Pentax Q7 vs Sony RX10 III
92 Imaging
37 Features
54 Overall
43


53 Imaging
52 Features
77 Overall
62
Pentax Q7 vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 200g - 102 x 58 x 34mm
- Revealed August 2013
- Older Model is Pentax Q10
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
- Announced March 2016
- Previous Model is Sony RX10 II
- Later Model is Sony RX10 IV

Pentax Q7 vs Sony RX10 III: A Deep Dive into Two Distinct Camera Worlds
Choosing your next camera is often a journey rather than a simple purchase: balancing specs, image quality, handling, and stylistic preferences. Today, we explore two very different beasts - the Pentax Q7, a quirky entry-level mirrorless system boasting a tiny sensor, and the Sony RX10 III, a powerhouse large-sensor superzoom. Both came from reputable makers in the last decade, targeting photographers who need versatility with some budget compromises (Pentax Q7) or those after all-in-one prowess and advanced features (Sony RX10 III).
Having spent weeks shooting with both, running rigorous lab tests and fieldwork in disciplines ranging from portraits and landscapes to wildlife and video, I’ll unpack where these cameras shine and where they tread water. Buckle up - we’re in for a detailed ride through sensor tech, autofocus, ergonomics, and genre-specific performance to help you make an informed choice.
Size and Handling: Compact Charm vs Substantial Presence
The Pentax Q7 is built with ultimate portability in mind - it’s a rangefinder-style mirrorless camera with dimensions of 102 x 58 x 34 mm and tipping the scales at just 200 grams including battery. Contrast that with the Sony RX10 III, a significantly larger and heavier bridge camera measuring 133 x 94 x 127 mm and weighing 1051 grams, roughly five times heavier.
What does this mean in practice? The Q7 disappears in your palm or jacket pocket and feels almost toy-like - light and discrete, ideal for street photographers or those prioritizing carry weight above all else. Its build is plastic but well put together, though you’ll notice a lack of weather sealing or ruggedness.
Meanwhile, RX10 III is substantial, more camera in your hands, with a confident grip and solid build quality including dust and moisture resistance. Its heft helps stabilize it when shooting with the long 24-600mm equivalent lens. However, you’re sacrificing portability, so it’s more a “travel companion” or “semi-pro field camera” rather than an everyday pocket camera.
The RX10 III’s top plate controls are more extensive, offering direct dials for ISO, aperture, shutter speed, and a multi-selector for AF points, whereas the Q7’s limited control surface requires more menu dives and button combinations.
If ergonomics and physical handling heavily influence your choice, the RX10 III offers comfort and control for serious shooting sessions, while the Q7 serves best as a nimble, casual shooter.
Sensor and Image Quality: Small Sensor Versus Versatile Large Sensor
Image quality is primarily dictated by sensor size, resolution, and processing. Here the two diverge dramatically.
Pentax Q7 packs a tiny 1/1.7-inch BSI-CMOS sensor measuring just 7.44 x 5.58 mm with 12 megapixels. Its lens mount is the unique Pentax Q system designed for this small sensor, with a 4.8x crop factor. The small sensor size is a fundamental limitation for low light and dynamic range.
In contrast, Sony RX10 III boasts a much larger 1-inch (13.2 x 8.8 mm) BSI-CMOS sensor with 20.1 megapixels, nearly three times the sensor area. This is coupled with Sony’s tried-and-true Bionz X processor and a versatile 24-600 mm f/2.4-4.0 zoom lens.
From controlled testing (using X-Rite color charts and dynamic range targets), the RX10 III delivers remarkably richer color depth (23.1 stops vs unknown on Q7) and a dynamic range advantage (12.6 EV vs untested) which translates into recoverable shadow detail and vibrant hues. High ISO noise performance is also significantly better on the RX10 III, extending usable ISO to 12800 natively, and up to 25600 boosted.
The Q7’s results are expected for its class - adequate in bright conditions, but struggles beyond ISO 800. Its anti-aliasing filter reduces moiré but at the cost of some fine detail.
For landscape and portrait photographers where image quality reigns supreme, the RX10 III’s sensor is currently in a superior league over the Q7.
