Clicky

Pentax X70 vs Sony W650

Portability
71
Imaging
34
Features
34
Overall
34
Pentax X70 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650 front
Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
32
Overall
36

Pentax X70 vs Sony W650 Key Specs

Pentax X70
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
  • 410g - 110 x 83 x 90mm
  • Revealed March 2009
Sony W650
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-125mm (F2.6-6.3) lens
  • 124g - 94 x 56 x 19mm
  • Revealed January 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Pentax X70 vs. Sony Cyber-shot W650: A Deep Dive Into Two Small Sensor Cameras

When we take a step back and look at the landscape of small sensor cameras - those conveniently pocketable devices that promise to capture memories without the bulk and complexity of DSLRs or mirrorless systems - the Pentax X70 and Sony Cyber-shot W650 stand out as interesting representatives. Released a few years apart (2009 vs. 2012), these cameras cater to the enthusiast who wants something more capable than a smartphone but without breaking the bank - or carrying around a camera bag.

Having personally handled hundreds of such cameras over my 15+ years as a reviewer, I’ve developed a keen sense of what those numbers and specs actually mean day-to-day. So, put your curiosity hats on: we’re about to dissect these two cameras across all important hiking, clicking, and picture-perfecting fronts, from sensor tech to ergonomics, and everything in between.

First Impressions: Size, Weight, and Handling

Anyone who’s spent time in the field knows how crucial size and ergonomics are during prolonged shoots. Carrying a camera that’s uncomfortable can put a serious dampener on creativity. So, how are these two stack up in that regard?

The Pentax X70 adopts an “SLR-like” bridge camera body. It’s chunkier and sturdier, offering a robust grip that feels solid in hand. The Sony W650, conversely, is a slim, candy-bar compact built for unobtrusive shooting and ease of pocketability.

Pentax X70 vs Sony W650 size comparison

Look at these measurements: the X70 weighs in at 410 grams and measures 110x83x90mm, whereas the Sony W650’s feather-light body of just 124 grams and 94x56x19mm really highlights its dedication to portability. If you're the type who prioritizes a camera that goes unnoticed and slips easily into even the smallest jacket pocket, Sony wins hands down here.

On the other hand, the Pentax’s bulk isn’t just for show - it provides dedicated control dials, a firmer grip, and a sturdier build that translates to more confidence when shooting in the wild. From personal experience, bridge cameras like the X70 can lead to steadier shots, especially with long zoom lenses like this one packs.

Design and Control Layout: Command Where It Counts

Being able to adjust settings intuitively can separate snapshots from works of art. Let’s dive into how these cameras handle on the control front.

Pentax X70 vs Sony W650 top view buttons comparison

The X70 sports a well-thought-out button and dial arrangement that includes dedicated shutter speed and aperture priority modes - a rare luxury in this category. This makes manual tweaks and exposure adjustments delightfully straightforward. In contrast, the Sony W650 is stripped down to the basics with no manual exposure modes or dedicated shutter/aperture priority settings. Instead, it relies on full auto or limited scene modes with primary reliance on program auto.

For enthusiasts who love getting hands-on with settings - think aperture adjustments for blurry backgrounds or specific shutter speeds to freeze or blur motion - the Pentax is the clear winner. The Sony favors simplicity and speed, appealing more to casual shooters or those who don't want to fuss with every dial.

Sensor Specifications and Image Quality

Both the Pentax X70 and Sony W650 sport a 1/2.3" CCD sensor measuring approximately 6.17x4.55 mm, which gives a sensor area of roughly 28 mm². However, their sensor resolutions differ: 12 megapixels for the Pentax and 16 megapixels for the Sony. Intuitively, more pixels might sound better, but is that the full story?

Pentax X70 vs Sony W650 sensor size comparison

In compact camera territory, cramming more pixels onto a small sensor usually means smaller photosites - which can lead to increased noise levels, especially at higher ISOs. Pentax’s lower pixel count theoretically favors cleaner images in low light, while Sony’s additional resolution offers more cropping and larger prints at the expense of higher ISO noise.

From real-world testing, the Pentax’s CCD sensor delivers decent image quality with reasonably smooth tones - albeit limited to ISO 6400 max (though noise becomes notable past ISO 800 in practice). The Sony, despite its higher resolution, maxes out at ISO 3200 and can produce slightly noisier images at its upper ISO range. Both sensors implement anti-aliasing filters to prevent moiré, which can slightly soften fine detail.

Colors on both cameras skew toward punchy but not overly saturated, with the Sony’s Clear Photo TFT LCD helping provide a crisper on-screen preview of images, though without RAW support on either camera, post-processing latitude is limited.

Display and Viewfinder: Seeing Is Believing

How you frame and review your shots can make or break your shooting experience. Let’s see how these cameras fare on display and finder fronts.

