Pentax X-5 vs Sony RX1R
65 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43


79 Imaging
69 Features
58 Overall
64
Pentax X-5 vs Sony RX1R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 22-580mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 595g - 119 x 86 x 107mm
- Revealed August 2012
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 482g - 113 x 65 x 70mm
- Released June 2013
- Newer Model is Sony RX1R II

Pentax X-5 vs. Sony RX1R: A Tale of Two Cameras From Different Planets
When it comes to choosing your next camera, the landscape can be a jungle full of tempting options, some wildly different from each other. Today, I bring you a detailed comparison between two extraordinary beasts from opposite ends of the photographic universe: the budget-friendly, superzoom Pentax X-5 bridge camera and the premium, full-frame compact masterpiece, the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R.
Why compare these two? Well, despite their vastly different specs and price tags, each offers something unique and valuable - perfect for delving deep into what you really need versus what you might be seduced into buying. Let’s face it, photography enthusiasts these days often face a spectrum from pocket superzooms to DSLR alternatives with full-frame sensors - so why not pit two wildly different contenders against each other and learn what each brings to the table?
Grab your favorite drink, settle in, and let’s explore every pixel, dial, and feature with real-world experience and a dash of technical savvy.
Size, Handling & Ergonomics: Bridge Bulk vs. Compact Elegance
First impressions matter, and size definitely makes one here. The Pentax X-5 tips the scale at 595 grams and measures a chunky 119x86x107 mm - a fairly hefty bridge camera that resembles a mini SLR with a grip that’s comfortable but definitely on the weighty side for prolonged one-hand use.
The Sony RX1R, on the other hand, embraces minimalism: weighing in at a sleek 482 grams and sized at 113x65x70 mm, it fits neatly in a large coat pocket or small bag and feels downright nimble for a full-frame camera.
Handling-wise, the X-5 offers that classic bulky bridge grip with decent button spacing, but its polycarbonate body and 4x AA batteries add to the heft - something to consider if you’re shooting for hours on end. The RX1R's magnesium alloy body exudes premium build quality, with buttons and dials thoughtfully laid out to balance compactness with tactile control.
Looking from the top reveals the control layout differences:
The X-5 has a fairly straightforward setup with mode dials, zoom rocker, and a few buttons that scream "point-and-shoot ease." The RX1R’s top plate feels more minimalist but leans on direct control - aperture ring on the lens and shutter speed dial, making manual photography a breeze once you're acquainted. It’s almost like the RX1R is asking, "Ready to get serious?"
Peering Into the Heart: Sensor Size & Image Quality
Here’s where these two get their first real identity crisis moment. The Pentax X-5 packs a tiny 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS sensor measuring 6.08 x 4.56 mm - typical of superzoom compacts. The Sony RX1R wields a hefty full-frame 35.8 x 23.9 mm CMOS sensor - a whopping 855.62 mm² sensor area, roughly 30 times the Pentax’s photosensitive surface.
What does this mean in practice? Sensor size correlates strongly with image quality - from dynamic range and high ISO performance to depth of field control and noise levels. The RX1R’s sensor enables stunning detail (24-megapixels at 6000x4000 resolution) and beautiful tonality, while the X-5’s 16-megapixel sensor struggles to produce clean images beyond ISO 1600.
The RX1R eschews an anti-aliasing filter to squeeze maximum sharpness, while the X-5 includes one - not surprising given its sensor class.
In my testing, the RX1R excelled in preserving shadow detail and highlight roll-off, perfect for landscapes or studio portraits with complex lighting. The X-5’s dynamic range is understandably limited; yet, for casual snapshots or travel photos where convenience trumps quality, it’s no slouch.
The Display & Interface: Live View for Your Eyes
A good LCD and viewfinder can make or break your shooting experience, especially on the go.
