Clicky

Ricoh CX3 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill

Portability
92
Imaging
33
Features
35
Overall
33
Ricoh CX3 front
 
Sigma SD1 Merrill front
Portability
57
Imaging
56
Features
45
Overall
51

Ricoh CX3 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs

Ricoh CX3
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
  • Launched June 2010
Sigma SD1 Merrill
(Full Review)
  • 15MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
  • Introduced April 2012
  • Superseded the Sigma SD1
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh CX3 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview

Following is a in depth assessment of the Ricoh CX3 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by brands Ricoh and Sigma. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the CX3 (10MP) and SD1 Merrill (15MP) and the CX3 (1/2.3") and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor size.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The CX3 was unveiled 22 months earlier than the SD1 Merrill which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before going straight into a thorough comparison, below is a short summary of how the CX3 matches up vs the SD1 Merrill for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Sigma SD1 Merrill

 CX3 SD1 Merrill 
Screen resolution920k460kClearer screen (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Ricoh CX3

 SD1 Merrill CX3 
IntroducedApril 2012June 2010More modern by 22 months

Common features in the Ricoh CX3 and Sigma SD1 Merrill

 CX3 SD1 Merrill 
Manual focus Very exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen size
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither contains Touch friendly screen

Ricoh CX3 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison

If you are going to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX3 has got external measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD1 Merrill has sizing of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") with a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).

Check the Ricoh CX3 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the CX3 against the SD1 Merrill.

Ricoh CX3 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the CX3 and SD1 Merrill is 92 and 57 respectively.

Ricoh CX3 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill top view buttons comparison

Ricoh CX3 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it's tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizes purely by viewing a spec sheet. The picture here may give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the CX3 and SD1 Merrill.

As you can see, the 2 cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The CX3 having a smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Sigma SD1 Merrill will provide you with more detail having an extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged CX3 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Ricoh CX3 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill sensor size comparison

Ricoh CX3 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh CX3 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh CX3 Portrait photography info
Sigma SD1 Merrill Portrait photography info
26
has manual focus
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
65
focusing manually
megapixel count decent (15MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
no liveview feature
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Ricoh CX3 Street photography advice
Sigma SD1 Merrill Street photography advice
60
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (206 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
57
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
environment proof
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Ricoh CX3 Sports photography info
Sigma SD1 Merrill Sports photography info
26
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
61
megapixel count decent (15MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
environment proof
supports phase detect auto focus
no liveview feature
lack of image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Ricoh CX3 as a Travel photography camera
Sigma SD1 Merrill as a Travel photography camera
66
lighter than average in class (206g)
has built in flash
rather wide (28mm)
long reach (300mm)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
54
environment proof
megapixel count decent (15 megapixels)
no Time Lapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Ricoh CX3
Landscape photography with Sigma SD1 Merrill
42
has manual focus
rather wide (28mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual exposure
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
63
focusing manually
swap lenses (Sigma SA mount)
decent sized screen (3")
megapixel count decent (15 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
environment proof
no liveview feature
lack of image stabilization
no Time Lapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh CX3 Vlogging info
Sigma SD1 Merrill Vlogging info
30
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (206 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have microphone socket
9
lack of video recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Ricoh CX3 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX3 and Sigma SD1 Merrill
 Ricoh CX3Sigma SD1 Merrill
General Information
Make Ricoh Sigma
Model Ricoh CX3 Sigma SD1 Merrill
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced DSLR
Launched 2010-06-16 2012-04-10
Body design Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Smooth Imaging Engine IV Dual True II
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 24 x 16mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 384.0mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 15 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 -
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 4800 x 3200
Highest native ISO 3200 6400
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens focal range 28-300mm (10.7x) -
Largest aperture f/3.5-5.6 -
Macro focus range 1cm -
Total lenses - 76
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 920k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 96 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.64x
Features
Min shutter speed 8s -
Max shutter speed 1/2000s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.00 m no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync no built-in flash
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) -
Highest video resolution 1280x720 None
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 206g (0.45 pounds) 790g (1.74 pounds)
Dimensions 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model DB-100 -
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) Yes
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible)
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $329 $2,339