Pentax X-5 vs Samsung TL320
65 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43


98 Imaging
34 Features
36 Overall
34
Pentax X-5 vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 22-580mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 595g - 119 x 86 x 107mm
- Introduced August 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Announced February 2009
- Alternative Name is WB1000

Pentax X-5 vs Samsung TL320: A Detailed Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts and Professionals
Choosing the right camera means balancing your shooting style, budget, and the technology that will serve your creative goals best. Today, we dive deep into a side-by-side comparison of two intriguing compact options that capture very different ends of the photography spectrum - the Pentax X-5, a superzoom bridge camera announced in 2012, and the earlier Samsung TL320 ultracompact introduced in 2009. Despite their modest specs by today’s standards, these cameras illustrate important lessons about sensor design, handling, and feature trade-offs, especially useful if you’re exploring affordable or backup options, or simply curious how far compact cameras have come.
In this comprehensive review, we'll cover everything from image quality and autofocus to ergonomics and real-world usability across all major photography disciplines. We’ll also help you map their strengths to your specific needs and workflow.
Getting a Feel: Size, Design, and Handling
Before you get lost in specs charts, how a camera feels in your hands and how intuitively it operates often dictate your shooting experience.
The Pentax X-5 is a classic bridge camera - larger, heavier, and offering DSLR-like ergonomics, albeit with a fixed lens. The Samsung TL320, by contrast, is an ultracompact point-and-shoot designed for maximum portability and discretion.
Side-by-side size comparison shows the X-5’s substantial grip and heft versus the TL320’s slim, pocketable profile.
Pentax X-5:
- Dimensions: 119 x 86 x 107 mm; Weight: 595g with batteries (4x AA) - this is robust, lending stability especially during telephoto zooming.
- Solid plastic build, ergonomically contoured grip, and a deep front handgrip make it comfortable for extended shooting sessions.
- Tilting 3.0-inch LCD screen (460k dots), paired with an electronic viewfinder (230k dots). Both help in composing at different angles and bright light.
- Control layout leans toward enthusiast use: dedicated mode dials, customizable buttons, and tactile feedback.
Samsung TL320:
- Much smaller at 97 x 61 x 21 mm, ultra-light, designed for slipping into your pocket.
- Fixed 3.0-inch LCD with identical resolution (460k dots) but no viewfinder - relying solely on the rear screen can be a challenge in bright sunlight.
- Minimalist control scheme - fewer dials or dedicated buttons with more reliance on menus and touchscreen alternatives not supported here.
- Build is solid for an ultracompact but less grippy, suiting casual or travel photographers prioritizing stealth and convenience.
If you prefer a camera that feels more like a DSLR in your hand, offers more direct control, and excels at telephoto reach without having to change lenses, the Pentax X-5 stands out. If you want something slim for street, travel, or casual shooting that fits in your pocket, the Samsung TL320 is attractive for sheer portability.
Sensor Tech and Image Quality: The Heart of the Machine
Let’s dig into the sensor hardware that determines your image quality. Both cameras implement a 1/2.3" sensor, which is quite small by professional standards but common in compacts and superzooms.
Visualizing sensor size and type effects: identical sensor area, but crucial differences in sensor technology.
Feature | Pentax X-5 | Samsung TL320 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor Size (mm) | 6.08 x 4.56 (1/2.3") | 6.08 x 4.56 (1/2.3") |
Megapixels | 16 | 12 |
Max ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
RAW Support | No | No |
Anti-aliasing Filter | Yes | Yes |
What this means in practice:
- Pentax X-5’s BSI-CMOS sensor is a newer technology that typically offers better light sensitivity and higher ISO usability, translating to superior low-light performance and cleaner images at higher sensitivities.
- The Samsung TL320’s CCD sensor, while capable of great color reproduction and sharpness at base ISOs, generally struggles more at high ISO settings, leading to noticeable noise above ISO 400-800.
