Pentax WG-10 vs Sony W570
93 Imaging
38 Features
34 Overall
36


96 Imaging
38 Features
25 Overall
32
Pentax WG-10 vs Sony W570 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 167g - 116 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched June 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.6-6.3) lens
- 116g - 91 x 52 x 19mm
- Released January 2011

Pentax WG-10 vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W570: Compact Camera Smackdown for Practical Photographers
In the ever-evolving world of point-and-shoot cameras, the Pentax WG-10 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W570 stand as two intriguing contenders from the early 2010s. Both are compact, consumer-friendly cameras aimed at casual to enthusiast shooters who want straightforward, yet capable, imaging companions. But beneath their affordable price tags and pocketable frames lie two quite different philosophies and use cases.
As someone who has tested thousands of cameras, ranging from flagship DSLRs to rugged compacts, I approach this review as an informed photographer first, techy reviewer second. My goal: cut through spec sheets and marketing haze to deliver insights that matter for real-world shooting - so you can decide which camera, if either, deserves a spot in your gear bag.
Let’s embark on a detailed journey, punctuated by careful hands-on evaluation, direct feature comparisons, and practical performance tests. Along the way, I’ll bust myths, highlight win-win features, and flag unavoidable compromises.
Size, Handling & Ergonomics: Muscle or Minimalism?
When you’re choosing a compact camera, size and how it feels in your hands can make or break the shooting experience. Are you lugging it every day? Shooting in adventurous conditions? Or just want a camera that disappears in a pocket?
Right off the bat, the Sony W570 flaunts a smaller, sleeker ultracompact profile at 91x52x19mm and a featherweight 116g. Its slim line and rounded edges make it a natural for everyday carry - think jeans pocket or small purse. For casual street shooters or snapshot lovers, this is the ideal size.
Pentax WG-10, on the other hand, is chunkier and more substantial: 116x59x29mm, 167g. It looks and feels rugged - a deliberate choice given its extensive environmental sealing. The WG-10 is designed for action, travel, and rough handling. Grip is firm and secure, with a somewhat textured body that resists slipping even with wet or gloved hands.
Side note: The Pentax's weight and bulk aren’t overkill when you consider how many outdoor conditions it’s built to endure (more on that later). Yet, the Sony’s thinner footprint wins points for those who prize pure portability and discretion on the street.
Top Controls & Interface: Touching the Right Buttons
Ease of control, button placement, and the intuitive feel of top dials can turn an OK camera into a pleasurable one during fast-paced shooting.
The WG-10’s design reflects its rugged character with pronounced shutter buttons and well-sized mode dials for gloved or adventurous fingers. Controls feel tactile and positively clicky - reassuring when operating under adverse conditions.
Sony’s W570 leans towards minimalism: small, flush buttons and limited physical control. The lack of dedicated manual controls reflects its market positioning: casual users who rely primarily on auto modes. The shutter button is a bit tiny but well placed, ideal for point-and-shoot snapshooting without fuss.
Neither camera sports touchscreens - not surprising for models from this period - and both use fixed 2.7-inch LCDs. More on that next.
LCD Screen & Viewfinding: Seeing Clearly - or Squinting?
A camera’s rear LCD is your main window for framing and reviewing images, so brightness, resolution, and screen type matter a lot for outdoor usability.
Pentax’s WG-10 offers a widescreen TFT LCD with an anti-reflective coating. While modest at 230k dots, the screen’s readability is quite decent under broad daylight thanks to the coating, preventing washout and frustrating glare.
Sony’s W570 uses a “Clear Photo LCD” technology, also 230k dots, but with a slightly warmer color rendering and somewhat less anti-glare resilience. Indoors and shaded environments, it’s perfectly serviceable - but I found it more challenging to compose in bright sunlight.
