Pentax W90 vs Sony QX10
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
96 Imaging
42 Features
34 Overall
38
Pentax W90 vs Sony QX10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 164g - 108 x 59 x 25mm
- Launched February 2010
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1440 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 105g - 62 x 62 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2013
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Pentax W90 vs Sony QX10: A Practical Dive into Compact Innovation
When comparing cameras separated by just a few years but targeting very different niches, it’s essential to ground ourselves in the real-world contexts these devices inhabit. The Pentax Optio W90 and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10 both cater to users craving versatility in compact bodies, yet they deliver that versatility on very distinct terms.
Having extensively tested thousands of digital cameras through varied genres - from wildlife outings to urban daytrips - I’ve found that understanding the core design philosophies is key to matching the right tool to your needs. Let’s embark on a detailed comparison that pits the rugged waterproof convenience of the Pentax W90 against the unique smartphone-centric lens-style design of the Sony QX10, exploring their strengths, compromises, and where they best fit in your shooting routine.
First Impressions: Handling and Ergonomics in the Field
Right out of the gate, these cameras feel very different in the hand. The Pentax W90 is a compact but robust waterproof camera designed to take a beating outdoors. Its rectangular shape and firm grip exude durability, while the button layout emphasizes tactile feedback - crucial when you’re chasing waves or hiking in inclement weather.
In contrast, the Sony QX10 drastically reimagines the camera concept. It’s essentially a lens-style device without a built-in screen or traditional controls, relying instead on a connected smartphone for composition and settings. The QX10’s small, cylindrical body feels light and minimalistic but demands a smartphone interface to bring it to life.

The Pentax’s 108x59x25 mm footprint is larger but still pocketable and gives the sensation of a ready-to-shoot rugged companion, wielded confidently in various environments. The Sony’s 62x62x33 mm compact form factor slips discreetly into a pocket or bag without much weight at 105 grams, but handling depends heavily on how you pair it with your phone - ergonomics vary widely with the smartphone model and any additional accessories you may use.
The practical takeaway: If you prioritize physical camera independence with standalone controls and ruggedness, the Pentax W90 leads. If streamlined travel and smartphone integration are paramount, the Sony QX10’s design aligns well.
Controls and User Interface: Traditional Meets Modern Modularity
The physical controls of the two cameras reveal stark design philosophies.

The Pentax W90 deploys a modest array of buttons and a directional pad that let you navigate settings and modes without fuss, even with wet or gloved hands. Its screen is fixed at 2.7 inches, modest in size and resolution by modern standards, but functional. It lacks touchscreen functionality, so reliance on buttons is total, which, for an outdoor waterproof device, is a sensible approach - touchscreens often falter in wet conditions.
The Sony QX10, devoid of any display and with minimal physical buttons (power and shutter), offloads all interaction to the smartphone touchscreen. This means you gain the sophistication of a modern UI, including touch focus and menu navigation, but with a tradeoff: the camera cannot function independently - no on-camera screen, no tactile settings control.

This tethering speeds up image review and parameter adjustment for tech-savvy users comfortable with app ecosystems but hampers traditionalists or those venturing into areas with poor smartphone signal or battery limitations.
Thus, we see the Pentax aiming for straightforward, weatherproof operational reliability while the Sony opts for modular connectivity, banking on the phone as the central interface hub.
Sensor and Image Quality: Diving Beneath the Surface
At the heart of every camera comparison lies sensor tech: size, resolution, and performance significantly shape photographic outcomes. Both models feature the same nominal sensor size - 1/2.3 inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm) - a common format for compact cameras, but their sensor types and resolutions differ sharply.

Pentax W90: The W90’s 12 MP CCD sensor is a solid performer for its era, optimized for basic point-and-shoot tasks. However, CCD tech, while delivering pleasing color fidelity, tends to struggle with noise at elevated ISO levels. Its maximum ISO 6400 rating is nominal; practically usable up to ISO 400 in low light.
Sony QX10: Sporting an 18 MP back-illuminated CMOS sensor, the QX10 bumps resolution significantly while improving light sensitivity and high ISO capacity. BSI technology enhances readout efficiency, producing cleaner files at ISO 800 and beyond. The QX10’s max ISO 3200 is more usable in varied lighting, though the lens aperture ceiling pulls in some limitations.
In side-by-side shooting tests, the Sony delivers sharper, more detailed images with better noise control and more dynamic range latitude, especially noticeable in shadow retention and highlight preservation. The Pentax, while competent outdoors in good lighting, reveals grain and detail loss earlier.
The CCD sensor’s slightly warmer color rendition on the W90 can be a plus for portraiture under natural light, contributing to flattering skin tone portrayal, but the overall image quality advantage rests with the Sony.
Optics, Zoom, and Stabilization: Getting Close with Confidence
Both cameras feature fixed zoom lenses with sizeable focal length ranges, enabling versatile framing options.
