Clicky

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung HZ35W

Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34
Ricoh CX3 front
 
Samsung HZ35W front
Portability
91
Imaging
35
Features
42
Overall
37

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs

Ricoh CX3
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
  • Launched June 2010
Samsung HZ35W
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
  • Revealed June 2010
  • Alternate Name is WB650
Photography Glossary

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview

Here is a in-depth analysis of the Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung HZ35W, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the CX3 (10MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is pretty similar and both cameras have the identical sensor size (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The CX3 was introduced within a month of the HZ35W and they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a simple summation of how the CX3 grades vs the HZ35W with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Samsung HZ35W

 CX3 HZ35W 
Screen resolution920k614kSharper screen (+306k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Ricoh CX3

 HZ35W CX3 

Common features in the Ricoh CX3 and Samsung HZ35W

 CX3 HZ35W 
RevealedJune 2010June 2010Similar age
Manually focus Dial precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen size
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch screen Neither has Touch screen

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to carry your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh CX3 has external measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ35W has specifications of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).

Look at the Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung HZ35W in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the CX3 vs the HZ35W.

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung HZ35W size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the CX3 and HZ35W is 92 and 91 respectively.

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung HZ35W top view buttons comparison

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be difficult to see the gap between sensor sizing just by going over technical specs. The graphic underneath may give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the CX3 and HZ35W.

As you can tell, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Samsung HZ35W to offer you greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively.

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung HZ35W sensor size comparison

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh CX3 Portrait photography factors
Samsung HZ35W Portrait photography factors
27
you can focus manually
no manual control
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
34
has manual focus
offers face detection autofocus
external flash not possible
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Ricoh CX3 Street photography info
Samsung HZ35W Street photography info
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (206g)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
60
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (245 grams)
screen is fixed
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Ricoh CX3 Sports photography features
Samsung HZ35W Sports photography features
27
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
megapixel count low (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
42
great zoom range (24-360mm 15.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
offers tracking autofocus
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Ricoh CX3
Travel photography with Samsung HZ35W
66
lighter than competition (206g)
has built in flash
decently wide (28mm)
long reach (300mm)
megapixel count low (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
63
lighter than others (245 grams)
flash built-in
really wide (24mm)
very long reach (360mm)
missing Timelapse recording
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh CX3 Landscape photography advice
Samsung HZ35W Landscape photography advice
42
you can focus manually
decently wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
no manual control
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
43
has manual focus
really wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
missing Timelapse recording
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh CX3 Vlogging details
Samsung HZ35W Vlogging details
30
decently wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (206 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have mic port
31
really wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection autofocus
lighter than others (245 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external microphone jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX3 and Samsung HZ35W
 Ricoh CX3Samsung HZ35W
General Information
Brand Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh CX3 Samsung HZ35W
Also referred to as - WB650
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2010-06-16 2010-06-16
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-300mm (10.7x) 24-360mm (15.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.5-5.6 f/3.2-5.8
Macro focusing distance 1cm 3cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 920 thousand dot 614 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 seconds 16 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.00 m 5.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 206 grams (0.45 lbs) 245 grams (0.54 lbs)
Physical dimensions 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID DB-100 SLB-11A
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Pricing at release $329 $300