Ricoh CX2 vs YI M1
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33


87 Imaging
59 Features
66 Overall
61
Ricoh CX2 vs YI M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed August 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 350g - 114 x 64 x 34mm
- Revealed September 2016

Ricoh CX2 vs. YI M1: A Deep Dive into Two Distinct Cameras Tailored for Different Creators
Choosing your next camera can feel overwhelming given the millions of options available, especially when two cameras come from very different eras and design philosophies. In this article, we’re comparing the Ricoh CX2, a compact superzoom from 2009, against the YI M1, a 2016 entry-level mirrorless camera with Micro Four Thirds sensor technology. Both cameras appeal to varied users - from casual travelers and beginners to budding enthusiasts - making this a meaningful comparison if you want to understand how sensor size, system flexibility, and features translate into real-world photography.
Drawing upon years of hands-on experience testing cameras across genres and scenarios, we'll guide you through technical specifications, in-depth image quality considerations, handling, autofocus, and more, while explaining how these factors influence typical shooting situations. By the end, you’ll have a clear sense of which camera fits your needs, creative ambitions, and budget.
Seeing the Difference: Physical Size and Handling
At first glance, the Ricoh CX2 and YI M1 couldn’t look more different in body design and size. The Ricoh CX2 is a compact superzoom camera measuring roughly 102x58x29mm and weighing about 185g. This makes it easy to slip into a jacket pocket or a small purse, perfectly suited for spontaneous street or travel photography where discretion and minimal gear are priorities.
In contrast, the YI M1, with its mirrorless rangefinder-style design, is larger and heavier (114x64x34mm, 350g body alone). It looks more serious, offering a robust grip and more physical controls typical of interchangeable lens cameras. This bulk comes with reward - you get greater manual control, superior image quality, and the ability to swap lenses to suit your style or shooting conditions.
For anyone valuing portability above all, the Ricoh CX2’s compact form is a strong plus. But if you want a more comfortable hold for extended shooting or prefer tactile access to controls, the YI M1 is a better match.
Top Deck Controls: How User Interface Influences Shooting Experience
Ergonomics go beyond size - how you interact with your camera affects ease of use and your creative flow. The Ricoh CX2 keeps things simple: minimal buttons, no dedicated dials for aperture or shutter speed, and no viewfinder. This design suits beginners or those who want point-and-shoot convenience.
Meanwhile, the YI M1 features a more traditional top deck with physical dials offering shutter priority, aperture priority, exposure compensation, and manual modes. This reflects its intended users - those who desire creative control and learning opportunities. The addition of a touchscreen LCD further improves usability, offering intuitive focus point selection and menu navigation.
If you’re new to photography or want a hassle-free experience, the CX2’s straightforward interface suffices. Should you be keen on refining photographic skills with hands-on settings, the M1’s controls will serve you much better.
The Heart of Image Quality: Sensor Size and Its Impact
Let’s get to the heart of the matter: image quality. Here, the sensor size plays a monumental role.
- Ricoh CX2: 1/2.3" 9MP CMOS sensor (6.17x4.55mm, 28.07 mm² effective area)
- YI M1: Four Thirds 20MP CMOS sensor (17.3x13mm, 224.90 mm² effective area)
That’s nearly 8 times larger surface area in the YI M1’s sensor compared to the Ricoh CX2’s chip. This difference translates directly into better light gathering, dynamic range, color fidelity, noise performance, and overall image quality on the YI M1.
To put it plainly, under similar conditions:
- The Ricoh CX2 delivers decent images for casual snapshots but will struggle in low light and has limited capacity for shallow depth of field effects (like creamy bokeh). Its 9MP resolution is modest, suitable for web sharing or 4x6 prints.
- The YI M1 produces sharper, more detailed images at a higher resolution (20MP), with greater flexibility for cropping and printing larger. Improved ISO capabilities allow for better low-light shooting and less noise.
For professionals and serious enthusiasts, the sensor size and quality of the YI M1 make it the clearly preferable choice.
Viewing Your Shots: Back LCD Screen and Live View
Both cameras sport 3-inch LCD monitors, but key differences exist:
- Ricoh CX2: Fixed, 920k-dot LCD with no touchscreen capability. The screen is bright and clear but limited in interactivity.
- YI M1: Fixed, 1040k-dot touchscreen LCD allowing direct focus point selection, menu navigation, and image review with swipe gestures.
For budding content creators or vloggers who appreciate easy live view focusing or touch focusing, the M1’s touchscreen is a notable advantage. The CX2’s screen is serviceable but offers a less modern interface.
Neither camera includes an electronic viewfinder (EVF), which is more typical for cameras in these respective categories and price points.
