Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh G900
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh G900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2018
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh G900 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Ricoh CX2 versus Ricoh G900, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof and they are both manufactured by Ricoh. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and G900 (20MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe CX2 was released 9 years earlier than the G900 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a simple view of how the CX2 scores versus the G900 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh G900 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh CX2 and Ricoh G900. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh CX2 Gallery and Ricoh G900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Ricoh G900
| CX2 | G900 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Ricoh CX2
| G900 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2018 |  | August 2009 | Newer by 103 months |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 920k | Crisper screen (+120k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Ricoh G900
| CX2 | G900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh G900 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh CX2 has got exterior measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) whilst the Ricoh G900 has dimensions of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh CX2 versus Ricoh G900 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the CX2 vs the G900.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the CX2 and G900 is 93 and 89 respectively.
Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh G900 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions only by seeing a spec sheet. The image below will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the CX2 and G900.
As you can see, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Ricoh G900 to show more detail as a result of its extra 11MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged CX2 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh G900 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Ricoh CX2 vs Ricoh G900 Specifications
| Ricoh CX2 | Ricoh G900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Ricoh |
| Model type | Ricoh CX2 | Ricoh G900 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-08-20 | 2018-02-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m (ISO 400) | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Flash on, flash off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840x2160 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 185 grams (0.41 lb) | 247 grams (0.54 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 photographs |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | DB-70 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $341 | $752 |