Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung TL350
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung TL350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched February 2010
- Other Name is WB2000
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung TL350 Overview
Below is a comprehensive analysis of the Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung TL350, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the CX2 (9MP) and the TL350 (10MP) is very well matched and they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe CX2 was launched 6 months earlier than the TL350 and they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the CX2 scores against the TL350 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung TL350 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh CX2 & Samsung TL350. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh CX2 Gallery & Samsung TL350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Samsung TL350
| CX2 | TL350 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Ricoh CX2
| TL350 | CX2 |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Samsung TL350
| CX2 | TL350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2009 |  | February 2010 | Similar age |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 920k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung TL350 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh CX2 has got physical measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL350 has dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung TL350 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is the front view scale comparison of the CX2 against the TL350.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the CX2 and TL350 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung TL350 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to imagine the difference between sensor measurements just by looking at specifications. The visual underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the CX2 and TL350.
To sum up, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can expect to see the Samsung TL350 to resolve extra detail utilizing its extra 1MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics far more aggressively.
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung TL350 Specifications
| Ricoh CX2 | Samsung TL350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh CX2 | Samsung TL350 |
| Also called as | - | WB2000 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-08-20 | 2010-02-20 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/2.4-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 920k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m (ISO 400) | 5.20 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 185g (0.41 lbs) | 195g (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | DB-70 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $341 | $400 |