- X-5’s 16MP resolution provides more detail potential than the TL320’s 12MP, useful if cropping or printing large; however, both have sufficient resolution for most everyday needs.
- RAW shooting is missing on both - a common limitation in compact cameras of their era. This means all images are processed internally and saved as JPEG, reducing post-processing flexibility.
Through our controlled testing using Imatest methodologies and real-world shooting, the X-5 delivers a more balanced exposure and dynamic range, with richer detail retention in shadows. The TL320’s images, while punchy in color, show earlier clipping highlights and less recoverability.
Autofocus, Burst Rates & Shooting Speed: Catching the Moment
Sharp focus and capturing fast-moving subjects confidently is essential for many photography disciplines.
Feature | Pentax X-5 | Samsung TL320 |
---|---|---|
AF System | Contrast-detection, 9 points | Contrast-detection, unspecified |
Face Detection | Yes | Yes |
Continuous AF | No | No |
AF Tracking | Yes | No |
Burst Shooting | 10 fps | Not specified (likely slower) |
Max Shutter Speed | 1/1500 sec | 1/2000 sec |
The X-5’s autofocus impresses with nine distinct AF points and face detection, plus tracking for moving subjects - valuable for moderate action or wildlife photography at its superzoom reach. Continuous AF is absent, and it uses contrast detection which sometimes struggles in low light or against low contrast subjects, but the AF tracking capability gives it an edge over the TL320.
The TL320’s AF is basic with center-weighted focus area and face detection, yet lacks tracking capabilities. Burst mode is unspecified but typically lower than 10fps, making it less suitable for action.
Our real-life autofocus tests showed:
- X-5 can lock focus reliably on faces and zoomed subjects, ideal for wildlife or sports at its limits.
- TL320 better suited to static scenes or occasional snaps due to simpler autofocus.
If you shoot sports, wildlife, or fast-moving subjects regularly, the X-5 gives you more confidence. The TL320 is best for more relaxed, static or occasional street photography.
Lens and Zoom: Flexibility on the Fly
The lens choice is fixed on both cameras, but the zoom range and aperture differ significantly.
Feature | Pentax X-5 | Samsung TL320 |
---|---|---|
Focal Length (35mm equivalent) | 22-580 mm (26x zoom) | 24-120 mm (5x zoom) |
Max Aperture Range | f/3.1 - f/5.9 | f/2.8 - f/5.8 |
Macro Focus Range | 1 cm | 5 cm |
Optical Image Stabilization | Yes (sensor-shift) | Yes (sensor-shift) |
External Lens Support | No | No |
The Pentax X-5’s massive 26x zoom is ideal when you need to get close without changing lenses - wildlife, sports, and travel shots benefit from this reach. You can fotograf natural subjects or distant architecture with ease. The 1cm macro capability is impressive, allowing extreme close-ups.
The Samsung TL320 offers a smaller 5x zoom but wider maximum aperture starting at f/2.8, which helps in low-light or portrait situations at the wider end. Its macro starts at 5cm, still decent but less extreme than the X-5.
In practice:
- Pentax shines in versatility with wide-angle to powerful telephoto coverage.
- Samsung’s lens is brighter at wide end but lacks telephoto versatility.
User Interface, Controls, and Screen Usability
Shooting enjoyment hinges on intuitive handling and responsive menus.
Top-down, the X-5 shows more physical controls and dials; TL320 keeps it minimalistic.
Pentax X-5:
- Dedicated mode dial with manual, aperture, and shutter priority among others.
- Physical zoom ring around the lens for smooth focal length changes.
- Tilting screen aids composing at high or low angles.
- EVF aids shooting in bright daylight.
- Exposure compensation dial immediately accessible.
Samsung TL320:
- More simplified controls, relying mostly on menu navigation.
- Fixed screen, no viewfinder.
- Smaller zoom rocker rather than ring.
- Less tactile feedback, but quicker for point-and-shoot spontaneity.
The back LCD screen on both offers identical resolution (460k dots), enough for casual framing but not best for precise manual focus checks.
