Pentax WG-1 GPS vs Sony W560: A Hands-On Comparison for Enthusiasts and Professionals

Choosing the right camera can feel overwhelming, especially when options span diverse categories like rugged waterproof compacts and lightweight ultracompacts. Today, I’m diving into a thorough comparison between two 2011-era compact cameras - the Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W560. Both offer 14-megapixel CCD sensors but come from quite different design philosophies and use case scenarios. I’ve tested these models extensively, from outdoor adventure shoots to casual travel photography, and I’m eager to share what I’ve discovered in terms of real-world performance, technical architecture, and value.

Whether you are a budding nature photographer, a weekend traveler, or a professional seeking a dependable secondary camera, this comparison will walk you through nuanced trade-offs between these two distinct cameras to help you make an informed purchase.

Getting Acquainted: What Are These Cameras Built For?

Before digging into specs and image quality, it’s essential to understand the fundamental intent behind each model.

The Pentax WG-1 GPS is rugged to the core - waterproof, shockproof, freezeproof, dustproof, and crushproof. It’s designed as a tough companion for outdoor adventures, extreme weather, and rough handling. Besides durability, it also integrates built-in GPS for geotagging, a feature rarely found in compact cameras of this class and vintage.

In contrast, the Sony W560 prioritizes ultracompact portability and ease of use. It lacks environmental sealing but offers a slightly faster lens and optical image stabilization to assist handheld shooting. The W560 also supports additional memory formats like Sony’s Memory Stick Duo, which broadens storage flexibility.

Here’s a quick side-by-side snapshot to help you visually grasp size differences:

Notice right away that the WG-1 is noticeably bulkier, making sense given its rugged shell. The Sony’s slim profile scores high for pocketability but at a potential cost to durability.

Who’s Winning the Design and Ergonomics Battle?

Looking closer, the Pentax WG-1 GPS reveals a robust, textured grip and well-spaced buttons. It’s weather-sealed, confirming Pentax’s intent on making it an all-terrain camera. It’s heavier (167 grams) and larger (116x59x29mm), which could be less convenient for extended shooting sessions, especially when traveling light.

The Sony W560 trades ruggedness for sleekness - only 110 grams and a slender 94x56x19mm body. Its single-hand operation is generally comfortable, but don’t expect to use it confidently in rain or snow.

Take a look at their top view to compare control layouts:

Both cameras have very straightforward controls - this isn’t a place for complex dials or advanced manual controls. The WG-1’s controls feel slightly more tactile, aiding use with gloves or wet hands, whereas the W560’s buttons are a bit smaller and might be fiddly during active shooting.

In terms of interfaces:

• Both have fixed-type LCD screens (no articulation).
• WG-1’s 2.7-inch screen with anti-reflective coating is smaller but adequate.
• W560 offers a larger 3-inch “Clear Photo” LCD that's easier on the eyes, though not ideal for bright sunlight.

Here is a side-by-side look at their LCDs:

Verdict: If your adventures demand solid ergonomics and a durable build, the WG-1 GPS fits the bill. For casual street photography or travel where compactness and screen size matter more, the Sony W560 wins.

Peering Beneath the Hood: Sensor Technology and Image Quality Insight

Both cameras sport 1/2.3-inch CCD sensors of nearly identical size - 6.17 x 4.55 mm resulting in an identical sensor area of 28.07 mm², and both pack in 14 megapixels. Yet, sensor technology nuances and post-processing algorithms make a significant difference going beyond raw specs.

• Pentax WG-1 GPS: Max ISO 6400, fixed anti-aliasing filter, no RAW support.
• Sony W560: Max ISO 3200, same sensor size, no RAW support.

CCD sensors from this generation tend to excel at producing pleasing color tones and decent dynamic range but fall behind CMOS sensors for high ISO performance and noise control. In this light, the Pentax’s higher ISO ceiling sounds promising, but in practice, image noise at ISO 3200+ gets quite pronounced on both cameras.

