Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh WG-50
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Portability
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
Pentax WG-3 GPS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced July 2013
Ricoh WG-50
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced May 2017
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh WG-50, both Waterproof cameras by rivals Pentax and Ricoh. The image resolution of the WG-3 GPS (16MP) and the WG-50 (16MP) is pretty close and they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-3 GPS was introduced 4 years prior to the WG-50 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a full comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the WG-3 GPS grades vs the WG-50 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Pentax WG-3 GPS & Ricoh WG-50. The whole galleries are provided at Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery & Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Ricoh WG-50
| WG-3 GPS | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
| WG-50 | WG-3 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2017 |  | July 2013 | More modern by 46 months |
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Ricoh WG-50
| WG-3 GPS | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Pentax WG-3 GPS provides external measurements of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-50 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Take a look at the Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh WG-50 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the WG-3 GPS against the WG-50.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-3 GPS and WG-50 is 90 and 91 respectively.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to see the difference in sensor sizes merely by viewing specifications. The picture here should offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-3 GPS and WG-50.
To sum up, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same MP so you can expect comparable quality of images but you should always consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The more aged WG-3 GPS will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax WG-3 GPS Portrait photography details
Ricoh WG-50 Portrait photography details
you can focus manually
decent MP (16 megapixels)
offers face detection autofocus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
manual focus
good MP (16 megapixels)
provides face detection autofocus
no manual control
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Street photography with Pentax WG-3 GPS
Street photography with Ricoh WG-50
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
screen is fixed
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
more heavy than competition in class (238 grams)
image stabilization (Digital)
environment proofing
no moving screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Sports photography with Pentax WG-3 GPS
Sports photography with Ricoh WG-50
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
weather proofing
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
terrible battery life (240 per charge)
lack of phase detect autofocus
image stabilization (Digital)
good MP (16MP)
provides tracking autofocus
environment proofing
no shutter priority
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax WG-3 GPS Travel photography details
Ricoh WG-50 Travel photography details
weather proofing
decent MP (16MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
terrible battery life (240 shots)
more heavy than competition in class (238 grams)
screen isn't selfie friendly
environment proofing
good MP (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
decently wide (28mm)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax WG-3 GPS Landscape photography info
Ricoh WG-50 Landscape photography info
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
weather proofing
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
terrible battery life (240 per charge)
manual focus
decently wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
good MP (16 megapixels)
environment proofing
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
no manual control
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax WG-3 GPS Vlogging highlights
Ricoh WG-50 Vlogging highlights
reasonably wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no external microphone port
more heavy than competition in class (238g)
decently wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
provides face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of external mic port
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
| Pentax WG-3 GPS | Ricoh WG-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Pentax | Ricoh |
| Model type | Pentax WG-3 GPS | Ricoh WG-50 |
| Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2013-07-19 | 2017-05-24 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.40 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 238 gr (0.52 lb) | 193 gr (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photos | 300 photos |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $350 | $280 |