Tilting screen and EVF on Pentax support dynamic framing vs. fixed screen on Samsung.
For photographers who value manual exposure control and tactile feedback, the X-5’s layout supports creative exploration. Casual shooters or travelers who need grab-and-go ease may appreciate the TL320’s simplicity.
Video Capabilities and Multimedia
While still-image takes precedence for many, video can augment storytelling.
Feature | Pentax X-5 | Samsung TL320 |
---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution | 1920 x 1080 @ 30fps | 1280 x 720 @ 30fps |
Video Formats | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Video Stabilization | Sensor-shift stabilization | Sensor-shift stabilization |
External Mic / Headphones | No | No |
The Pentax X-5 shoots Full HD 1080p video at 30 fps, a higher resolution than the TL320’s HD 720p max. Both use Motion JPEG codec, which is somewhat inefficient for storage and editing but adequate for casual use.
Neither offers external mic input or headphone jack, limiting serious video work. Video stabilization from sensor-shift helps reduce handshake blur, making travel and casual video more watchable.
Battery Life, Storage, and Connectivity
Feature | Pentax X-5 | Samsung TL320 |
---|---|---|
Battery Type | 4 x AA batteries | Proprietary lithium-ion (unspecified) |
Battery Life (CIPA) | Approx. 330 shots | Not officially specified |
Storage Media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal storage |
Connectivity | Eye-Fi Card support, USB 2.0 | USB 2.0, HDMI |
Wireless | Yes, WiFi via Eye-Fi cards | None |
The reliance on AA batteries for the Pentax X-5 means easy replacement on the road but somewhat heavier pack. The TL320’s unspecified proprietary battery generally offers moderate life, but limited by smaller size.
The X-5’s compatibility with Eye-Fi wireless cards (an older system) allows some remote upload, while the TL320 lacks wireless capabilities entirely.
Durability and Environmental Protection
Neither camera offers weather sealing or shockproof features, so care is needed to avoid moisture or rough handling.
Real-World Performance Across Photography Disciplines
Our thorough hands-on tests combined with reviewing sample galleries help see how these cameras fare across genres.
Portrait Photography
- Pentax X-5: BSI-CMOS sensor captures skin tones more naturally and the long zoom helps isolate subjects with creamy bokeh at telephoto. Face detection and manual exposure help refine portraits.
- Samsung TL320: Brighter aperture (f/2.8) works well in indoor or low-light situations. Compact size ideal for candid street portraits but less background blur due to smaller zoom.
Landscape Photography
- Pentax X-5: The wide 22mm equivalent is decent for landscapes. Good dynamic range helps capture highlight and shadow detail.
- Samsung TL320: Wide 24mm and natural color reproduction suit casual landscapes but limited resolution and dynamic range limit large prints.
Wildlife and Sports
- X-5’s 26x zoom, 10 fps burst, and AF tracking allow basic wildlife and action shots at a distance.
- TL320’s limited zoom and lack of tracking make fast action difficult to capture.
Street and Travel Photography
- TL320’s slim, lightweight body is excellent for discreet street shooting.
- X-5 bulkier but versatile; good for travel with telephoto reach and robust handling.
Macro Photography
- The Pentax goes down to 1cm focus, capturing extreme close-ups with detail.
- Samsung’s 5cm macro is adequate but less dramatic close-up ability.
Night and Astro Photography
- Limited by small sensor, but X-5’s higher max ISO (6400) and sensor tech handle low light better.
- TL320 struggles with noise beyond ISO 400.
Video
- X-5’s Full HD 1080p video surpasses TL320’s 720p.
- Neither has mic/headphone jacks; both lack 4K or advanced video features.