Neither camera has electronic viewfinders - quite standard for compacts in this class - so you’re working primarily with the rear screen. Pentax’s wider screen aspect ratio and anti-reflectiveness definitely edge out the W570 in outdoors framing and quick composition.
Sensor Technology & Image Quality: Peeling Back the Pixels
Here’s where things get interesting. Both cameras use 1/2.3” CCD sensors - a modest size by modern standards but common in compact cameras of their time. They differ in resolution and ISO capabilities, which shape image quality.
The Pentax WG-10 has a 14-megapixel sensor with a native ISO range of 125 to 6400. In contrast, Sony’s W570 features a slightly higher resolution 16 megapixels but caps ISO at 3200.
In practice, those extra megapixels on the W570 translate to finer detail in well-lit conditions, but come at the expense of slightly higher noise at mid to high ISOs.
The WG-10’s sensor, while lower in resolution, delivers better balance in noise management especially when shooting above ISO 800 - an impressive feat given the limitations of small CCD sensors.
Dynamic range is rather narrow for both, with pronounced shadow crush and highlight clipping noticeable when shooting high-contrast scenes. Neither camera offers RAW support, meaning image editing flexibility post-shot is constrained by the JPEG processing.
My hands-on tests in daylight landscapes confirmed sharper overall results from the Sony W570, but with Pentax’s sensor producing cleaner files at ISO 800 and above. Noise begins to dominate above ISO 1600 in both models.
For portrait and skin tone rendering - a critical test of sensor and processing pipeline - the WG-10’s color profile is warmer and more natural, while Sony’s can venture towards cooler, slightly oversaturated hues.
Lens & Zoom Capability: Getting Closer to the Action
Beyond sensor prowess, the optical character of the lens plays a pivotal role in image aesthetics and composition range.
- Pentax WG-10 features a 28-140mm equivalent (5x zoom), max aperture F3.5-5.5
- Sony W570 has a 25-125mm equivalent zoom, max aperture F2.6-6.3
Pentax’s zoom range is a standard all-rounder - wide enough for landscapes, tight enough for portraits and casual telephoto. The max aperture is modest, which impacts low-light and depth-of-field control.
Sony’s lens shines in its brighter wide aperture of F2.6 at the short end, giving a slight edge for low-light snapshots and subject isolation, although the telephoto end closes down to F6.3 which is a bit restrictive.
Macro focusing distance is another noteworthy point: WG-10 excels with a close focus ability as near as 1cm, perfect for bug and small object photography. The Sony’s macro limit lingers at 5cm.
If you’re craving hands-on creative control over focus and blur, WG-10 also offers manual focus - a rarity in compacts here - whereas Sony locks you into autofocus only.
Autofocus & Shooting Performance: Speed, Accuracy & Burst
What’s the point of pixels if you miss focus or the decisive moment? Let’s evaluate autofocus (AF) and shooting speed.
Both cameras use contrast-detection AF with 9 focus points, but Pentax includes face detection, while Sony does not.
- Pentax WG-10: single AF + continuous AF, face detection helps nail focus on portraits and moving subjects. However, AF speed is leisurely due to entry-level processor and sensor readout. Burst shooting clocks in at 0.7 fps - very slow by modern standards.
- Sony W570: single AF only, no face detection, but optimizes for speed with 1.0 fps continuous shooting. Again, slow compared to DSLRs or later compacts.
In practical shooting, WG-10’s face detection gave me more success capturing family portraits with tack-sharp eyes, even with some movement. The Sony’s simpler AF was less reliable in difficult lighting or with fast subjects.
Neither camera can be called a sports shooter, but for casual snaps and landscape/portrait usage, the AF systems are adequate.
Durability & Environmental Sealing: Ready for Adventure?
Here’s a stark differentiation: Pentax markets the WG-10 as a rugged, waterproof camera built to endure environmental abuse. Sony’s W570 is a delicate ultracompact without such protections.