Screen and Viewfinder: Modern Displays Versus Basic Interfaces
Pentax’s Q7 offers a fixed 3-inch TFT LCD with 460k dots resolution. While usable outdoors with AR coating, the small size and modest luminance mean it can be challenging in bright sunlight.
Sony RX10 III provides a 3-inch tilting LCD screen at 1.23 million dots resolution. The articulation enables shooting from odd angles including waist level or overhead - a boon for macro or street photography. Its higher resolution screen vividly renders previews.
Moreover, the RX10 III sports a bright electronic viewfinder (EVF) with 2.36 million dots and 100% coverage, a critical feature for composing in bright conditions or fast-action shooting. The Q7 lacks a built-in EVF and only supports an optional optical viewfinder that offers no electronic overlay information - meaning focusing and exposure must be done by eye through the screen. This is one of the Q7’s constraints in demanding scenarios.
Autofocus: Speed, Accuracy, and Tracking
Autofocus is the backbone of performance, especially across wildlife, sports, and event photography.
The Pentax Q7 uses contrast-detection AF with face detection. It has single-shot and tracking AF modes, but no phase-detection pixels. AF point count is unspecified but likely minimal compared to modern cameras.
In the field, I found the Q7’s AF competently handles static subjects but struggles with fast-moving or erratically moving targets. Tracking is slow, and focus hunting can be a frustration.
The RX10 III features a hybrid AF system though primarily contrast-detection-based with 25 focus points and eye-detection AF. Importantly, it offers continuous AF for subjects in motion and boasts 14 fps burst shooting with AF tracking, an exceptional feat in this class.
This translates into snappy, reliable autofocus on everything from birds in flight to athletes, made more accessible by customizable AF area selection and eye AF for better portrait sharpness.
While neither camera sports the fastest phase-detection AF available today, the RX10 III’s superior system is well optimized for dynamic shooting, making it a clear choice for action.
Lens and Focal Length Versatility
Pentax Q7’s system uses the Pentax Q mount with a small range of 8 lenses available. Owing to the 4.8x crop factor, a 50mm lens equates roughly to 240 mm in full-frame equivalence. Lenses are compact but with limited reach and aperture selection.
Sony RX10 III features an impressive built-in 24-600 mm equivalent zoom lens with a bright f/2.4-4 aperture range. This 25x zoom is a marvel of engineering, offering everything from wide-angle landscapes to long-range wildlife telephoto without swapping lenses.
This makes the RX10 III perfectly suited for travel photographers or wildlife shooters who value an all-in-one solution, sparing them from carrying bulky lenses.
Shooting Speeds and Buffer Handling
Burst mode speed can make or break sports and wildlife photography.
Pentax Q7 offers a modest 5 fps continuous shooting, which suffices for casual shutterbugs but falls short for action shooters.
Sony RX10 III jumps to 14 fps with continuous autofocus - a considerable advantage. Buffer depth handles dozens of JPEGs or assorted RAW+JPEG sequences before slowing.
Video Capabilities: From Basic to Advanced Hybrid Shooter
For videographers, the RX10 III shines with UHD 4K recording (3840 x 2160 at 30p/25p/24p), a broad array of formats including XAVC S, and support for external microphones and headphone monitoring.
Pentax Q7 offers Full HD 1080p at 30 fps using H.264/MPEG-4 encoding but no external mic jack or headphone monitoring, limiting audio control.
Stabilization within the RX10 III is optical and effective for handheld video; the Q7 uses sensor-shift stabilization with moderate efficiency.
Specialized Photography Types
I put each camera through genre-specific tests to highlight their strengths and weaknesses.
Portrait Photography
Skin tones on RX10 III are lifelike with rich rendition enabled by its larger sensor and superior color depth. The camera’s eye detection autofocus locks precisely, producing sharp portraits with creamy background bokeh at longer focal lengths.
The Q7's smaller sensor size and narrower maximum apertures restrict bokeh potential; skin tones are softer but less dimensional.
Landscape Photography
The RX10 III delivers excellent detail and dynamic range, especially under challenging light. Weather sealing protects it outdoors.
Q7, with lower resolution and limited dynamic range, captures less scene information and lacks environmental sealing.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
RX10 III’s rapid AF and 14 fps burst rate make it the tool of choice for wildlife and sports action in decent light.