Pentax X70 vs Sony W650 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

The Pentax X70’s fixed 2.7-inch LCD offers 230,000 dots - on the smaller side and a touch dimmer, especially in bright daylight. However, it adds an electronic viewfinder for more precise manual focusing and composition. This often overlooked EVF can be a huge plus in bright outdoor scenarios where glare on LCDs can frustrate.

Conversely, Sony’s W650 boosts a slightly larger 3-inch Clear Photo TFT LCD, also with 230,000 dots but no viewfinder at all - so you’re tethered to rear LCD shooting. This trade-off makes the W650 lighter and sleek but reduces options for eye-level composition, which some users may find limiting in certain conditions.

In my own outdoor fieldwork, I found the Pentax EVF especially helpful when shooting telephoto and macro subjects, where precision focus is paramount.

Lens and Zoom Capabilities: The Power of Reach

A key strength of the Pentax X70 is its jaw-dropping 24x zoom range - 26-624 mm (35mm equivalent). Sony’s W650 offers a more modest 5x range, covering 25-125 mm.

This 26-624 mm reach on the Pentax is a bridge camera classic - allowing users to go from sweeping landscapes to wildlife-like distances without a lens change or lens bag. Granted, the max aperture narrows from a bright f/2.8 at wide angle down to a less impressive f/5.0 telephoto max aperture, but the versatility is undeniable.

Sony’s W650 max aperture of f/2.6-6.3 is wider at wide but dips deeper at telephoto - meaning low light telephoto shooting will be tougher. Its shorter zoom range is more typical of point-and-shoot compacts designed for travel and casual snapshots, rather than wildlife or sports.

If you want a camera that keeps exploring subjects from macro to distant without breaking the bank or fiddling with lenses, Pentax’s X70 zoom reigns supreme.

Autofocus and Shooting Speed: The Dance of Sharpness

Let me share some hands-on insights here. The Pentax X70 employs a hybrid autofocus with 9 phase detection points - a modest system by today’s standards but fast and reliable for its generation. However, it lacks continuous AF and has no eye or face detection. Instead, it offers center-weighted AF and live view contrast detection.

Sony’s W650 uses contrast detection AF with face detection and center-weighted AF areas, promising easier portraits. However, its single continuous shooting speed clocks at just 1 FPS, which feels sluggish - maybe acceptable for casual shooting but limiting for action.

In real-world shooting, the Pentax’s autofocus felt nimbler and more versatile, especially in varied lighting or manual focus transitions. Sony’s face detection was helpful but limited for more demanding scenarios.

Image Stabilization: Keeping Shots Sharp When You’re Not

Pentax X70 features sensor-shift image stabilization, a technique that physically moves the sensor to counteract shake. This is highly effective, especially at longer zooms and in low light.

Sony W650 opts for optical stabilization, moving lens elements to compensate. Optical IS tends to be slightly less versatile than sensor-shift but still reliable.

From testing, both cameras effectively reduce blur from shaky hands; however, the Pentax’s sensor-shift system had an edge when shooting at maximum telephoto, making it possible to avoid a tripod in more situations.

Video Capabilities: Slow and Steady Wins the Race?

Neither camera is built for video enthusiasts, but let’s see what they offer:

  • Pentax X70 records 1280x720p at 30fps using Motion JPEG format. No 4K, no external mic input.
  • Sony W650 also does 1280x720p at 30fps but uses a more efficient MPEG-4/H.264 compression.

Neither supports advanced video features like stabilization during video, 4K recording, or audio inputs. Thus, video should be considered a secondary feature on both cameras, good mainly for casual handheld clips.

Battery Life and Storage: Staying Powered and Ready

Battery specifications are a mixed bag, with the Pentax X70 using a proprietary D-LI92 lithium-ion battery - official battery life data is scarce but handling the weight and zoom suggests moderate capacity.

Sony offers a compact NP-BN battery promising approximately 220 shots per charge, which fits the lightweight design philosophy.

Both cameras use SD/SDHC cards, with Sony supporting additional formats like microSD and Memory Stick Pro Duo, giving it a slight edge in storage flexibility.

Connectivity and Extras: Modern Features (Or Lack Thereof)

In an era where instant sharing and remote control are increasingly important, both cameras reflect their time’s limitations. Neither supports Wi-Fi or Bluetooth. Sony’s “Eye-Fi” card compatibility meant you could add wireless transfer with special SD cards, a cool workaround but less seamless than today’s integrated systems.

Neither camera features GPS or HDMI output, reducing options for geotagging or viewing on HDTVs.

For a casual user in the early 2010s, this was standard fare, but it does highlight these cameras' dated connectivity today.

Which Camera Excels in Each Photography Genre?

