Pentax Q vs Sony HX400V: A Hands-On Comparison of Two Unusual Imaging Solutions

When I compare the Pentax Q and Sony Cyber-shot HX400V, I’m faced with two very different cameras designed with distinct priorities and audiences in mind - yet both compact, bridge-style contenders with 1/2.3" sensors, each packing unique features that appeal to different photographic instincts. Having tested thousands of cameras over the years, with countless studio sessions, outdoor shoots, and field assignments, I approach this head-to-head armed with practical experience and a keen eye for the subtle trade-offs photographers routinely negotiate.

In this comprehensive comparison, we’ll dissect each camera’s design, sensor tech, autofocus capabilities, handling, lens options, and suitability across the varied landscape of photographic genres - from portraiture to wildlife, macro to video. Let’s roll up our sleeves and dig in.

Compact Camera Body and Ergonomics: Size Isn’t Everything, But It Matters

Right out of the gate, the Pentax Q impresses with its petite footprint: a trim 98x57x31mm and a weight of just 180g. Compare that to the Sony HX400V’s much chunkier 130x93x103mm and 660g heft, and you see two philosophies: Q’s focused on ultra-portability while HX400V leans towards a heftier, DSLR-esque grip for extended handling comfort.

The Pentax’s rangefinder-style mirrorless body is delightfully pocketable, but its small size can limit ergonomic comfort, especially for shooters with larger hands. The Sony bridge camera echoes a more traditional SLR shape with an extended grip, which is a boon for telephoto shooting where steadiness is critical.

Looking from above, Pentax simplifies its controls with minimal dials and buttons, which suits casual users dipping toes into manual exposure. Sony’s top plate, boasting a well-sized mode dial, control ring, and clearly labeled buttons, caters better to enthusiasts who want quick adjustments in the heat of the moment.

For travel photography or street shooters favoring inconspicuous setups, the Pentax Q’s stealthier presence is a major plus. In contrast, the HX400V’s size and shape signal ‘camera gear’ quickly, which can be a drawback for candid moments but advantageous for deliberate composition.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The 1/2.3” Sensor Fight

Both cameras share the same sensor size - 1/2.3” or roughly 6.17x4.55 mm. This sensor is common in compact cameras, offering compactness over image quality. However, Sony brings a 20MP BSI-CMOS sensor, whereas Pentax opts for a 12MP CMOS sensor with an anti-aliasing filter.

The pixel density difference is significant. While the HX400V’s 20MP sensor offers higher resolution (5184x3888px), it’s balanced against increased noise and sometimes softer details at high ISO because the pixels are smaller. The Pentax Q’s lower megapixel count means cleaner results at base ISOs and marginally better dynamic range (11.1 EV vs. lower unknown Sony rating). DxOMark awards the Q a 47 overall score, which is modest but respectable for an ultra-small sensor.

In my field tests shooting vibrant landscapes under natural daylight, the Sony produces punchy, crisp images with excellent detail resolve – especially at low to medium ISO (80-800). The Pentax images, however, appear slightly softer and flatter in comparison, though they retain usable detail without excessive noise up to ISO 800-1600. Beyond that, the Sony’s sensor tends to retain better clarity, a benefit in less-than-ideal lighting.

LCD Screens and Viewfinders: Real Estate and Experience

Both cameras pack a 3-inch LCD, but the Sony's panel is higher resolution (921K dots) compared to the Pentax’s 460K dots. This makes a visible difference when reviewing focus or exposure in the field, especially under bright conditions.

The Pentax Q lacks any type of viewfinder. I personally found this limiting outdoors, where bright sunlight can wash out the LCD, making composition guesswork. No eye-level finder means the photographer must shoot from the hip or compose on the small screen, which is tricky with action or precise framing.

Sony includes a 100% coverage electronic viewfinder, invaluable when shooting telephoto at full extension where camera shake is magnified. The EVF doesn’t break any resolution records, but it serves well for framing, especially in variable light.

Autofocus - Speed, Accuracy, and Flexibility in the Real World

The autofocus mechanics are where the rubber meets the road.

Pentax employs a 25-point contrast-detection system without phase detection or face/eye tracking, and no touch-based AF. This puts it at a disadvantage for dynamic subjects. In testing, the Q struggled to lock focus quickly on moving subjects; its continuous AF mode was slow and prone to hunting. This limits its practicality for wildlife or sports, where decisive focus speed is critical.

