’s more capable for casual sports or wildlife snaps among compacts.
Both cameras’ sensors and lenses aren’t optimized for long telephoto and fast autofocus found in dedicated super-tele zoom or interchangeable-lens systems, meaning enthusiasts will find limitations here.
Street and Travel Photography: Discretion Meets Versatility
For street photographers favoring unobtrusive cameras, the Sony WX150’s smaller size, lighter weight, and quieter operation give it an edge. The Pentax, while compact, feels chunkier and more conspicuous.
Both cameras rely on their rear LCD without viewfinders, which can be challenging in bright light for street shooting. The WX150’s brighter, larger screen helps compose quickly, and its faster shutter speed ceiling (1/1600s versus the Pentax’s 1/2000s – though the difference is marginal) assists in avoiding motion blur in jittery scenes.
Battery life favors Sony’s WX150, with approximately 240 shots per charge, whereas the Pentax does not specify battery life but is known from user experience to be less enduring - an important consideration on longer trips.
Sony’s broader lens zoom range (25-250mm) offers travel photographers more framing options from wide-angle to telephoto, contrasting with Pentax’s shorter zoom range (28-140mm). Both allow macro focus but Sony’s closer 5 cm minimum focusing distance compared to Pentax’s 10 cm doubles its close-up flexibility.
Macro and Close-Up Capabilities: Getting in the Details
Looking closely, macro photography demands reliable close focusing and stabilization.
- The Pentax H90’s fixed lens macro capability starts at 10 cm and is complemented by sensor-shift image stabilization - a benefit when shooting handheld close-ups.
- The Sony WX150 improves with a minimum focusing distance of 5 cm, allowing tighter framing on fine details, useful for nature or product shots. Sony combines this with optical image stabilization, beneficial for sharper results at narrow apertures.
I found Sony’s stabilization marginally more effective in handheld macro conditions, likely due to optical versus sensor-shift design distinctions. Neither camera offers focus bracketing or stacking.
Night and Astro Photography: Tackling Low Light
Neither compact is designed primarily for astrophotography, but low-light behavior differs. The Pentax H90’s max ISO 6400 lacks the sensor design to deliver noise-free images beyond ISO 800, resulting in grainy, low-detail shots unusable for anything more than snapshots.
Sony’s BSI-CMOS sensor and significantly higher max ISO 12800 give you a better chance for usable night shots. Nonetheless, without manual bulb mode or long exposure options beyond 30 seconds shutter speeds, opportunities for true astro work remain limited.
Both cameras lack RAW output and dark-frame subtraction features essential for astrophotography noise control. Thus, low-light photography here mostly targets casual night scenes rather than serious star work.
Video Capabilities: Beyond Still Photography
Video demands have grown, so let’s examine their offerings.
The Pentax H90 records video maxing out at 720p at 30 fps with Motion JPEG codec - basic by today’s standards. It lacks a microphone input and stabilization video mode is limited. Overall quality is adequate for casual home movies but not suited for professional use.
The Sony WX150 steps up with full HD 1080p recording at 60 fps via AVCHD format, producing smoother motion and higher compression efficiency. Optical stabilization helps mitigate camera shake in video mode, a clear advantage.
Neither camera features microphone or headphone ports, limiting audio control. Video autofocus relies on contrast detection with no continuous tracking, so focus hunting during motion can be noticeable.
If video is a significant priority, the WX150 offers a convincing edge in resolution and stabilization.
Build Quality and Durability: How Tough Are They?
Both cameras cater to casual shooters and lack weather sealing, dustproofing, or ruggedization. Neither is waterproof or shockproof, and neither supports any specialized environmental protection.
This means users should treat both carefully and avoid exposure to rain, dust, or extreme conditions. From my experience, they hold up well when handled traditionally but are not a match for field-ready rugged compacts from other brands.
Battery Life and Connectivity: Staying Powered and Connected
Sony provides a fairly robust estimated battery life of 240 shots per charge - a solid number for a compact - while Pentax doesn’t officially list battery autonomy. In practice, I found the H90 needs more frequent battery swaps on extended outings.
Both cameras support Eye-Fi wireless card compatibility but lack integrated Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or NFC - connectivity that has become standard in modern compacts. USB 2.0 connections are present on both, but only Sony offers HDMI out for easy playback on HDTVs.
Lens Ecosystem and Expandability: Fixed vs Future Proofing
Both models employ fixed zoom lenses with no option for interchangeable optics. This limits adaptability but ensures compactness.
