Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh CX6
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80d48/80d4829e27b270a372b152ea9a2e896de139bf15" alt="Pentax WG-3 front Pentax WG-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e97a/8e97a2b8e35be9022dd0ad6f05fcaa417bba57e7" alt="Ricoh CX6 front Ricoh CX6 front"
92 Imaging
34 Features
38 Overall
35
Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh CX6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released July 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 201g - 104 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched November 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh CX6 Overview
Here is a thorough analysis of the Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh CX6, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Pentax and Ricoh. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the WG-3 (16MP) and CX6 (10MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The WG-3 was announced 21 months later than the CX6 making them a generation apart from each other. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the WG-3 grades vs the CX6 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh CX6 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Pentax WG-3 & Ricoh CX6. The whole galleries are viewable at Pentax WG-3 Gallery & Ricoh CX6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Ricoh CX6
WG-3 | CX6 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2013 | ![]() | November 2011 | Fresher by 21 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX6 over the Pentax WG-3
CX6 | WG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+770k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 and Ricoh CX6
WG-3 | CX6 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly display |
Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh CX6 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Pentax WG-3 enjoys outside measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Ricoh CX6 has measurements of 104mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs).
Analyze the Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh CX6 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the WG-3 and the CX6.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0794d/0794d8834de47c06b93edeb9173e2065661008ab" alt="Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh CX6 size comparison Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh CX6 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-3 and CX6 is 90 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47f18/47f18b99985d4f2dcfda67c7ae0537ba252f33e4" alt="Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh CX6 top view buttons comparison Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh CX6 top view buttons comparison"
Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh CX6 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizing purely by checking out specs. The graphic underneath may give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-3 and CX6.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Pentax WG-3 to show extra detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The newer WG-3 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1097/a1097b307191e322f65d09662bbeb2d7a24d1f7f" alt="Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh CX6 sensor size comparison Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh CX6 sensor size comparison"
Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh CX6 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/706b9/706b9c9e1ef305e6afbeec353737714a13968d5a" alt="Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh CX6 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh CX6 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh CX6 Specifications
Pentax WG-3 | Ricoh CX6 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Pentax | Ricoh |
Model type | Pentax WG-3 | Ricoh CX6 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2013-07-19 | 2011-11-15 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 1,230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | Sony WhiteMagic VGA LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.40 m | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lb) | 201 grams (0.44 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 104 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 images | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | DB-100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $300 | $595 |