Ricoh CX3 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
57 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51
Ricoh CX3 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched June 2010
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Introduced April 2012
- Superseded the Sigma SD1
Ricoh CX3 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview
Following is a in depth assessment of the Ricoh CX3 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by brands Ricoh and Sigma. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the CX3 (10MP) and SD1 Merrill (15MP) and the CX3 (1/2.3") and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe CX3 was unveiled 22 months earlier than the SD1 Merrill which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going straight into a thorough comparison, below is a short summary of how the CX3 matches up vs the SD1 Merrill for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh CX3 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh CX3 & Sigma SD1 Merrill. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh CX3 Gallery & Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Sigma SD1 Merrill
CX3 | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Ricoh CX3
SD1 Merrill | CX3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | April 2012 | June 2010 | More modern by 22 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX3 and Sigma SD1 Merrill
CX3 | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh CX3 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX3 has got external measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD1 Merrill has sizing of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") with a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).
Check the Ricoh CX3 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the CX3 against the SD1 Merrill.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the CX3 and SD1 Merrill is 92 and 57 respectively.
Ricoh CX3 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizes purely by viewing a spec sheet. The picture here may give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the CX3 and SD1 Merrill.
As you can see, the 2 cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The CX3 having a smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Sigma SD1 Merrill will provide you with more detail having an extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged CX3 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh CX3 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX3 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications
Ricoh CX3 | Sigma SD1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model | Ricoh CX3 | Sigma SD1 Merrill |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2010-06-16 | 2012-04-10 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | Dual True II |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4800 x 3200 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8s | - |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 206g (0.45 pounds) | 790g (1.74 pounds) |
Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | DB-100 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $329 | $2,339 |