Clicky

Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung ST93

Portability
66
Imaging
40
Features
37
Overall
38
Pentax XG-1 front
 
Samsung ST93 front
Portability
97
Imaging
38
Features
20
Overall
30

Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung ST93 Key Specs

Pentax XG-1
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1248mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
  • 567g - 119 x 89 x 98mm
  • Launched July 2014
Samsung ST93
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • 110g - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Launched April 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung ST93 Overview

Following is a extensive analysis of the Pentax XG-1 versus Samsung ST93, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Pentax and Samsung. The image resolution of the XG-1 (16MP) and the ST93 (16MP) is very close and both cameras provide the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The XG-1 was revealed 3 years after the ST93 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Pentax XG-1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung ST93 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the XG-1 scores versus the ST93 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

        

Reasons to pick Pentax XG-1 over the Samsung ST93

 XG-1 ST93 
LaunchedJuly 2014April 2011More modern by 40 months
Focus manually Dial exact focus

Reasons to pick Samsung ST93 over the Pentax XG-1

 ST93 XG-1 

Common features in the Pentax XG-1 and Samsung ST93

 XG-1 ST93 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display measurement
Display resolution460k460kSame display resolution
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither has Touch friendly display

Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung ST93 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Pentax XG-1 has exterior dimensions of 119mm x 89mm x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") accompanied by a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) and the Samsung ST93 has dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs).

Check the Pentax XG-1 versus Samsung ST93 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the XG-1 and the ST93.

Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung ST93 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XG-1 and ST93 is 66 and 97 respectively.

Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung ST93 top view buttons comparison

Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung ST93 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be hard to picture the difference in sensor sizes simply by looking through specs. The picture here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the XG-1 and ST93.

All in all, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same MP therefore you can expect comparable quality of pictures although you will want to take the age of the cameras into account. The younger XG-1 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung ST93 sensor size comparison

Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung ST93 Screen and ViewFinder

Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung ST93 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Pentax XG-1
Portrait photography with Samsung ST93
40
focusing manually
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
external flash not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
29
good megapixels (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not available
no external flash support
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Pentax XG-1 Street photography factors
Samsung ST93 Street photography factors
43
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
heavier than competitors (567g)
49
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Pentax XG-1 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung ST93 as a Sports photography camera
45
incredible zoom range (24-1248mm 52.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
terrible battery power (240 shots)
lacks phase detect auto focus
27
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
can't change focal length (()mm)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Pentax XG-1
Travel photography with Samsung ST93
52
decent megapixels (16MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (24mm)
very long reach (1248mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
terrible battery power (240 shots)
heavier than competitors (567g)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
70
good megapixels (16MP)
flash built-in
very good maximum aperture (f)
lack of Time Lapse mode
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Pentax XG-1 Landscape photography features
Samsung ST93 Landscape photography features
45
focusing manually
rather wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
terrible battery power (240 shots)
lack of Time Lapse recording
38
very good maximum aperture (f)
screen size is good (3 inch)
good megapixels (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (()mm)
manual mode not available
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
lack of Time Lapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Pentax XG-1 Vlogging highlights
Samsung ST93 Vlogging highlights
25
rather wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
lack of external mic jack
heavier than competitors (567 grams)
27
very good maximum aperture (f)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external mic port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Pentax XG-1 vs Samsung ST93 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Pentax XG-1 and Samsung ST93
 Pentax XG-1Samsung ST93
General Information
Company Pentax Samsung
Model type Pentax XG-1 Samsung ST93
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Ultracompact
Launched 2014-07-15 2011-04-20
Body design SLR-like (bridge) Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-1248mm (52.0x) ()
Max aperture f/2.8-5.6 -
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 3"
Resolution of display 460k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 200k dot -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4s 8s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed 9.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 6.00 m -
Flash options Force Off, Flash Auto, Force Flash, Slow Sync., Slow Sync. + Red-Eye, Red-Eye Reduction -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 567 gr (1.25 lbs) 110 gr (0.24 lbs)
Physical dimensions 119 x 89 x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 240 shots -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID LB-060 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) -
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC -
Storage slots 1 1
Price at launch $599 -