For everyday shooting (ISO 80-400), you can expect crisp 14MP files with pleasing color reproduction from either camera, though Pentax's anti-reflective coating on the screen and optimized firmware lend slightly better contrast and color fidelity - especially when shooting outdoors.

You’ll see more subtle differences in real-world scenarios:

Pentax WG 1 GPS front Pentax WG 1 GPS screen back Sony W560 front Sony W560 screen back

Notice the WG-1 image retains details in shadow areas and renders skin tones warmer, while the Sony shows a slightly cooler tone and a bit more noise creeping in at higher ISO settings.

Autofocus and Shooting Performance: Speed vs Precision

Both cameras employ contrast-detection autofocus with nine AF points, but their tracking approaches vary.

• Pentax WG-1 GPS supports AF tracking, helping maintain focus on moving subjects - handy for wildlife snapshots.
• Sony W560 offers standard single AF - best for static scenes.

Neither camera has face or eye-detection AF, so expect some manual AF point selection when framing close portraits.

Continuous shooting is limited to 1 frame per second on both - fine for casual bursts but not adequate for fast action or sports photography.

Here’s the autofocus performance summary I recorded for varied scenarios:

For wildlife and sports, the WG-1’s enhanced AF tracking provides a moderate edge, though don’t expect DSLR-level speed or accuracy.

Lens Capabilities: Zoom Range and Aperture Considerations

Let’s compare optics:

• Pentax WG-1 GPS: 28-140mm equivalent, f/3.5-5.5 aperture.
• Sony W560: 26-104mm equivalent, f/2.7-5.7 aperture.

While Pentax boasts a longer zoom range (5x vs 4x Sony), the Sony features a faster wide-angle lens (f/2.7 vs f/3.5) which helps in lower-light conditions and achieving some background separation.

Neither camera offers optical zoom stabilization on paper, but:

• Sony W560 features Optical Image Stabilization (OIS), crucial for handheld shots at slower shutter speeds or longer focal lengths.
• Pentax WG-1 GPS lacks image stabilization entirely, so you will need to rely on faster shutter speeds or tripods for sharp handheld images beyond wide angle.

Here’s a concise lens summary:

The WG-1 is better positioned for capturing distant subjects thanks to the longer zoom and closer macro capabilities (down to 1 cm!). But if you struggle in dim indoor or evening light, Sony’s wider aperture and OIS will make a noticeable difference.

Durability and Environmental Resistance: When the Going Gets Tough

If you’re an outdoors enthusiast, this is a critical section.

The Pentax WG-1 GPS boasts a multi-layered sealed body making it waterproof to 10 meters, shockproof for drops from 1.5 meters, freezeproof to -10°C, dustproof, and even crushproof up to 100 kgf. This is industry-leading for compact cameras even by today’s standards.

By comparison, the Sony W560 offers no weather sealing or ruggedness.

The durability advantage makes the WG-1 a go-to choice for hiking, snorkeling, beach holidays, or any scenario where your camera is exposed to harsh elements.

Battery Life and Storage: Staying Powered and Saving Shots

Battery capacity and storage versatility matter much more than one might think in the field.

• Pentax WG-1 GPS uses D-LI92 rechargeable battery with a rated 260 shots per charge.
• Sony W560 uses NP-BN1 with unspecified battery life but generally around 230-250 shots per CIPA standards.

Both support SD/SDHC/SDXC cards, but Sony additionally takes Memory Stick Duo formats - useful if you already own Sony-specific storage.

For extended trips, neither offer removable battery packs of significant capacity (no external packs), but the WG-1’s efficient power management and rugged body better justify carrying spare batteries.

Video and Connectivity: What Can You Shoot?

Video capabilities are modest on both:

• Pentax WG-1 GPS: 720p HD at 30 fps using Motion JPEG format.
• Sony W560: 720p HD at 30 fps with MPEG-4 compression.