Sony utilizes a 9-point contrast-detection system with center-point emphasis, live view AF, and face detection, though no phase detection. While no advanced eye or animal tracking exists, the HX400V’s AF was noticeably snappier, locking quickly in good light even with long zooms deployed. Continuous AF doesn’t perform at a DSLR level but is respectable for a superzoom.

Sports shooters or wildlife enthusiasts who depend on critical focus would find the Sony’s autofocus serviceable and flexible, while the Pentax Q is more suited for static subjects - landscape, portraits with still poses, or macro where precision focusing is controlled.

Lens Ecosystem and Telephoto Reach: Small Sensor Superzoom Versus Interchangeable Lens

Pentax Q uses the Pentax Q mount with 8 native lenses ranging from wide to telephoto, but with a 5.8x crop factor due to its tiny sensor. This means a 50mm lens yields the field of view of about 290mm full-frame equivalent. Despite the crop, lenses are compact and sharp, and the system allows the user to swap optics as creative needs evolve.

Sony HX400V is a fixed lens superzoom stretching from 24-1200mm equivalent focal length, covering an extreme 50x zoom range in one integrated package. This alone gives immense framing versatility for everything from wide landscapes to faraway wildlife shots.

I appreciate the convenience of the Sony’s zoom, especially for travel or outdoor shoots where gear swapping is inconvenient. Yet the optical compromises and variable max aperture (f/2.8-f/6.3) mean lower light performance at long zoom lengths is tenuous; images can appear softer and more susceptible to camera shake past 600mm equivalent. The Pentax lenses, while requiring careful lens selection, tend to optically outperform the HX400V’s fixed zoom at matched focal lengths, especially wide open.

Burst Shooting and Shutter Range: Capturing the Action

The Pentax Q’s maximum shutter speed tops out at 1/2000s, while the HX400V extends to 1/4000s. The extra shutter speed range on the Sony allows better control with bright apertures or fast movement.

On continuous shooting, the Pentax is sluggish at 2 fps, adequate only for static scenes or minimal action. Conversely, Sony’s 10 fps burst mode upholds a decent buffer depth, making it far more adept at tracking moving subjects or sports scenarios in rapid succession.

This aligns with their autofocus capabilities and sensor performance - the HX400V is clearly the better action camera.

Build, Weather Resistance, and Durability

Neither camera boasts weather sealing, dustproofing, or freeze resistance - though given the Pentax Q’s ultra-small build and Sony’s bridge camera classification, this is expected.

Pentax has a minimalist, plastic-feeling chassis that is fine for casual urban or travel use but not built for rough, professional environments.

The Sony is built heavier, with a rubberized grip and more robust body paneling. I wouldn’t throw it in a rainstorm, but it is reassuringly solid for extended outdoor use.

Connectivity and Storage: Staying Current in 2024

The Pentax Q is barebones: no wireless, no Bluetooth, no NFC, and only USB 2.0 connectivity. This means managing images requires physical connection or removing the SD card.

Sony improves with built-in Wi-Fi for remote control, wireless file transfer, and integrates NFC for quick pairing. It also features GPS for geotagging - a big bonus for travel and outdoor shooters cataloging locations.

Both cameras accept SD/SDHC/SDXC cards, but Sony additionally supports Memory Stick Duo series, offering wider media flexibility.

Battery life favors the Sony at around 300 shots per charge versus the Pentax’s 230, giving real advantages for day-long shooting.

Video Capabilities: The Moving Image Factor

Video shooting is a notable differentiator.

The Pentax Q shoots Full HD 1080p at 30 fps using MPEG-4 and H.264 codecs, with no frame rate variety, no microphone input, and basic exposure control during recording.

The Sony HX400V supports multiple frame rates 60p, 60i, and 24p at 1080p with both MPEG-4 and AVCHD. It includes a microphone port - a rare feature in bridge cameras - allowing improved audio capture for serious videographers.

Neither offers 4K recording or in-body microphone monitoring, so professional video is limited, but the Sony clearly holds more appeal for hybrid shooters wanting flexibility in both stills and movies.

Genre-Specific Performance: Where Does Each Camera Shine?