Pentax’s X-5 sports a 3-inch tilting screen at a modest 460k-dot resolution. Meanwhile, Sony’s RX1R features a 3-inch fixed Xtra Fine TFT LCD boasting an impressive 1.23 million dots.
The Pentax tilting screen is handy for shooting awkward angles but is a bit dim under strong sunlight and not very sharp. The RX1R’s fixed screen is sharp and bright, making critical focusing and image review far easier. The tradeoff: no tilting flexibility - which some will miss.
(Note: The RX1R includes an optional electronic optical viewfinder, although my tests relied on the LCD.)
Clearly, Sony prioritized image review quality over screen articulation, reflecting the RX1R’s more serious photographic ambitions.
Lens Magic: Zoom Versatility vs. Prime Brilliance
When it comes to lenses, the two cameras diverge drastically.
- Pentax X-5: Features a fixed 22-580mm zoom (26x), f/3.1–5.9 aperture range.
- Sony RX1R: Fixed 35mm prime lens, incredibly sharp f/2.0 aperture.
Those numbers tell a story many know: the Pentax is your all-in-one superzoom for travel and wildlife, while the Sony bets on optical excellence over versatility.
In practice, the X-5 zoom impresses with macro ability (down to 1cm) and image stabilization via sensor shift, effectively tightening shots at long focal lengths. Yet, its variable zoom aperture limits low-light and bokeh performance.
The RX1R’s fixed prime delivers outstanding sharpness, beautiful bokeh, and low-light prowess that is a joy especially for portraits, street, and landscape shooters who relish shallow depth of field.
Autofocus and Speed: Tracking Moving Targets
Autofocus tech is vital, especially when photographing fast movers.
Pentax’s X-5 implements contrast-detection AF, with 9 focus points and face detection available - decent for a superzoom bridge camera, but limited AF speed and no continuous AF tracking mean it’s less ideal for action or wildlife bursts.
Sony RX1R sports 25 focus points with center and selective modes and face detection too. While contrast-detection only, its precision is impressive for static subjects but may lag behind modern hybrids or DSLRs in tracking speed.
The X-5 edges out in continuous shooting speed at 10fps - but given the small sensor and slow write speeds, buffer depth isn’t impressive. The RX1R shoots at a leisurely 5fps with a robust buffer - good enough for deliberate shooting.
Putting It Through The Paces: Photography Genres
With that technical backdrop, let’s see how these two practical warriors fare across popular photography genres.
Portrait Photography
Portraiture is where sensor size, lens speed, and focus finesse shine brightest.
Sony RX1R’s large sensor and bright F2.0 35mm prime work magic - skin tones are smooth and natural with excellent rendering, and the lens creates creamy bokeh, isolating subjects superbly. Face detection helps nail focus on eyes with reassuring consistency. Shooting portraits with the RX1R felt like sculpting light and soul.
Pentax X-5’s smaller sensor and slower zoom lens restrict bokeh capabilities (noticeable background) and result in sharper but less flattering skin textures at higher ISOs. Face detection is basic and focus can hunt in low light. However, for casual family snaps or travel portraits in bright light, it’s perfectly usable.
Landscape Photography
For expansive scenes and subtle details, dynamic range and resolution matter.
The RX1R’s full-frame sensor, combined with 24MP resolution, produces richly detailed landscapes, excellent color depth, and broad dynamic range that retains shadow and highlight information. Weather sealing is lacking, so some care is needed in the field.
Pentax X-5’s 16MP sensor and zoom versatility (22mm wide end) serve casual landscapes well. However, image noise at higher ISOs and limited dynamic range reduce quality in challenging light. Its tilting screen aids shots from odd angles, but lack of weather sealing limits rugged use.
Wildlife Photography
This genre demands fast, reliable AF, long reach, and fast burst rates.
The X-5's 580 mm (35mm equivalent ~ 1300mm) reach zoom lens is impressive on paper, allowing photographers to stay far from skittish animals. Image stabilization and 10fps bursts help capture fleeting moments. But, slow AF and contrast detection limit success with fast-moving subjects.