Neither provides microphone or headphone ports, limiting audio capture quality. Sony’s MPEG-4 is generally more storage efficient.

The WG-1 also offers built-in GPS - a feature invaluable if you want location data stamped on your images, ideal for travelogue or outdoor documentation.

Both cameras support Eye-Fi wireless SD card connection, aiding remote image transfer.

Diving Into Specialty Photography Applications

Let me address the nuts and bolts of popular photography genres:

Portrait Photography

• Neither camera sports face or eye-detection autofocus.
• WG-1’s longer zoom helps portraits from a comfortable distance; however, Sony’s faster lens at wide angle offers better background separation for artistic portraits.
• Both produce decent colors, but budget limitations show in inability to shoot RAW, so post-processing latitude is limited.

Landscape Photography

• Both share the same sensor size and resolution.
• WG-1’s ruggedness allows landscape photographers to shoot in the rain or even underwater shooting.
• Dynamic range at these sensor sizes is limited, but WG-1’s GPS tagging gives a travel photographer an organizational edge.

Wildlife Photography

• WG-1’s longer 140mm zoom, AF tracking, and shutter speeds up to 1/1500 sec help capture quick movement to some extent.
• Sony’s shorter zoom and lack of AF tracking make wildlife difficult to nail sharply.

Sports Photography

• Neither camera is well suited for fast sports - just 1 fps continuous shooting and slow AF.
• WG-1’s tracking is a slight advantage outdoors.

Street Photography

• Sony’s compactness and lighter weight are better for handheld, low-profile shooting.
• WG-1 is bulkier and signals presence but provides ruggedness in all conditions.

Macro Photography

• WG-1’s macro focusing down to 1 cm is outstanding and allows highly detailed close-ups.
• Sony’s 5 cm macro minimum is more conventional.

Night and Astro Photography

• Both struggle given sensor tech and shaky long exposure support.
• Neither has bulb mode or manual exposure settings.

Video Capabilities

• For casual HD video, both suffice.
• Sony’s MPEG-4 format gives slightly smaller files.

Travel Photography

• WG-1 is heavier but covers all environments.
• Sony’s ultra-compact design and lighter weight favor urban and low-impact travel.

Professional Work and Workflow

• Lack of RAW and advanced manual controls limit both to enthusiast or casual pro secondary use.
• WG-1’s GPS and rugged design can be indispensable for documentary photographers in rough scenarios.

Wrapping it Up: Who Should Buy What?

Let’s look at the big picture with overall ratings based on extended field testing and performance benchmarks:

Breaking down scores by photography specialty also clarifies best uses:

• Pentax excels for rugged outdoor use, macro work, and rough conditions.
• Sony shines in casual street, travel, and indoor photography where compact size and lens speed matter.

Final Thoughts: Practical Recommendations Based on Your Priorities

If you need a durable, all-weather companion with GPS geotagging, a flexible zoom lens, and macro prowess, the Pentax WG-1 GPS is tough to beat despite lacking modern refinements such as RAW or advanced AF systems.

On the other hand, if you crave lightweight portability, good wide-angle lens speed, image stabilization, and slightly better video format, all at a friendlier price point, the Sony W560 offers compelling value for casual shooters.

They are two cameras optimized for fundamentally different priorities - a rugged outdoor tool vs a pocket-friendly travel buddy.

Choosing between the Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS and Sony Cyber-shot W560 boils down to where you’ll take your camera and how you shoot. Both deliver 14MP images with similar sensor technology, but ergonomics, build, optics, and features define distinctly different experiences.

Dive into your typical shooting scenarios, ask which features will matter most in practice, and you’ll find this comparison a solid foundation for your next camera decision.

If you want to explore additional image samples or deep-dive into specialized testing, let me know - my years of hands-on evaluation can help guide your personalized gear choices.

Happy shooting!

End of article