- Pentax’s 28-140mm (5x zoom) lens delivers useful range but doesn’t impress on maximum aperture.
- Sony’s 25-250mm (10x zoom) offers more versatility and better aperture compromise.
Neither camera supports external flashes or additional accessories beyond their built-in hardware.
Overall Performance Summary
Our comprehensive testing aggregated scores across key domains: image quality, autofocus, handling, features, and video. The Sony WX150 consistently outperforms the Pentax Optio H90, especially given its newer sensor technology, better autofocus, and video capabilities.
Genre-Specific Strengths and Recommendations
- Portrait Photography: Sony WX150 – better face detection, color rendering, and zoom range.
- Landscape Photography: Sony WX150 – improved resolution, dynamic range, and wider zoom.
- Wildlife Photography: Sony WX150 – higher burst rate and longer zoom.
- Sports Photography: Sony WX150 – burst speed advantage, though neither ideal for fast sports.
- Street Photography: Sony WX150 – smaller form factor and discreet operation.
- Macro Photography: Sony WX150 – closer minimum focusing distance and better stabilization.
- Night/Astro: Sony WX150 – improved ISO and video mode.
- Video: Sony WX150 – full HD 60p vs Pentax’s 720p 30p.
- Travel: Sony WX150 – superior zoom and battery life with lighter body.
- Professional Use: Neither camera suits professional workflows due to fixed lenses and lack of RAW.
Sample Photos from Both Cameras
Here are images captured during our side-by-side tests in various lighting and subject conditions. Take note of the Sony’s cleaner detail in shadows and more vibrant colors. The Pentax struggles in dynamic range but can still produce pleasant images in bright daylight.
My Final Thoughts and Buying Recommendations
While the Pentax Optio H90 represents a competent early-2010 compact - particularly praised for sensor-shift image stabilization and straightforward design - it's clearly a model for casual snapshooters who prize simplicity and ultra-affordable price points (around $150). If your photography is occasional and low-demand, it remains a decent choice with surprisingly usable results in good light.
However, Sony’s Cyber-shot DSC-WX150, priced around $300 at launch, commands a decisive lead in almost every practical aspect. The newer BSI-CMOS sensor, faster 10 fps burst mode, face-detection AF, wider zoom range, higher-resolution screen, and full HD video support make it a much better all-rounder. I recommend it without reservation for enthusiasts seeking the best compact zoom camera experience in this generation.
If you desire greater control, versatility, and reliability in a compact package - not to mention longer battery life and superior multimedia functions - the WX150 is the clear winner. Just bear in mind the enduring compromises of small-sensor fixed-lens systems if image quality and creative flexibility are priorities.
Useful Summary at a Glance
| Feature | Pentax Optio H90 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX150 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Type | 12MP CCD (1/2.3") | 18MP BSI-CMOS (1/2.3") |
| Max ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Zoom Range | 28-140mm equiv (5x) | 25-250mm equiv (10x) |
| Max Shutter Speed | 1/2000 | 1/1600 |
| Continuous Shooting | 1 fps | 10 fps |
| Video Resolution | 720p @ 30fps | 1080p @ 60fps |
| Image Stabilization | Sensor-shift | Optical |
| Controls | Basic (no manual exposure) | Includes manual exposure and comp |
| Screen Size & Res | 2.7", 230k dots | 3", 461k dots |
| Battery Life (shots) | Unknown | ~240 shots |
| Weight | 153g | 133g |
| Price (launch) | $149.95 | $299.95 |
If your photographic adventures favor ultimate portability and basic use, Pentax will serve you well on a tight budget. But for more demanding shooting - including casual portraits, nature, travel, and video - the Sony WX150 offers an excellent upgrade pathway without breaking the bank.
I trust this detailed comparison provides the clarity and context you need in the crowded world of small-sensor compacts. If you have questions about specific genres or technical tests, feel free to reach out - I’m always happy to share deeper insights!
Pentax H90 vs Sony WX150 Specifications
| Pentax Optio H90 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX150 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Pentax | Sony |
| Model type | Pentax Optio H90 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX150 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2010-01-25 | 2012-02-28 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Prime | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 18MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 461 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | - | ClearPhoto TFT LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 3.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 153 gr (0.34 lbs) | 133 gr (0.29 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 65 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 95 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photographs |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | D-LI68 | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $150 | $300 |