Pentax WG-10 boasts dustproof, waterproof (down to 10 meters), shockproof (builds to withstand a 1.5 meter drop), crushproof up to 100kgf, and freezeproof to -10°C. It’s specifically built for outdoor photographers, adventure seekers, and underwater snapshots.
Sony W570 lacks any official weather resistance or shockproof qualities. It’s designed mainly as a casual day-to-day shooter not meant for extreme conditions.
If your photographic lifestyle involves trails, beaches, pools, or unpredictable environments, WG-10’s ruggedness is a huge selling point.
Battery Life & Storage: Keeping You Shooting All Day
No one likes battery anxiety mid-shoot.
Pentax WG-10 uses a rechargeable D-LI92 battery offering around 260 shots per charge - modest but manageable with spares.
Sony W570’s battery specs are less clearly documented but relies on a NP-BN1 battery, which from experience yields approximately 200-250 shots. So roughly comparable.
Both cameras accept SD-type cards, with Sony adding compatibility with Memory Stick Duo formats. Storage speeds won’t break records but are adequate for casual users.
Video Capabilities: Moving Pictures in HD
Videographers might not expect stellar video from these compact still cameras, yet both offer HD recording.
Pentax WG-10 shoots 1280x720 HD at 60 or 30fps, encoded in MPEG-4 and H.264 - a respectable option for casual video capture. It has timelapse recording, a nice creative bonus.
Sony W570 records 1280x720 at 30fps, also in MPEG-4. It skips timelapse.
Neither camera sports microphone or headphone jacks, so audio control is limited. Neither supports 4K video or advanced video features.
Overall, WG-10 edges video features with 60fps option and timelapse.
Connectivity & Interface: Sharing the Snapshots
Both cameras offer Eye-Fi card compatibility for wireless image transfers, plus USB 2.0 and HDMI ports for wired connections.
No Bluetooth, NFC, or built-in Wi-Fi - understandable given release dates.
Sony’s inclusion of multiple card formats adds flexibility, while Pentax demands SD/SDHC/SDXC cards.
Image Samples & Real-World Results: Putting Pixels to the Test
Theory is fine, but hands-on shooting counts most.
I shot a variety of scenes side-by-side to compare image character:
- Portraits: WG-10 produced pleasing skin tones and smooth bokeh, aided by face detection for sharp focus on eyes. Sony’s images were sharper but risked slightly cooler tones and busy backgrounds due to smaller aperture and no face detect.
- Landscapes: Sony’s higher res captured more fine detail in textures, while Pentax’s files were slightly softer but more forgiving color-wise.
- Macro: WG-10’s infamous 1cm macro focus let me get intimate with flower petals and insects, a joy that Sony’s 5cm macro couldn’t approach.
- Low Light/Night: Noise rose quickly on both, but Pentax’s sensor and IS combination gave marginally better handheld shots, especially with slower shutter speeds.
- Action: Both struggled with fast wildlife or sports, with slow AF and low burst fps making them poor choices for serious motion capture.
Performance Ratings & Genre Suitability: Scoring the Contenders
For a quick at-a-glance performance and usability overview:
Category | Pentax WG-10 | Sony W570 |
---|---|---|
Image Quality | 6.5 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
Autofocus | 5 / 10 | 4 / 10 |
Handling | 7 / 10 | 6 / 10 |
Video | 6.5 / 10 | 5.5 / 10 |
Durability | 9 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
Portability | 5.5 / 10 | 8 / 10 |
Battery Life | 6 / 10 | 6 / 10 |
Drilling down by photo genre yields nuanced results:
- Portraits: Pentax slightly better for focus and natural tones
- Landscape: Sony leads in resolution but not weather resistance
- Wildlife/Sports: Neither excelling; Pentax edges with face detect
- Street: Sony best for size and discretion
- Macro: Pentax unquestioned winner
- Night/Astro: Both limited, Pentax barely ahead
- Video: Pentax with HD 60fps option
- Travel: Pentax for rugged trips; Sony for light packing
- Professional: Neither suitable as main tool, but Pentax can be fun secondary
Final Thoughts and Recommendations: Who Should Buy Which?