• Portraits: The Pentax Q has little to offer in autofocus sophistication or large sensor advantages, but its interchangeable lens system can create pleasant bokeh on longer lenses. However, the Sony’s face detection and higher megapixels produce more detailed skin rendering for casual portraits.

• Landscapes: Both struggle somewhat due to sensor size, but Sony’s higher resolution and wider zoom lend flexibility. Neither has weather sealing, so outdoor conditions require care.

• Wildlife: Sony’s 50x superzoom and faster burst shooting dominate here. The Pentax Q’s slower AF and limited focal reach restrict wildlife applicability.

• Sports: HX400V shows clear superiority with faster AF, high frame rate, and better shutter speeds.

• Street: The Pentax’s small, discreet body wins for candid street photography. Sony is conspicuous but offers steady long-reach when distance shooting.

• Macro: Pentax’s lens lineup includes macro-capable optics, but no focus stacking or bracketing features on either.

• Night/Astro: Limited by small sensors, both have poor high ISO performance, but Pentax’s slightly better noise control helps in low light.

• Video: Sony is the better choice for HD video with mic input and advanced frame rates.

• Travel: Pentax wins on size/weight; Sony wins on zoom flexibility and battery life.

• Professional: Neither meets full professional standards, but Sony is more versatile overall.

Sample Images Speak Louder Than Specs

Pentax Q front Pentax Q screen back Sony HX400V front Sony HX400V screen back

Examining sample photos side-by-side under identical conditions captured the essence of each machine: the Pentax Q showed clean colors, modest resolution, and fine detail at base ISO, with limited dynamic range. The Sony HX400V delivered higher fidelity, more vibrant tones, and sharper edges, particularly noticeable in landscape and telephoto shots. Noise was more apparent on the Sony at elevated ISO settings but acceptable considering its superzoom reach.

Real-world experience backs this up - if you crave ultimate portability and don’t mind some compromise on speed and resolution, Pentax Q is a neat gadget. If you want a one-camera solution with long reach, better autofocus, and multimedia versatility, the Sony HX400V outpaces.

Final Scores: Objective Ratings Summary

From a purely performance-based perspective:

• Pentax Q overall score: 47
• Sony HX400V: Not directly tested by DxOmark but recognized as superior in resolution, autofocus speed, video features, and connectivity.

The Pentax Q lags on burst speed, autofocus, and lacks wireless features, but has respectable image quality given its size and sensor limitations. The Sony HX400V serves as a versatile superzoom bridge, fitting a range of disciplines with well-rounded features.

Who Should Pick Which? Making the Choice Clear

The Pentax Q is for you if:

• You prioritize ultra-lightweight, pocketable gear above all.
• You want the flexibility of interchangeable lenses in a tiny mirrorless package.
• Your primary use is casual portraits, travel snapshots, and static scenes.
• You can accept slower autofocus and modest video options.
• You’re drawn by quirky niche cameras or vintage-style compact systems.

The Sony HX400V suits photographers who:

• Need extreme telephoto reach without lens changes.
• Desire faster autofocus and higher frame rate shooting for action.
• Shoot hybrid stills and HD video with enhanced audio control.
• Value optional connectivity (Wi-Fi, GPS, NFC) for modern workflows.
• Prefer a single all-in-one travel zoom solution at a midrange price.

Concluding Thoughts from a Veteran Reviewer

The Pentax Q and Sony HX400V emerge not just as cameras but as statements about what compromises we, as photographers, are willing to embrace. Pentax Q champions compactness and system flexibility in a tiny footprint but trades raw speed and reach. The Sony HX400V offers extraordinary versatility in framing, autofocus, and multimedia, at the price of size and weight.

In my 15+ years evaluating gear, I find these are not direct competitors but complementary options - each excels in different shooting scenarios. The Q is a delightful ‘pocket rocket’ for limited gear scenarios, while the HX400V is the all-in-one trusty workhorse for those who want reach and features in one.

Neither is perfect, but both are interesting tools that answer particular photographic calls - choose the one that aligns best with your style and shooting landscapes. You deserve no less.

If you'd like detailed sample images or side-by-side field test videos comparing these two, stay tuned or hit me up for personalized shoot reports. My testing approach always includes controlled brightness, standardized color targets, and real-world shooting challenges to provide the clearest lens on camera performance.

Happy shooting!

END