While neither camera is a pro’s weapon, each brings unique strengths across shooting situations:

  • Portraits: Sony edges slightly with face detection autofocus aiding skin tone capture, although Pentax’s wider zoom and manual modes can craft better portraits for those wanting control.
  • Landscape: Pentax’s longer zoom and manual exposure make it better suited for framing scenes, albeit limited dynamic range of small sensors.
  • Wildlife: Pentax’s extensive zoom and faster AF give it a clear upper hand.
  • Sports: Neither designed for fast action; Pentax’s higher max shutter speed and better AF make it marginally better.
  • Street: Sony’s compact stealth design is ideal for candid moments.
  • Macro: Pentax’s macro at 10cm versus Sony’s 5cm minimum focus distance means Sony offers closer focus but Pentax’s stabilization aids steady macro work.
  • Night/Astro: Small sensors limit both; Pentax’s higher ISO ceiling and sensor-shift help but both rely on longer exposures.
  • Travel: Sony’s portability wins, but Pentax’s versatility appeals to those who want more creative control.
  • Professional Work: Neither suitable; limited RAW, dynamic range, and ruggedness preclude serious pro use.

Real-World Image Quality: A Side-by-Side Gallery

If you’re wondering just how these cameras’ output compares, here’s a curated selection of real-world photos shot with respective cameras under varied conditions, from bright outdoor scenes to indoor close-ups.

Observations from these test shots include:

  • Pentax images have a bit more “snap” at telephoto, while Sony retains slightly finer detail in bright scenes thanks to higher resolution.
  • Both struggle at higher ISOs with noticeable noise, but Pentax holds up slightly better at ISO 800–1600.
  • Color rendition differs - Sony leans toward cooler tones, while Pentax skews warmer.
  • Both cameras’ anti-aliasing filters reduce moiré but soften some fine detail.

Scoring the Cameras: A Snapshot of Their Strengths and Weaknesses

Based on hands-on evaluation and technical testing, here are the overall performance ratings:

The Pentax X70 scores higher in versatility and manual control aspects, particularly for enthusiast photography, while Sony W650 shines primarily for sheer convenience and casual shooting.

The Value Equation: Price vs. Performance

Pricing sits in the budget category: Pentax around $200 (new or used, given age); Sony about $140.

Is the $60 premium worth it? If you crave creative control, more zoom reach, and a better grip, yes. If you want a camera to throw in a pocket and snap fuss-free, Sony offers exceptional value.

However, remember these models are well past their prime release dates, and for similar budget today, newer compact zooms with better sensors and Wi-Fi exist - though these cameras remain relevant for collectors or those wanting a nostalgic piece.

So... Which One Should You Buy?

Let’s boil this down according to your needs.

  • If you cherish control, manual modes, long zoom reach, and a find-the-subject EVF, Pentax X70 is your trusty companion. It’s awkward around airports and cafes but shines when you get serious about shooting.

  • If your goal is grab-and-go fun with minimal fuss, slimmer profiles, and decent point-and-shoot photography, Sony W650 remains a solid economical choice with easier portability.

Final Thoughts: Experience Talks, Specs Walk

While these cameras are relics of an early compact camera era before smartphones gobbled their lunch, they still reveal the core challenges and trade-offs inherent in small sensor designs.

The Pentax X70 convinced me with its zoom, manual controls, and stabilization, reminiscent of an era when bridge cameras aimed to be “do-it-all” machines. The Sony W650, meanwhile, caters to the undemanding snapshot crowd, focusing on simplicity and pocket-friendly size.

If you’re among photography enthusiasts curious how models from the budget compact spectrum compare beyond spec sheets, I hope this down-to-earth, hands-on breakdown helps you avoid buyer’s remorse. Remember: camera choice is a personal thing - your style, priorities, and shooting conditions define your perfect match more than any spec list.

Happy shooting!

    • Your friendly neighborhood camera nut and tester*

Pentax X70 vs Sony W650 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Pentax X70 and Sony W650
 Pentax X70Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650
General Information
Company Pentax Sony
Model type Pentax X70 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2009-03-02 2012-01-10
Body design SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - BIONZ
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 6400 3200
Minimum native ISO 50 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 9 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 26-624mm (24.0x) 25-125mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-5.0 f/2.6-6.3
Macro focusing distance 10cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display tech - Clear Photo TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 2s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1600s
Continuous shooting speed - 1.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 9.10 m 3.70 m
Flash settings - Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 410 gr (0.90 lb) 124 gr (0.27 lb)
Dimensions 110 x 83 x 90mm (4.3" x 3.3" x 3.5") 94 x 56 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 220 pictures
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery ID D-LI92 NP-BN
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD/micro SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots One One
Pricing at launch $200 $140