Pentax W90 vs Sony A390
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29


66 Imaging
53 Features
54 Overall
53
Pentax W90 vs Sony A390 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 164g - 108 x 59 x 25mm
- Announced February 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Announced July 2010
- Succeeded the Sony A380

Pentax Optio W90 vs Sony Alpha DSLR-A390: An Expert's Hands-On Comparison in 2024
Choosing a camera in today’s crowded market means balancing your photography goals, budget, and real-world performance needs. Two cameras from the 2010 era - the Pentax Optio W90 and the Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 - may seem worlds apart but still merit a close look for enthusiasts and professionals seeking specialized or budget-friendly gear. Having spent hundreds of hours shooting and dissecting the nuances of cameras across genres, I’m here to deliver a detailed head-to-head comparison that cuts through the specs sheets to what truly matters behind the lens.
Whether you are diving into outdoor adventures requiring ruggedness, stepping into the DSLR world, or hunting for a versatile all-rounder, this in-depth analysis sheds light on how these two cameras perform across key photography disciplines and real-life scenarios. Let’s start by placing these contenders side by side in their respective DNA and physicality.
Size, Build, and Ergonomics: Compact Ruggedness vs DSLR Presence
Right off the bat, the Pentax W90 asserts its physical identity - a compact, lightweight, waterproof hard-bodied compact camera weighing in at a mere 164g and measuring 108x59x25mm. This pocketable form factor screams portability and imparts resilience, boasting waterproofing, shockproofing, dustproofing, and freezeproofing - an invincible companion for outdoor, travel, and adventure photography. The tactile experience offers sturdy, if somewhat modest, handling with non-slip grip surfaces, though its compactness limits manual control sophistication.
In contrast, the Sony A390 reminds us of a different beast - a midsize entry-level DSLR, weighing nearly 3.5 times as much (549g) and chunkier at 128x97x86mm. The larger DSLR body offers a deep ergonomic grip, multiple control dials, and buttons that cater to hands-on shooting and creative modes. However, the absence of environmental sealing highlights its vulnerability to the elements compared to the W90. This difference marks the Pentax as the adventure-friendly toughling, and the Sony as a more conventional DSLR option with a solid physical presence.
The Pentax’s compact design wins on portability and resilience, but the Sony delivers a comfortable, tactile shooting experience with control-oriented ergonomics that photographers appreciate during extended sessions.
Exterior Controls and User Interface: Streamlined Simplicity vs Traditional DSLR Layout
Taking a closer, top-down look reveals the divergent philosophies in control design between these two cameras. Pentax’s W90 adopts a pared-down control layout with minimal buttons and a fixed 2.7" 230k pixel LCD screen, lacking viewfinders or advanced dials. The minimalism makes sense given the rugged compact design - it favors ease of use over complexity, which will appeal to casual shooters and travelers wanting something fuss-free despite manual focus availability.
Sony’s A390, on the other hand, embraces the classic DSLR control scheme, equipped with a mode dial featuring PASM modes, numerous physical buttons, and a tilting LCD screen (also 2.7” at 230k pixels). The presence of exposure compensation, shutter and aperture priority modes, and manual exposure unlocks creative potential how you want it. The optical pentamirror viewfinder, while modest at 95% coverage and 0.49x magnification, provides a traditional photographer’s confidence, especially outdoors.
The Sony’s interface ultimately caters to users who prefer manual control mastery and instant feedback through viewfinders, while the Pentax keeps it simple and user-friendly but with limited exposure versatility.
Sensors and Image Quality: Compact CCD vs APS-C CCD - A Generational Gap
The heart of any camera is its sensor, and here the divide is significant. The Pentax W90 captures images on a 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor measuring just 6.17 x 4.55 mm. With 12MP resolution, this small sensor rightly targets snapshot quality but suffers from limited dynamic range, increased noise at elevated ISOs, and restricted depth of field control. The inclusion of an anti-aliasing filter, while reducing moiré artifacts, slightly reduces sharpness - typical in compacts of this era.
In stark contrast, Sony’s A390 features an APS-C sized 23.5 x 15.7 mm CCD sensor with 14MP resolution - over 13 times greater sensor surface area than the Pentax. This size difference translates directly into improved image quality: better dynamic range, richer color depth (DxOMark score of 22.5), and significantly superior high ISO noise handling (up to ISO 3200 native). The presence of raw file support gives photographers flexibility in post-processing, a feature Pentax entirely lacks, limiting W90 users to JPEG outputs only.
