Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB750
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
93 Imaging
36 Features
50 Overall
41
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed June 2010
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
- Released September 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB750 Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Ricoh CX3 and Samsung WB750, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the CX3 (10MP) and WB750 (13MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe CX3 was released 14 months earlier than the WB750 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a detailed comparison, here is a short overview of how the CX3 scores vs the WB750 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB750 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh CX3 & Samsung WB750. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh CX3 Gallery & Samsung WB750 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Samsung WB750
| CX3 | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Ricoh CX3
| WB750 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2011 |  | June 2010 | Newer by 14 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX3 and Samsung WB750
| CX3 | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither offers Touch screen |
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh CX3 offers exterior dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB750 has dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh CX3 and Samsung WB750 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the CX3 and the WB750.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the CX3 and WB750 is 92 and 93 respectively.
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to envision the difference between sensor dimensions just by reviewing technical specs. The image here should give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX3 and WB750.
As you have seen, both cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Samsung WB750 to deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged CX3 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB750 Specifications
| Ricoh CX3 | Samsung WB750 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh CX3 | Samsung WB750 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-06-16 | 2011-09-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 13MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4096 x 3072 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 3.30 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206 grams (0.45 lb) | 193 grams (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | DB-100 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $329 | $339 |