Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh CX2
65 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27217/27217068f8c9495080b1e05c8e540f967ef1c3d8" alt="Pentax X-5 front Pentax X-5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/103c7/103c75a67dcbfed70caf5bb728c64082ed228093" alt="Ricoh CX2 front Ricoh CX2 front"
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 22-580mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 595g - 119 x 86 x 107mm
- Announced August 2012
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced August 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
In this article, we will be reviewing the Pentax X-5 versus Ricoh CX2, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Pentax and Ricoh. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the X-5 (16MP) and CX2 (9MP) but they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The X-5 was launched 3 years after the CX2 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Pentax X-5 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the X-5 scores versus the CX2 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Pentax X-5 & Ricoh CX2. The complete galleries are available at Pentax X-5 Gallery & Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax X-5 over the Ricoh CX2
X-5 | CX2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2012 | ![]() | August 2009 | More modern by 37 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Pentax X-5
CX2 | X-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax X-5 and Ricoh CX2
X-5 | CX2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | No Touch screen |
Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera, you need to consider its weight and volume. The Pentax X-5 features physical measurements of 119mm x 86mm x 107mm (4.7" x 3.4" x 4.2") with a weight of 595 grams (1.31 lbs) and the Ricoh CX2 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Check the Pentax X-5 versus Ricoh CX2 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the X-5 vs the CX2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c0d3/7c0d32558429fbca5ad69df2f8086a5b596eb45b" alt="Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh CX2 size comparison Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh CX2 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the X-5 and CX2 is 65 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a5ed/8a5ed5c8afdf627652007c19d2c11cc9ff22ff9a" alt="Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh CX2 top view buttons comparison Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh CX2 top view buttons comparison"
Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes simply by viewing specifications. The image underneath should offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the X-5 and CX2.
Plainly, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can expect the Pentax X-5 to render more detail utilizing its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The fresher X-5 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d82a/6d82a1e3a823b6e5d2e546b7858624a683ea2c01" alt="Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh CX2 sensor size comparison Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh CX2 sensor size comparison"
Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48aa5/48aa5405c20078454d7a826d228508fa17261244" alt="Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Pentax X-5 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
Pentax X-5 | Ricoh CX2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Pentax | Ricoh |
Model | Pentax X-5 | Ricoh CX2 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2012-08-22 | 2009-08-20 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 9MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 22-580mm (26.4x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 230k dot | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 595 grams (1.31 lb) | 185 grams (0.41 lb) |
Dimensions | 119 x 86 x 107mm (4.7" x 3.4" x 4.2") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | 4 x AA | DB-70 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $230 | $341 |