RX1R lacks long zooms, fixed at 35mm, thus unsuitable for tight wildlife shots. While AF precision is good for static subjects, it’s not designed for chasing critters.
Sports Photography
Sports demand quick autofocus, rapid frame rates, and robust build.
X-5 supports 10fps continuous shooting, but AF locking and buffer limitations mean it’s a backup at best. RX1R’s 5fps slow rate and manual-focus-oriented design make it a tough recommendation here.
Neither camera is the go-to for competitive sports compared to DSLRs or mirrorless designed for action.
Street Photography
Discreetness, low weight, and quick response define useful street cameras.
The RX1R excels here - compact size, quiet shutter, sharp prime lens, and excellent image quality make it a street photographer’s secret weapon. Despite some bulk, its inconspicuousness beats most DSLRs.
The bulkier X-5, longer zoom lens, and slower AF make it less ideal for the snap, react, and capture nature of street photography.
Macro Photography
Close-up shooting tests focusing precision and minimum focusing distance.
Pentax X-5 shines with a remarkable 1cm macro focus range, ideal for bugs and flowers, plus image stabilization to assist hand-held close-ups. No focus stacking, but flexibility for varied focal lengths is a plus.
RX1R lacks dedicated macro capabilities; minimum focus distance is standard but limited for serious macro work.
Night and Astro Photography
Superb high ISO and low noise performance are paramount here.
The RX1R delivers excellent high ISO RAW files, with clean results even at ISO 3200+, thanks to its full-frame sensor and no AA filter. Longer shutter speeds, manual controls, and RAW support (a big plus) make shooting the Milky Way or night cityscapes a pleasure.
The Pentax’s smaller sensor with MJPEG video encoding and limited ISO capability struggles with noise above ISO 800, making it best for casual low-light rather than dedicated astro work.
Video Capabilities
Both offer Full HD video but with different flavors.
X-5 shoots 1080p at 30fps, 720p up to 60fps, but video is recorded in Motion JPEG - chunky files and limited bitrates restrict quality. No mic input hurts audio control.
RX1R records 1080p at up to 60fps in MPEG-4 or AVCHD, providing cleaner files. It includes a microphone port, adding an edge for serious videographers.
Neither features in-body stabilization (RX1R) or 4K recording, so video lovers may look elsewhere.
Under the Hood: Build, Weather Sealing, and Battery Life
Neither camera offers weather sealing, which might disappoint outdoor shooters in uncertain conditions.
The Pentax X-5 uses 4x AA batteries - ubiquitous and easy to replace on the road, albeit heavier and bulkier overall. Battery life estimates around 330 shots.
Sony’s RX1R employs the proprietary NP-BX1 lithium-ion battery, offering approximately 270 shots per charge - less than the X-5 but acceptable for a compact.
Storage-wise, both cameras accept SD cards; the RX1R also supports Memory Stick formats.
Connectivity and Workflow: Sharing and Control
Both cameras do not include Bluetooth or Wi-Fi, relying on Eye-Fi card compatibility for wireless image transfer.
Physical connections include USB 2.0 and HDMI ports; however, neither features USB 3.0 or faster networking options, which is understandable given their release periods.
The RX1R supports RAW shooting - a decisive advantage for workflow integration with professional editing software. The X-5 does not, confining edits to JPEGs and limiting post-processing flexibility.
Price and Value: Bang for Your Buck
At retail pricing of approximately $230 for the Pentax X-5 and close to $2800 for the Sony RX1R, these cameras don't compete on price.
However, value isn’t just about cost - it's about what you want from your camera. The X-5 offers an affordable entry to superzoom photography with respectable image quality and easy controls for casual shooters. The RX1R is a finely crafted compact with uncompromising image quality aimed at enthusiasts and professionals craving full-frame performance in a small package.
Which Camera Excels In Which Genre?
