Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung NX200
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
90 Imaging
61 Features
57 Overall
59
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung NX200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed August 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 223g - 117 x 63 x 36mm
- Introduced February 2012
- Replaced the Samsung NX100
- Refreshed by Samsung NX210
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung NX200 Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Ricoh CX2 versus Samsung NX200, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and NX200 (20MP) and the CX2 (1/2.3") and NX200 (APS-C) have totally different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe CX2 was announced 3 years prior to the NX200 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the CX2 grades against the NX200 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung NX200 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh CX2 & Samsung NX200. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh CX2 Gallery & Samsung NX200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Samsung NX200
CX2 | NX200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 614k | Clearer screen (+306k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX200 over the Ricoh CX2
NX200 | CX2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2012 | August 2009 | Newer by 30 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Samsung NX200
CX2 | NX200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither offers Touch screen |
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung NX200 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh CX2 offers exterior measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) while the Samsung NX200 has measurements of 117mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") with a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh CX2 versus Samsung NX200 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the CX2 versus the NX200.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the CX2 and NX200 is 93 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung NX200 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions just by going through technical specs. The image here should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the CX2 and NX200.
As you have seen, the two cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The CX2 having a smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Samsung NX200 will show extra detail with its extra 11 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged CX2 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung NX200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung NX200 Specifications
Ricoh CX2 | Samsung NX200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh CX2 | Samsung NX200 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2009-08-20 | 2012-02-28 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 32 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m (ISO 400) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 185 grams (0.41 pounds) | 223 grams (0.49 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 117 x 63 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 69 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 618 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 photographs |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB-70 | BC1030 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $341 | $818 |