Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-3N
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
89 Imaging
57 Features
52 Overall
55
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-3N Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced June 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
- Launched February 2013
- Earlier Model is Sony NEX-F3
- New Model is Sony a5000
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-3N Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Ricoh CX3 and Sony NEX-3N, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Ricoh and Sony. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the CX3 (10MP) and NEX-3N (16MP) and the CX3 (1/2.3") and NEX-3N (APS-C) have totally different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe CX3 was introduced 3 years prior to the NEX-3N and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-3N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short highlight of how the CX3 matches up vs the NEX-3N with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-3N Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh CX3 and Sony Alpha NEX-3N. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh CX3 Gallery and Sony NEX-3N Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Sony NEX-3N
CX3 | NEX-3N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Ricoh CX3
NEX-3N | CX3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2013 | June 2010 | More recent by 32 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Ricoh CX3 and Sony NEX-3N
CX3 | NEX-3N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-3N Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Ricoh CX3 has got outer measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-3N has proportions of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
See the Ricoh CX3 and Sony NEX-3N in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the CX3 versus the NEX-3N.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the CX3 and NEX-3N is 92 and 89 respectively.
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-3N Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to envision the gap in sensor measurements merely by researching specifications. The visual below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the CX3 and NEX-3N.
To sum up, both the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The CX3 with its smaller sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Sony NEX-3N will provide you with extra detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics way more aggressively. The older CX3 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-3N Specifications
Ricoh CX3 | Sony Alpha NEX-3N | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh CX3 | Sony Alpha NEX-3N |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2010-06-16 | 2013-02-25 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4912 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 16000 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 206g (0.45 pounds) | 269g (0.59 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 74 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1067 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 480 photographs |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB-100 | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $329 | $399 |