Clicky

Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh GR

Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34
Ricoh CX3 front
 
Ricoh GR front
Portability
90
Imaging
58
Features
54
Overall
56

Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs

Ricoh CX3
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
  • Revealed June 2010
Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8) lens
  • 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
  • Revealed April 2013
  • Refreshed by Ricoh GR II
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh GR Overview

Let's examine more closely at the Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh GR, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Large Sensor Compact and both are designed by Ricoh. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the CX3 (10MP) and GR (16MP) and the CX3 (1/2.3") and GR (APS-C) use different sensor size.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The CX3 was manufactured 3 years before the GR which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple overview of how the CX3 matches up against the GR in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Ricoh GR

 CX3 GR 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Ricoh CX3

 GR CX3 
RevealedApril 2013June 2010More modern by 34 months
Display resolution1230k920kSharper display (+310k dot)

Common features in the Ricoh CX3 and Ricoh GR

 CX3 GR 
Focus manually Dial precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display size
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither provides Touch friendly display

Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison

If you are going to carry around your camera, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh CX3 provides external dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR has specifications of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).

Analyze the Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh GR in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose during that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the CX3 versus the GR.

Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh GR size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the CX3 and GR is 92 and 90 respectively.

Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh GR top view buttons comparison

Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizes just by reading specs. The pic here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the CX3 and GR.

As you can plainly see, each of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The CX3 because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more difficult and the Ricoh GR will offer more detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged CX3 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh GR sensor size comparison

Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh GR Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh CX3 Portrait photography highlights
Ricoh GR Portrait photography highlights
27
has manual focus
no manual mode
no external flash support
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
74
focusing manually
flash sync speed is above average (1/4,000 seconds)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Ricoh CX3 Street photography info
Ricoh GR Street photography info
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (206g)
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
74
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
lighter than others (245 grams)
good high ISO (25,600)
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Ricoh CX3
Sports photography with Ricoh GR
27
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (10MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
45
good resolution (16MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
fixed focal length (28mm)
continuous shooting slow (4.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
lacks phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Ricoh CX3 Travel photography highlights
Ricoh GR Travel photography highlights
66
lighter than competition (206g)
built-in flash
decently wide (28mm)
great reach (300mm)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
71
lighter than others (245g)
good resolution (16MP)
has built in flash
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Ricoh CX3
Landscape photography with Ricoh GR
42
has manual focus
decently wide (28mm)
good sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
no manual mode
sensor resolution low (10MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
62
focusing manually
good sized screen (3 inch)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
good high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW formats
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh CX3 Vlogging information
Ricoh GR Vlogging information
30
decently wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (206g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not offer selfie friendly display
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
no mic support
30
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than others (245 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
lack of mic jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh GR Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX3 and Ricoh GR
 Ricoh CX3Ricoh GR
General Information
Brand Ricoh Ricoh
Model type Ricoh CX3 Ricoh GR
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Large Sensor Compact
Revealed 2010-06-16 2013-04-17
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.7 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 372.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4928 x 3264
Highest native ISO 3200 25600
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-300mm (10.7x) 28mm (1x)
Maximal aperture f/3.5-5.6 f/2.8
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 920 thousand dot 1,230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8s 300s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed - 4.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 4.00 m 5.40 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync -
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync - 1/4000s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 206 grams (0.45 pounds) 245 grams (0.54 pounds)
Dimensions 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 78
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 23.6
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 13.5
DXO Low light rating not tested 972
Other
Battery life - 290 shots
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID DB-100 DB65
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) Yes
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD, SDHC, SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Retail cost $329 $971