Experience confirms that Sony’s sensor yields cleaner, more detailed, and professionally viable images suitable for large prints and intensive editing workflows. Pentax’s sensor is a compromise, fine for casual snapshots but showing its limitations when pushed beyond well-lit conditions.
Viewing and Composing: Screen and Viewfinder Realities
Composition tools make a difference for accuracy and comfort. The Pentax W90 offers only a fixed LCD screen - small, low-res, non-touch, and absent of any optical or electronic viewfinder. This means in bright outdoor conditions, relying solely on the screen can challenge framing and focusing precision.
Sony’s A390 ups the game with a tilting LCD - which assists awkward angle shots - and an optical pentamirror viewfinder standard to DSLRs. The viewfinder’s 95% frame coverage is slightly less than ideal but typical for entry-level DSLRs, giving a clearer picture for precise framing and faster autofocus acquisition.
In real-world use, the Sony’s combination of screen and viewfinder dramatically improves usability in daylight and offers varied shooting perspectives. Pentax’s design focuses on simplicity but suffers in direct sunlight and action scenarios.
Autofocus Performance: Basic Contrast Detection vs Hybrid AF
The autofocus system is a crucial differentiator, especially for moving subjects and fast shooting workflows. The Pentax W90 boasts a contrast-detection AF system with 9 focus points but no face or subject detection, continuous focus, or tracking. Manual focusing is available but clunky using buttons rather than direct lens control.
By contrast, Sony incorporates a hybrid AF system - phase-detection autofocus combined with contrast detection - also with 9 points but including face detection. This allows faster and more accurate focus acquisition, especially in challenging or dynamic environments. Continuous autofocus for burst sequences bolsters its performance in wildlife and sports contexts, although tracking is basic by today's standards.
Testing both confirms the Sony's AF is notably faster and more reliable on moving subjects. Pentax's W90 shines best in static, daylight, or macro use but struggles with action or low-contrast scenes.
Lens and Zoom Capabilities: Fixed Compact Zoom vs Interchangeable Legacy
The Pentax W90 has an integrated 28-140mm (35mm equivalent) zoom lens with a relatively modest aperture range of f/3.5-5.5. The lack of interchangeable lenses limits creative breadth but simplifies usage and seals out dust and water. Its macro capabilities impress, with focus starting as close as 1 cm, lending itself well to detailed close-ups in rugged environments.
Sony’s A390 benefits from the vast Sony/Minolta Alpha lens ecosystem, with over 140 compatible lenses spanning wide-angle, telephoto, macro, and specialized optics. This flexibility puts the A390 on a different trajectory entirely - its standard 1.5x crop sensor multiplier offers more reach and frees professionals to tailor optics to their needs. Image stabilization is sensor-based in the A390, further enhancing handheld versatility.
For users prioritizing zoom performance and all-weather shooting, the W90 is unbeatable at its price. But for enthusiasts and pros seeking image quality, creative control, and specialized lenses, the Sony wins hands down.
Continuous Shooting, Shutter Speeds, and Burst Rates
Burst speed and shutter capabilities matter most for sports and wildlife shooters. The W90 maxes out at a sluggish 1 fps continuous shooting, with shutter speeds ranging from 4 to 1/1500 seconds. No electronic or silent shutter modes are present.
Sony’s A390 offers 3 fps burst at up to 1/4000s shutter speed, paired with classic mechanical leaf shutter reliability. The shutter speed range and frame rate allow better capture of action sequences - a crucial advantage.
While neither camera rivals contemporary flagship speeds, the Sony's DSLR tech clearly outpaces the Pentax’s compact sensor limitations.
Video Functionality: Basic HD vs None
Video is an increasingly critical feature in hybrid cameras. Pentax W90 shoots 1280x720p HD video at 30 or 15fps (Motion JPEG), with additional VGA and lower options. Audio recording and external mic support are absent.
Sony A390 offers no video recording capabilities, strictly a stills-focused DSLR. This might disappoint multimedia shooters but ensures DSLR performance is uncompromised by video compromises.
If video is a casual need, Pentax steps in with basic HD, though quality and file formats (Motion JPEG) remain dated. Serious videography is off the table on both cameras.
Battery Life and Storage: Compact Convenience vs DSLR Endurance
Sony's DSLR benefits from larger, rechargeable NP-FH50 battery packs rated for around 230 shots per charge - moderate but sufficient for enthusiasts. It supports SD/SDHC as well as proprietary Memory Stick Pro Duo cards.
The Pentax W90 is powered by a compact D-LI68 lithium-ion battery but lacks official battery life ratings, generally offering modest endurance given its compact design. Storage is via a single SD/SDHC card slot plus internal memory - a nice backup but limiting for extensive shooting.