- Pentax W90: 28-140 mm (5x) zoom at F3.5-5.5
- Sony QX10: 25-250 mm (10x) zoom at F3.3-5.9
The QX10’s 10x zoom extends your reach more significantly than the Pentax’s 5x, translating to more telephoto flexibility for subjects like distant wildlife or candid street shots.
However, the Pentax’s close macro focus down to 1 cm is insanely sharp - perfect for detailed nature close-ups or product photography. The Sony’s 5 cm macro minimum focus is reasonable but less extreme.
Critically, the Sony includes optical image stabilization (OIS), mitigating blur from hand shake especially at telephoto or low shutter speeds. The Pentax lacks any stabilization, which means indoor or tele shots without a tripod risk softness.
This makes the Sony QX10 a safer bet for handheld telephoto and low-light scenarios, whereas the Pentax’s zoom specs are more limited but balanced by macro prowess.
Autofocus Performance: Speed and Accuracy in the Moment
Autofocus systems are a cornerstone of responsive photography. The Pentax W90 employs contrast-detection AF with 9 focus points but lacks face detection or continuous AF modes. Its AF is adequate for composed stills but tends to hunt in low contrast, dim conditions.
The Sony QX10 ups the game with face detection and contrast-detection AF suited for smartphone-based control, though it doesn’t provide continuous AF tracking during video or burst shooting modes.
Neither offers phase-detection AF or eye/animal detection features found in modern mirrorless systems. But practically, for casual shooting and portraits, the Sony’s face detection helps nab sharper focus on subjects’ eyes - especially useful given the phone interface supports touch AF.
For action, both cameras are limited: the Pentax only manages 1 fps burst, and the Sony does not specify burst speed but lacks continuous AF, meaning neither camera shines for fast wildlife or sports.
Video Capabilities: Beyond Still Photography
Video recording remains modest on both devices but with distinct approaches.
-
Pentax W90 shoots up to 1280x720 at 30 fps in Motion JPEG format. It includes basic time-lapse recording but no external microphone inputs or advanced exposure control during video.
-
Sony QX10 supports 1440x1080-inch (a nonstandard HD sub-format) at 30 fps encoded in MPEG-4. It lacks built-in flash or audio ports, and video control must be managed via smartphone.
Neither camera embraces 4K or advanced codecs, reflecting their vintage and price class.
For casual users, the Pentax’s water/seal features mean easier outdoor video capture without worrying about rain - something the Sony cannot match.
Durability and Environmental Resistance: Ready for the Elements?
Compact cameras targeting the adventurous tend to differentiate themselves by build toughness.
Pentax Optio W90 is shockproof, freezeproof, dustproof, and waterproof down to some extent, making it an excellent companion for snorkeling, hikes in unpredictable weather, or ski trips. Its rugged design lets you shoot without a protective case.
The Sony QX10, being a lens-style camera requiring smartphone tethering, has no environmental sealing, meaning it’s best reserved for controlled conditions or casual urban use.
If outdoors or water sports shooting is your priority, the Pentax W90 is clearly built to last in harsher environments.
Connectivity and Storage: How Do These Cameras Play with Others?
The QX10 leverages integrated Wi-Fi and NFC for smooth smartphone pairing, allowing easy remote control, image transfer, and cloud sharing through companion apps - a major advantage for instant sharing and on-the-go social media habitués.
The Pentax W90 supports Eye-Fi cards for wireless image transfer, an older standard requiring special SD cards, and lacks Bluetooth or NFC. USB 2.0 connectivity is present on both cameras.
In terms of storage, the Pentax takes standard SD/SDHC cards, while the Sony uses microSD and Memory Stick Micro formats, the latter being more niche and potentially inconvenient.
Battery life favors the Sony QX10, with a rated 220 shots per charge using its proprietary NP-BN battery, whereas the Pentax’s D-LI68 battery stats are unclear but likely similar or slightly shorter.
Real-World Shooting Scenarios: Applying the Cameras Across Genres
Let’s break down how each camera performs when we apply them to popular photography types. In my hands, the experience confirms their niches.
Portraiture
-
Pentax W90 captures pleasant, natural skin tones with its CCD sensor; its 9-point AF is sufficient but lacks face detection. The fixed aperture zoom lens produces modest bokeh at longer focal lengths but no dramatic subject isolation.
-
Sony QX10 benefits from face detection focusing and higher resolution sensor, producing sharper portraits. The deeper zoom range lets you isolate subjects better from a distance, but f/5.9 at telephoto limits sharp background blur creativity.
Landscape
-
The Pentax’s ruggedness allows for shooting comfortably in damp or dusty environments - valuable on mountain trails or coastal areas.
-
The Sony’s higher resolution and BSI CMOS sensor capture finer detail and better dynamic range, making it advantageous on wide vistas when paired with a high-quality smartphone screen for framing.
Wildlife & Sports Photography
- Neither camera excels here. The Pentax’s 1 fps burst is underwhelming; no continuous AF tracking limits capturing action. The Sony’s lack of continuous AF and mid-level max ISO restricts fast shooting in varied environments.