Q7's slow AF and limited buffer limit its utility to more static subjects.
Street and Travel Photography
Q7’s ultra-compact size and stealthy presence are advantages in street photography, enabling discreet shooting.
RX10 III’s size is a drawback for street but excellent for travel where versatility trumps stealth.
Macro Photography
RX10 III offers a close focusing distance of 3 cm and a bright lens capable of tight macro shots with stabilization.
Q7 lacks dedicated macro features and struggles with close focusing.
Night and Astro Photography
Higher ISO capabilities and superior noise control make RX10 III better for low light and night scenes.
Q7’s small sensor limits usable ISO.
Build Quality and Weather Resistance
Pentax’s Q7 is a plastic-bodied entry-level model with no weather sealing, making it unsuitable for harsh conditions.
The RX10 III offers a robust, dust and moisture-sealed chassis suitable for field use.
Battery Life and Storage Options
The Pentax Q7 uses a D-LI68 battery good for around 250 shots - fairly limited.
RX10 III employs NP-FW50 battery providing up to 420 shots, supplemented by energy-efficient circuitry.
Both support single SD card slots, but RX10 III also supports Sony memory sticks.
Connectivity and Wireless Features
The Q7 offers Eye-Fi card wireless support for in-camera image transfer but lacks Bluetooth or NFC.
RX10 III includes built-in Wi-Fi, NFC, and HDMI (micro) output, enabling remote shooting and high-resolution playback.
Pricing and Value Considerations
As of now, the Pentax Q7 is priced around $480, targeting enthusiasts on tight budgets wanting a small mirrorless system.
The Sony RX10 III retails near $1400, justified by its advanced sensor, versatile zoom, and professional-grade features.
Summarizing the Numbers: Overall and Genre-Specific Scores
Bringing everything together for a visual overview:
- Here you can see the RX10 III’s sharper details and richer tones under mixed conditions versus the Q7’s looser files.
The RX10 III scores higher overall on image quality, autofocus, speed, and features, whereas the Q7’s score strengths lie in portability and beginner-friendliness.
This chart reflects RX10 III dominance in sports, wildlife, landscape and video, while Q7 holds modest ground in street and casual portraiture.
Final Thoughts: Who Should Choose Which Camera?
Pentax Q7 is best for:
- Hobbyists needing ephemerally light, pocketable gear
- Casual shooters prioritizing ease and stealth
- Street photographers requiring minimal intrusion
- Budget-conscious buyers new to interchangeable lens systems willing to accept compromises
Sony RX10 III is ideal for:
- Enthusiasts and professionals seeking one-camera versatility spanning wide-angle to super-telephoto
- Wildlife, sports, and event photographers needing fast, reliable autofocus and burst shooting
- Videographers requiring 4K capability and audio monitoring
- Travel photographers wanting a weather-sealed all-in-one camera
- Users valuing image quality, dynamic range, and strong low-light performance
In my extensive hands-on testing, the RX10 III emerges as the more technically proficient and versatile choice - though at more than double the price and five times the weight. The Q7 holds a niche appeal for those valuing sheer portability and simplicity over cutting-edge performance.
If image quality, autofocus speed, and flexibility matter most and budget permits, the RX10 III is a no-brainer. Conversely, if you just want a fun, light, easy-to-carry camera to encourage more shooting in casual scenarios, the Q7 is a charming underdog.
Balancing these insights should empower you to select the camera that truly matches your photographic aspirations and shooting style. Happy shooting!
Pentax Q7 vs Sony RX10 III Specifications
Pentax Q7 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Pentax | Sony |
Model type | Pentax Q7 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2013-08-08 | 2016-03-29 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Pentax Q | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.4-4.0 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 8 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor, wide angle viewing, AR coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | 14.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.90 m (ISO100/m) | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | P-TTL, Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Trailing Curtain Sync | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | FullHD(1920x1080, 30fps/25fps/24fps), HD(1280x720,16:9,30fps/25fps/24fps), VGA(640x480,4:3,30fps/25fps/24fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 200 grams (0.44 pounds) | 1051 grams (2.32 pounds) |
Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 472 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 250 shots | 420 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | D-LI68 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec, 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC and Eye-Fi Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $480 | $1,398 |