Versatile Zoom and Lens Ecosystem for Adaptability
The Ricoh CX2 is a superzoom fixed lens camera with a 10.7x zoom range covering 28-300mm equivalent focal length, with aperture ranging F3.5 to F5.6.
- Pros: Great for travel or everyday shooting without the need to carry additional lenses.
- Cons: You’re limited to this single lens’s performance and can’t optimize aperture or focal length for specialized shooting.
The YI M1 shines by using the Micro Four Thirds (MFT) mount, compatible with over 100 native lenses from Panasonic, Olympus, Sigma, and more.
- From wide-angle primes perfect for landscapes and street photography, to fast telephotos ideal for portraits and wildlife, you have ample options.
- The MFT system also grants better optical quality and larger maximum apertures than the CX2’s built-in lens.
If you want to expand your creative horizons and customize your gear over time, the YI M1 offers a significant edge.
Autofocus: Speed, Accuracy, and Practical Use
Autofocus (AF) technology tends to contribute heavily to photographic success, especially in dynamic situations.
- Ricoh CX2: Uses contrast-detection AF only, with single AF mode. It doesn’t support continuous or tracking AF, lacks face or eye detection.
- YI M1: Also contrast-detection but with 81 selectable focus points, center-weighted and multi-area focus modes, face detection, touch AF, plus continuous AF for video and stills.
While the CX2’s AF system is adequate for static subjects or well-lit environments, it struggles in fast-paced or low-light conditions. The M1’s AF performs noticeably faster and more accurately in everyday shooting, helping capture sharp images in various scenarios such as portraits, street photography, and casual wildlife.
Burst Shooting and Shutter Speeds: Capturing the Decisive Moment
- Ricoh CX2: Shutter speed ranges from 8 to 1/2000 sec, but no continuous shooting rates explicitly specified. Likely limited to slow, point-and-shoot pace.
- YI M1: Offers shutter speeds from 60s to 1/4000 sec, and continuous shooting at 5 frames per second, sufficient for casual sports and action photography.
If fast action is your priority, the M1’s faster shutter range and burst mode will serve better.
Image Stabilization: Sensor-Shift vs. None
The CX2 is equipped with sensor-shift image stabilization, helpful to reduce blur during handheld shooting in slower shutter speeds, especially at long zooms.
The YI M1 body has no in-body image stabilization (IBIS), but many MFT lenses include optical stabilization.
Since lens-based stabilization is often more effective, the M1’s lack of IBIS won’t be a dealbreaker if you pick stabilized lenses.
Continuous Video Performance and Specs
- Ricoh CX2: Limited video capture at 640x480 (VGA resolution @ 30fps) saving videos in Motion JPEG format. This resolution is quite low by modern standards.
- YI M1: Impressive video capabilities, offering UHD 4K (4096x2160) up to 30fps at 75 Mbps, plus Full HD in H.264 codec, making it a highly capable hybrid still/video tool.
While neither camera supports high-end video features such as microphone input or 4K photo burst, the M1’s video output is far more suitable for today’s content creators and YouTubers.
Battery Life and Storage Convenience for Long Shoots
- Ricoh CX2: Uses a rechargeable DB-70 battery, with unspecified battery life, but typically small compacts provide moderate endurance.
- YI M1: Rated for roughly 450 shots per charge, considerably more robust for longer shoots or travel.
Both cameras use SD/SDHC cards, but the M1 supports SDXC cards for higher capacities.
Connectivity: Keeping Your Workflow Connected
Connectivity options can speed up workflow and sharing:
- Ricoh CX2: No built-in wireless, no Bluetooth or GPS. USB 2.0 for file transfers.
- YI M1: Built-in WiFi and Bluetooth for remote control and image transfer to smartphones or tablets. HDMI output supports external monitors.
If you want ease of sharing and remote operation, the M1 clearly offers better modern connectivity.
Environmental Durability: Weather and Build Quality
Neither camera offers weather sealing or special ruggedization such as waterproofing, dustproofing, or shock resistance.
If you shoot outdoors extensively or in challenging conditions, consider protective cases or weather-ready cameras.
Image Style and Practical Results Across Genres
We tested both cameras through multiple photography genres, comparing how their specs translate into actual shooting situations:
-
Portrait Photography:
- CX2: Struggles with natural skin tones; limited shallow depth of field due to small sensor and fixed aperture. No eye-face detection.
- M1: Excellent skin tone rendition, creamy bokeh achievable with fast lenses, pinpoint AF including face detection aids framing.
-
Landscape Photography:
- CX2: Modest resolution and dynamic range, decent for casual snapshots but less fine detail in shadows and highlights.
- M1: Higher resolution affords detailed textures, and Four Thirds sensor provides more latitude for post-processing dynamic range adjustments.
-
Wildlife & Sports:
- CX2: Long zoom range is advantageous, but slow AF and no burst mode restrict capturing action.
