Pentax WG-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III
93 Imaging
38 Features
34 Overall
36
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c8b5/8c8b5a43b8dd05db247331e718ba790ba4a76f83" alt="Pentax WG-10 front Pentax WG-10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0394/c039434b1259b0983aa2fa353205f299c35090eb" alt="Ricoh GR Digital III front Ricoh GR Digital III front"
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Pentax WG-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 167g - 116 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced June 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Successor is Ricoh GR Digital IV
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Pentax WG-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
Following is a detailed review of the Pentax WG-10 and Ricoh GR Digital III, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Pentax and Ricoh. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the WG-10 (14MP) and GR Digital III (10MP) and the WG-10 (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") have different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The WG-10 was introduced 3 years after the GR Digital III which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the WG-10 matches up against the GR Digital III in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Pentax WG-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Pentax WG-10 and Ricoh GR Digital III. The whole galleries are available at Pentax WG-10 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-10 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
WG-10 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2013 | ![]() | July 2009 | More modern by 48 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Pentax WG-10
GR Digital III | WG-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax WG-10 and Ricoh GR Digital III
WG-10 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch screen |
Pentax WG-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Pentax WG-10 offers outer dimensions of 116mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Ricoh GR Digital III has sizing of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Contrast the Pentax WG-10 and Ricoh GR Digital III in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the WG-10 and the GR Digital III.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a247f/a247f4b6f71bdcc450050d0423c796bc67d1791d" alt="Pentax WG-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison Pentax WG-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-10 and GR Digital III is 93 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8d10/a8d108f1e2839ddbfbb67195713e3b834182a08b" alt="Pentax WG-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison Pentax WG-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison"
Pentax WG-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizes just by going through specifications. The pic below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-10 and GR Digital III.
Plainly, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The WG-10 with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more challenging and the Pentax WG-10 will produce more detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures more aggressively. The more modern WG-10 provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ed01/8ed014958317e7b2fdb4a1528c29a7edbac056ce" alt="Pentax WG-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison Pentax WG-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison"
Pentax WG-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97230/972309f5712a777ab4898038d5c783c742e456d2" alt="Pentax WG-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison Pentax WG-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Pentax WG-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
Pentax WG-10 | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Pentax | Ricoh |
Model type | Pentax WG-10 | Ricoh GR Digital III |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2013-06-21 | 2009-07-27 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/1.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 0.7fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 1.20 m | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 167g (0.37 pounds) | 208g (0.46 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 116 x 59 x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 260 shots | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $0 | $399 |