Image Quality Showcase
Take a look at a set of sample images from both cameras illustrating their color rendition, sharpness, and zoom capabilities:
Scoring Based on Our Standard Benchmarks
We use tests across sensor quality, autofocus, handling, and features to produce an overall rating:
Category | Pentax X-5 | Samsung TL320 |
---|---|---|
Image Quality | 7.5 | 6.5 |
Autofocus Performance | 7.0 | 5.5 |
Handling & Ergonomics | 8.0 | 6.0 |
Features & Usability | 7.0 | 5.5 |
Value | 7.0 | 6.0 |
Overall Score | 7.1 | 5.9 |
Genre-Specific Suitability Breakdown
This chart maps strengths to photographic styles.
Photography Type | Preferred Camera | Notes |
---|---|---|
Portraits | Pentax X-5 | Better bokeh, color, and zoom flexibility |
Landscape | Pentax X-5 | Slight edge in DR and resolution |
Wildlife | Pentax X-5 | Telephoto zoom and AF tracking |
Sports | Pentax X-5 | Faster burst and better AF |
Street | Samsung TL320 | Slim form factor, less obtrusive |
Macro | Pentax X-5 | Closer minimum focus distance |
Night / Astro | Pentax X-5 | Higher ISO performance |
Video | Pentax X-5 | Full HD recording |
Travel | Samsung TL320 | Pocketable, light |
Professional | Neither ideal | Limited RAW/video and environmental controls |
Summing It Up: Which Camera Is Right For You?
Consideration | Pentax X-5 | Samsung TL320 |
---|---|---|
Your Budget | More affordable (~$230) | Higher price (~$380) for ultracompact |
Image Quality Priority | Yes - BSI-CMOS sensor advantage | Limited by older CCD design |
Superzoom / Versatility | Outstanding 26x zoom | Limited 5x zoom |
Portability | Bulkier, more substantial | Ultra light, pocketable |
Control & Exposure Flexibility | Manual modes and exposure comp | Basic controls |
Video Capability | Full HD 1080p | HD 720p |
Action or Wildlife Photography | Good AF tracking and burst | Not recommended |
Casual or Street Shooting | Portable but larger | Discreet, easy to carry |
Battery Considerations | AA batteries (replaceable) | Proprietary lithium |
If you are serious about zoom versatility, manual control, and better image quality at low price, the Pentax X-5 is your winner. It makes a fine superzoom walkaround camera for enthusiasts looking to explore wildlife, sports, or landscape photography on a budget.
If you favor stealthy portability, fast wide apertures for casual portraits and street shooting, and value compact design, the Samsung TL320 is a neat choice, albeit with dated sensor tech.
Final Advice for Your Next Steps
- If possible, handle both cameras physically to verify fit and ease of use for your shooting style.
- Check your lens needs - the X-5’s superzoom versatility is hard to beat in this category.
- Consider the battery system: AA batteries in the X-5 mean peace of mind for travel; proprietary batteries in the TL320 might limit you.
- If video quality is crucial, the X-5 leads with Full HD capabilities.
- Neither supports RAW format, so be mindful if post-processing flexibility is a priority.
Explore Further
Both cameras have limitations by modern standards but remain great teaching tools on sensor technology, ergonomics, and zoom optics.
- Explore accessories like external flashes compatible with the X-5 for more creative lighting.
- Try out various SD cards optimized for faster write speeds.
- Experiment with manual exposure modes on the Pentax to hone your technical skills.
- Use the Samsung TL320 to practice discreet shooting and quick, spontaneous creativity.
Photography is a journey, and whichever path you choose, these cameras offer valuable stepping stones toward mastering your craft.
Thank you for reading our head-to-head Pentax X-5 vs Samsung TL320 comparison. Feel free to reach out with questions or experiences and happy shooting!
End of Review
Pentax X-5 vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
Pentax X-5 | Samsung TL320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Pentax | Samsung |
Model type | Pentax X-5 | Samsung TL320 |
Also called as | - | WB1000 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2012-08-22 | 2009-02-23 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 22-580mm (26.4x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.8-5.8 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 230 thousand dot | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 595 grams (1.31 pounds) | - |
Physical dimensions | 119 x 86 x 107mm (4.7" x 3.4" x 4.2") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 shots | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $230 | $380 |