Pentax WG-10
If your photography brush regularly touches the outdoors - think hiking, beach days, snorkeling, or family adventures where the occasional drop, splash, or freeze is common - Pentax’s WG-10 is built with you in mind. Its ruggedness, waterproofing, excellent macro abilities, and balanced image quality make it a practical, no-fuss shooter designed to survive life’s messier moments. Just temper expectations on autofocus speed and resolution.
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W570
For seekers of compact elegance who prioritize portability and sharp daylight image detail for casual shooting in controlled environments, Sony’s W570 fits well. It shines as a pocketable urban companion or everyday snapshot machine but without weatherproofing or rugged durability. Its lower low-light performance and limited focus features mean it suits casual photographers who prefer simplicity over adventure.
Measuring these Cameras with My Own Testing Lens
During reviews, I use my standardized shooting scenarios, from daylight landscapes and close macro to low-light portraits and action snapshots. Focus speed tests, battery endurance under mixed shooting, and real-world usability trials - including pocket carry tests and quick-draw shooting - inform my balanced verdicts.
Neither the Pentax WG-10 nor Sony W570 will replace a DSLR or mirrorless system for professional-level work, but both are earnest budget players in the affordable compact realm. Pick based on your lifestyle and shooting priorities, not marketing hype.
Summary Table for Quick Reference
Feature | Pentax WG-10 | Sony W570 |
---|---|---|
Release Date | June 2013 | January 2011 |
Sensor | 1/2.3" CCD, 14MP | 1/2.3" CCD, 16MP |
Max ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lens Range (35mm equiv.) | 28-140mm, f/3.5-5.5 | 25-125mm, f/2.6-6.3 |
Macro Distance | 1 cm | 5 cm |
AF Features | Face detection, contrast AF | Contrast AF only |
Continuous shooting | 0.7 fps | 1.0 fps |
Image Stabilization | Sensor-shift | Optical |
Video | 720p @ 60fps + Timelapse | 720p @ 30fps |
Weather Resistance | Fully rugged (waterproof etc) | None |
Screen Size/Resolution | 2.7", 230k, anti-reflective | 2.7", 230k, Clear Photo LCD |
Weight | 167g | 116g |
Battery Life | 260 shots | ~200-250 shots estimated |
Connectivity | Eye-Fi, USB 2.0, HDMI | Eye-Fi, USB 2.0, HDMI |
Price (at release) | Budget | Budget |
Final Verdict
If you want a no-nonsense, hard-wearing, all-terrain companion for modestly serious outdoor photography, Pentax WG-10 is your go-to - a camera that won’t quit when you accidentally drop it in the stream or get caught in a sandstorm.
If your priority is a featherweight, easy-to-carry camera for casual snaps mostly in safe urban or indoor environments - and you want a tad sharper daylight images - the Sony W570 remains a sensible, user-friendly pick.
Whichever you pick, you’re getting a slice of early 2010s compact camera technology with all its strengths and limitations. Neither will blow professional minds, but both offer trustworthy pocketable fun for fans of straightforward photography.
Happy shooting - and remember, the best camera is the one you actually carry and use!
This review is based on extensive hands-on use, direct comparative testing under varied conditions, and personal insights accrued over 15+ years of camera evaluation.
Pentax WG-10 vs Sony W570 Specifications
Pentax WG-10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W570 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Pentax | Sony |
Model type | Pentax WG-10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W570 |
Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2013-06-21 | 2011-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.6-6.3 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | Clear Photo LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 2s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter speed | 0.7 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 1.20 m | 3.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 167g (0.37 pounds) | 116g (0.26 pounds) |
Dimensions | 116 x 59 x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 91 x 52 x 19mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 260 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $0 | $159 |