Clicky

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung SL202

Portability
92
Imaging
33
Features
35
Overall
33
Ricoh CX3 front
 
Samsung SL202 front
Portability
94
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs

Ricoh CX3
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
  • Launched June 2010
Samsung SL202
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Announced February 2009
  • Additionally Known as PL50
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung SL202 Overview

Below, we will be reviewing the Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung SL202, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the CX3 (10MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is pretty well matched and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The CX3 was manufactured 17 months later than the SL202 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick overview of how the CX3 grades versus the SL202 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Samsung SL202

 CX3 SL202 
AnnouncedJune 2010February 2009Fresher by 17 months
Manually focus More accurate focusing
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kSharper screen (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Ricoh CX3

 SL202 CX3 

Common features in the Ricoh CX3 and Samsung SL202

 CX3 SL202 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither comes with Touch friendly screen

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX3 comes with exterior dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL202 has sizing of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).

Look at the Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung SL202 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the CX3 and the SL202.

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung SL202 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the CX3 and SL202 is 92 and 94 respectively.

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung SL202 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it's difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizing simply by checking specs. The photograph below will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the CX3 and SL202.

All in all, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the identical MP so you should expect similar quality of images however you may want to take the release date of the products into consideration. The more recent CX3 should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung SL202 sensor size comparison

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh CX3 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung SL202 as a Portrait photography camera
26
you can focus manually
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
25
provides face detection focus
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Ricoh CX3 Street photography factors
Samsung SL202 Street photography factors
60
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (206 grams)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
47
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Ricoh CX3 Sports photography info
Samsung SL202 Sports photography info
26
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
16
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Ricoh CX3 Travel photography highlights
Samsung SL202 Travel photography highlights
66
lighter than competition in class (206 grams)
built-in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
long reach (300mm)
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
57
flash built-in
quite wide (28mm)
no Timelapse function
MP count low (10MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh CX3 Landscape photography details
Samsung SL202 Landscape photography details
42
you can focus manually
pretty wide (28mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
manual mode not possible
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
27
quite wide (28mm)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
small screen (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not possible
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
no Timelapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Ricoh CX3
Vlogging with Samsung SL202
30
pretty wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (206 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have external mic jack
27
quite wide (28mm)
provides face detection focus
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
no external microphone socket
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX3 and Samsung SL202
 Ricoh CX3Samsung SL202
General Information
Make Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh CX3 Samsung SL202
Other name - PL50
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2010-06-16 2009-02-17
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 3200 1600
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-300mm (10.7x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Max aperture f/3.5-5.6 f/2.8-5.7
Macro focus distance 1cm 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 2.7 inch
Display resolution 920 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 8 secs 8 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/1500 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 4.00 m 4.60 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 206 gr (0.45 pounds) 168 gr (0.37 pounds)
Dimensions 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model DB-100 SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) Yes
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Price at release $329 $140