Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh GR
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed June 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Revealed April 2013
- Refreshed by Ricoh GR II
Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh GR Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh GR, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Large Sensor Compact and both are designed by Ricoh. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the CX3 (10MP) and GR (16MP) and the CX3 (1/2.3") and GR (APS-C) use different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe CX3 was manufactured 3 years before the GR which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple overview of how the CX3 matches up against the GR in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh GR Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh CX3 and Ricoh GR. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh CX3 Gallery and Ricoh GR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Ricoh GR
CX3 | GR |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Ricoh CX3
GR | CX3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | April 2013 | June 2010 | More modern by 34 months | |
Display resolution | 1230k | 920k | Sharper display (+310k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh CX3 and Ricoh GR
CX3 | GR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display size | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh CX3 provides external dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR has specifications of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh GR in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose during that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the CX3 versus the GR.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the CX3 and GR is 92 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizes just by reading specs. The pic here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the CX3 and GR.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The CX3 because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more difficult and the Ricoh GR will offer more detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged CX3 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh GR Specifications
Ricoh CX3 | Ricoh GR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Ricoh |
Model type | Ricoh CX3 | Ricoh GR |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2010-06-16 | 2013-04-17 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4928 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 300s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/4000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 206 grams (0.45 pounds) | 245 grams (0.54 pounds) |
Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 78 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 972 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 290 shots |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB-100 | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $329 | $971 |