Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung HZ50W
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
70 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung HZ50W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched July 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 426g - 116 x 83 x 91mm
- Revealed May 2010
- Additionally Known as WB5500
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung HZ50W Overview
Here is a detailed overview of the Pentax WG-3 and Samsung HZ50W, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Pentax and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-3 (16MP) and the HZ50W (14MP) is pretty well matched and they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-3 was manufactured 3 years later than the HZ50W and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Pentax WG-3 being a Compact camera and the Samsung HZ50W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a short summation of how the WG-3 grades vs the HZ50W for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung HZ50W Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Pentax WG-3 & Samsung HZ50W. The entire galleries are viewable at Pentax WG-3 Gallery & Samsung HZ50W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Samsung HZ50W
| WG-3 | HZ50W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2013 |  | May 2010 | Fresher by 40 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ50W over the Pentax WG-3
| HZ50W | WG-3 |
|---|
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 and Samsung HZ50W
| WG-3 | HZ50W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung HZ50W Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Pentax WG-3 enjoys exterior dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ50W has sizing of 116mm x 83mm x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") having a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).
Compare the Pentax WG-3 and Samsung HZ50W in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the WG-3 versus the HZ50W.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-3 and HZ50W is 90 and 70 respectively.
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung HZ50W Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing simply by looking at a spec sheet. The photograph here might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-3 and HZ50W.
Clearly, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You can expect the Pentax WG-3 to give more detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more modern WG-3 provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Pentax WG-3 vs Samsung HZ50W Specifications
| Pentax WG-3 | Samsung HZ50W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model type | Pentax WG-3 | Samsung HZ50W |
| Also called | - | WB5500 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2013-07-19 | 2010-05-03 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.0 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.40 m | 5.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) | 426 gr (0.94 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 116 x 83 x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 images | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $250 |