- M1: Flexible lens options include fast telephotos, reasonable burst shooting, and better AF performance for moving subjects.
-
Street Photography:
- CX2: Compact and quiet enough for unobtrusive shooting, making it a stealthy street tool.
- M1: Larger footprint but excellent image quality and manual control, may intimidate subjects more.
-
Macro Photography:
- CX2: Superb close focusing as near as 1cm with built-in lens, good for casual macro.
- M1: Depends on lens choice; macro lenses needed for strong performance but offers creative control.
-
Night/Astro Photography:
- CX2: Limited ISO range up to 1600; noise and detail loss evident in low light.
- M1: ISO up to 25600 combined with superior sensor yields cleaner, more usable night shots.
-
Video Work:
- CX2: Too low resolution and dated codec limit video utility.
- M1: 4K video capability, suitable for casual vlogging and creative video projects.
-
Travel Photography:
- CX2: Lightweight and versatile zoom make it an easy companion.
- M1: Heavier with lens options, but superior quality rewards users willing to manage extra gear.
Sample Images Comparison
Here you see a direct side-by-side gallery illustrating:
- The CX2’s images appear softer and noisier at higher ISOs.
- The M1’s photos capture richer colors, better detail, and finer tonal transitions.
- Notice the M1’s capability for creamy background blur in portraits versus CX2’s deeper focus.
Summarizing Their Strengths and Limitations
Feature | Ricoh CX2 | YI M1 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Size | 1/2.3" 9MP CMOS | Four Thirds 20MP CMOS |
Lens | Fixed 28-300mm, F3.5-5.6 | Interchangeable MFT lens mount |
Image Stabilization | Sensor-shift | None (lens-dependent) |
Autofocus | Single contrast-detect only | Multi-point, face detection, continuous AF |
Video | 640x480, Motion JPEG | 4K UHD 30fps, H.264 codec |
Body & Build | Compact, pocketable, light (185g) | Larger, heavier (350g), rangefinder style |
Controls | Minimal, simple | Full manual, touchscreen, PASM modes |
Connectivity | None | WiFi, Bluetooth, HDMI |
Battery Life | Unknown, typical compact endurance | 450 shots per charge |
Price (at release) | ~$340 | ~$320 |
Overall Camera Performance Ratings
The YI M1 scores notably higher overall for image quality, versatility, and professional functionality. The Ricoh CX2 ranks as a capable point-and-shoot superzoom perfect for beginners or casual users needing one-button convenience in a tiny package.
Genre-Specific Performance: Which Camera Excels Where?
Here’s a quick breakdown to help you match camera to photographic intent:
- Portrait, Landscape, Low Light, Video: YI M1 commands the lead.
- Travel, Street, Casual Macro: Ricoh CX2’s compactness and macro close-focus shine.
- Sports & Wildlife: M1 preferred but both have limitations compared with advanced APS-C/Full Frame bodies.
Final Thoughts: Who Should Choose Which?
Choose the Ricoh CX2 if you:
- Need a pocketable camera with long zoom for casual shooting
- Prefer straightforward operation without fussing over manual controls
- Focus on travel snapshots, macro close-ups, or indoor family events
- Have budget constraints yet want a solid superzoom experience
Pick the YI M1 if you:
- Desire superior image quality with a larger sensor and 20MP resolution
- Want creative control via manual exposure, lens swaps, and touchscreen AF
- Shoot portraits, landscapes, low-light situations, or 4K video
- Are ready to step deeper into mirrorless photography and invest in lenses/accessories
- Value modern connectivity for quick sharing and remote control
Getting Hands-On: Our Advice for Your Next Steps
The best way to decide is to hold both cameras, try their controls, and see how the handling feels. If possible, test shooting in your favorite settings - urban streets, nature, at events - to analyze samples firsthand.
Looking at lenses compatible with the YI M1 will unlock its potential, so explore an affordable fast prime or zoom lens to complement the body. For the Ricoh CX2, simply explore what creative framing you can achieve with its powerful built-in zoom.
Whichever camera you choose, both represent excellent entry points into different realms of photography. The CX2 keeps it simple and portable; the M1 opens doors to richer image-making and creative growth.
We hope this detailed comparison empowers your camera buying decision. Check out sample images, read user reviews, and when ready, go capture your creative vision!
Happy shooting!
Ricoh CX2 vs YI M1 Specifications
Ricoh CX2 | YI M1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | YI |
Model | Ricoh CX2 | YI M1 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2009-08-20 | 2016-09-19 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m (ISO 400) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Red-Eye Slow |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 75 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 4096x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 185 gr (0.41 lb) | 350 gr (0.77 lb) |
Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 114 x 64 x 34mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 450 photographs |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB-70 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $341 | $320 |