Street Photography
-
The Pentax’s waterproof body and physical controls can aid candid shooting in all weather. However, its bulk is a slight hindrance.
-
The Sony QX10’s discreet lens design and smartphone tethering yield a flexible street photography rig for users comfortable with their phone UI but at a slower response time.
Macro Photography
-
Pentax W90 shines with its 1 cm minimum focusing distance, capturing amazing detail close-ups.
-
Sony QX10’s 5 cm minimum focus is less impressive but still serviceable for casual macro shots.
Night and Astro Photography
-
Both sensors are challenged by the small sensor size - not ideal for low-light or astro work.
-
The Sony’s BSI sensor fares slightly better at elevated ISO, but neither supports long bulb exposures or raw formats, limiting astrophotography potential.
Video
-
Pentax’s waterproof construction wins outdoors.
-
Sony’s smartphone integration enhances control but offers lower max video resolution and less convenient shooting.
Travel Photography
-
Pentax W90 offers durability, weather sealing, and simple operation, perfect for diverse travel.
-
Sony QX10 is compact and light, great for pairing with a phone as a supplementary zoom lens.
Professional Work
- Neither camera is professional-grade; raw capture absence and limited manual controls restrict their utility.
Summing Up the Numbers: Objective Performance Ratings
Based on comprehensive testing metrics factoring image quality, speed, ergonomics, and versatility:
-
Pentax W90 scores high for durability and ease of use outdoors but trails on image quality and zoom reach.
-
Sony QX10 rates well in zoom versatility, sensor resolution, and connectivity but suffers from dependency on a smartphone interface and lack of environmental sealing.
Specialty Scorecards: Photography Genre Breakdown
- Portrait: Sony edging out Pentax thanks to AF tech and sensor resolution
- Landscape: Slight Sony advantage in resolution; Pentax favored for rugged conditions
- Wildlife: Neither ideal
- Sports: Neither ideal
- Street: Sony favored for stealth; Pentax for robustness
- Macro: Pentax clearly better at close focusing
- Night/Astro: Both weak, Sony slightly better ISO noise control
- Video: Pentax preferred due to environmental sealing
- Travel: Tie; depends if user values ruggedness or smartphone integration
Sample Images: Putting Pixels to the Test
Comparing JPEGs shot side-by-side reveals the Sony delivering crisper details and better low-light noise performance. The Pentax images have a warmer tone but show early diffusion in shadows and highlights.
Who Should Buy Which Camera?
If adventure travel or outdoor photography in severe conditions is your priority and you seek a solid, no-nonsense point-and-shoot, the Pentax W90 remains an appealing choice, especially given its budget price (~$120). Its waterproof capabilities trump the Sony, while its image quality is decent given concessions.
The Sony QX10’s strength lies in its modular synergy with a smartphone. If you want a pocketable, high-zoom lens camera supplementing your phone that can shoot high-resolution images with face detection autofocus, it’s worth considering despite lacking weather resistance and traditional controls. It fits casual shooters eager to integrate their camera and phone ecosystems seamlessly, at roughly double the Pentax’s cost.
Final Considerations: Reflections from Years of Testing
Having tested both cameras extensively in controlled and real-world environments - from rain-soaked hikes to concert halls lit dimly - I appreciate their unique value propositions. The Pentax W90 impresses through durability and straightforward operation, delivering reliable imagery under challenging light and weather. Its macro capabilities are a standout in its price bracket.
Conversely, the Sony QX10 showcases an innovative camera concept foreshadowing the smartphone lens accessories we see today. Its reliance on smartphone control limits standing alone but offers performance and connectivity beyond typical compacts of its generation, particularly with its zoom reach and image quality.
Neither camera suits professional needs - both are niche tools best appreciated with clear expectations of their purpose.
In conclusion: Choose the Pentax W90 if you want rugged versatility and waterproof confidence in a self-contained package for active outdoor use. Opt for the Sony QX10 if you prize zoom range and seamless smartphone integration for casual, connected shooting in controlled environments.
Both cameras tell an intriguing story of compact camera evolution: one rooted in traditional rugged design, the other in modular connectivity paving the way for future hybrid imaging solutions.
I hope this detailed comparison helps you find the compact camera that will best fit your photography lifestyle and creative goals. Feel free to share your experiences with either of these models in the comments below - I’m always eager to learn how gear performs in your hands!
Pentax W90 vs Sony QX10 Specifications
| Pentax Optio W90 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Pentax | Sony |
| Model type | Pentax Optio W90 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10 |
| Category | Waterproof | Lens-style |
| Launched | 2010-02-24 | 2013-09-04 |
| Body design | Compact | Lens-style |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Prime | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 18MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | - |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 0k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | - | Depends on connected smartphone |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.90 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | None |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1440 x 1080 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1440x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 164g (0.36 lb) | 105g (0.23 lb) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 59 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 62 x 62 x 33mm (2.4" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 images |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | D-LI68 | NP-BN, |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $120 | $250 |