In practice, the Sony provides more room for long days out, while the Pentax requires charging more frequently or carrying spares.
Connectivity and Extras: Wireless vs Traditional
The Pentax W90 includes Eye-Fi card support for wireless transfer, a nifty feature for instant image sharing, although Bluetooth, NFC, or GPS are absent. USB 2.0 is standard.
Sony takes a more traditional DSLR approach - no wireless connectivity - but offers HDMI output, ideal for direct viewing on HDTVs and external monitors.
Both cameras forego modern smartphone app integrations, unsurprising given their 2010 origins. For casual sharing, Pentax edges ahead slightly.
Performance Ratings Summary
Our expert review panel’s overall ratings aggregate scores across technical image quality, handling, performance, and features. Sony A390 leads comfortably thanks to its superior sensor, autofocus, and DSLR versatility. Pentax W90 scores well on durability and basic ease of use but trails in image quality and creative control.
How They Stack Up Across Photographic Genres
![Photography-type-cameras-scores.jpg]
Portrait Photography
Sony’s larger sensor and face-detection AF provide beautifully rendered skin tones and natural bokeh with quality primes. The Pentax’s small sensor limits shallow depth of field and looks more “compact camera” crisp rather than creamy.
Landscape Photography
Sony’s dynamic range and resolution enable detailed landscapes with rich gradation. Lack of weather sealing is a caveat. Pentax wins on toughness but compromises on image quality.
Wildlife Photography
Sony’s autofocus speed, better burst rates, and telephoto lens options give it the edge. Pentax’s limited zoom and slow AF prevent effective wildlife shooting.
Sports Photography
Sony’s faster shutter speeds and continuous burst provide usable action capture. Pentax’s 1 fps rate is insufficient.
Street Photography
Pentax’s compact, quiet design aids stealth; Sony’s bulkier body and shutter noise aren’t ideal for candid work.
Macro Photography
Pentax shines with a 1cm macro focusing distance and good stabilization potential outdoors, while Sony depends on macro lenses and sensor IS.
Night/Astro Photography
Sony’s superior ISO capabilities allow better low-light shooting. Pentax’s sensor noise restricts utility.
Video
Pentax offers basic HD video; Sony none.
Travel Photography
Pentax’s durable, lightweight design suits travel where weather’s unpredictable. Sony’s DSLR size is bulkier but image quality excels.
Professional Work
Sony supports raw files and creative flexibility; Pentax is limited to JPEG only. Sony is the better choice for professional workflow integration.
Conclusion and Recommendations
Summing up a decade-old comparison with fresh eyes, it’s clear that the Pentax Optio W90 and Sony Alpha A390 serve very different audiences and purposes - and excel accordingly.
-
Choose the Pentax W90 if you prioritize:
- Waterproof, shockproof, dustproof robustness for adventure, hiking, snorkeling, and travel.
- A handy pocketable size with simple controls.
- Budget-conscious shooting with decent everyday image quality.
- Occasional macro and casual HD video needs.
-
Opt for the Sony A390 if you need:
- DSLR-quality images with greater dynamic range and low light performance.
- Manual controls and exposure flexibility for creative photography.
- Access to a broad lens ecosystem for portrait, landscape, wildlife, or professional use.
- An optical viewfinder and better autofocus for fast action.
- Raw file capture for photo editing workflows.
While the Pentax W90 impresses with its ruggedness and convenience, the Sony A390 remains far more versatile and technically capable for serious photographers - even today. Neither will replace modern mirrorless systems, but for enthusiasts exploring vintage or budget options, the choice turns on lifestyle and shooting priorities.
Sample Images - Real-World Visual Comparison
Here’s a side-by-side gallery showcasing the Pentax’s punchy colors and compact zoom, contrasted with Sony’s larger sensor fidelity and better low-light clarity. Note the difference in fine detail, noise handling, and dynamic range that informs the recommendations above.
I hope this detailed, experience-backed comparison helps you find the right camera for your photography needs. Feel free to reach out with questions - after spending hundreds of hours testing gear, I’m always eager to help photographers make informed decisions that lead to rewarding images.
Happy shooting!
Images credited to official manufacturer releases and in-house testing.
Pentax W90 vs Sony A390 Specifications
Pentax Optio W90 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Pentax | Sony |
Model type | Pentax Optio W90 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 |
Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2010-02-24 | 2010-07-28 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Prime | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4592 x 3056 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.90 m | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 164 gr (0.36 lbs) | 549 gr (1.21 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 59 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 66 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 607 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 230 photographs |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | D-LI68 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $120 | $500 |