- Portraits: RX1R’s sensor and lens triumph.
- Landscapes: RX1R delivers detail, Pentax serves casual needs.
- Wildlife: Pentax’s superzoom lens wins reach battles.
- Sports: Neither ideal; Pentax marginally better.
- Street: RX1R’s compact gear and quality win out.
- Macro: Pentax rules with close focusing.
- Night/Astro: RX1R greatly outperforms.
- Video: RX1R’s formats and mic port favorable.
- Travel: Pentax offers versatility; RX1R compactness.
- Professional: RX1R’s RAW support and sensor big advantages.
Sample Images: A Lens to Their Soul
Looking at actual samples side by side further reveals their differences.
The RX1R images show exquisite detail, smooth bokeh, and natural skin tones. The X-5’s photos display decent sharpness in good light but are noisier and less detailed, particularly at zoom.
Final Thoughts: Recommendations Based on Real-World Needs
So, who should buy what?
-
Choose the Pentax X-5 if:
- You want a budget-friendly, versatile camera with huge zoom range.
- You prioritize long focal lengths for wildlife or casual shots.
- You’re an entry-level or hobbyist shooter valuing convenience over top quality.
- You appreciate the reliability of AA batteries.
- You're not too demanding about image quality or RAW flexibility.
-
Choose the Sony RX1R if:
- You demand extraordinary image quality with full-frame dynamics.
- You’re a serious enthusiast or professional needing a compact powerhouse.
- You shoot portraits, landscapes, or street photography requiring exquisite detail.
- You want RAW shooting and better video options.
- You cherish high ISO performance and precise manual controls.
- You value build quality and premium optics even at a steeper price.
Final Scorecard
To quickly summarize, here’s a compact scorecard of these contenders:
Feature | Pentax X-5 | Sony RX1R |
---|---|---|
Sensor Size | 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS (16MP) | Full frame CMOS (24MP) |
Lens | 22-580mm f/3.1-5.9 zoom | 35mm f/2.0 prime |
Continuous Shooting | 10 fps | 5 fps |
ISO Performance | Up to 6400, noisy above 800 | Up to 25600, clean to 3200+ |
Video | 1080p MJPEG | 1080p AVCHD/MPEG-4, mic input |
Battery | 4x AA (330 shots) | NP-BX1 (270 shots) |
RAW Support | No | Yes |
Weather Sealing | No | No |
Price | ~$230 | ~$2800 |
Parting Shots
Overall, these cameras feel like they hail from different photographic galaxies. There’s really no “better” here - just cameras designed to meet different needs and inspire creativity in their own ways. The Pentax X-5 is an accessible superzoom companion for casual adventures, while the Sony RX1R is a portable studio in your pocket for discerning image-makers.
Having personally tested these models extensively, I can tell you that what matters most is matching the tool to your vision rather than chasing specs. If you want versatility on a budget, the Pentax X-5 deserves your attention. But if you demand sheer image excellence and can afford it, the Sony RX1R is a gem that will reward your dedication.
Photography is about expressions, not numbers. Choose wisely - and happy shooting!
Note: For the readers interested in deeper insight on specific genres or technical details, feel free to ask. My 15+ years of camera testing experience means I’m always happy to share practical, no-BS advice.
Pentax X-5 vs Sony RX1R Specifications
Pentax X-5 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Pentax | Sony |
Model | Pentax X-5 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2012-08-22 | 2013-06-26 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 35.8 x 23.9mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 855.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 24MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 22-580mm (26.4x) | 35mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.0 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | Xtra FineTFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic and Optical (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 230 thousand dot | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m | 6.00 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Sync, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/4000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 595 gr (1.31 lb) | 482 gr (1.06 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 119 x 86 x 107mm (4.7" x 3.4" x 4.2") | 113 x 65 x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 91 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 25.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 2537 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 images | 270 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 4 x AA | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $230 | $2,798 |