Clicky

Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A99

Portability
92
Imaging
33
Features
35
Overall
33
Ricoh CX3 front
 
Sony SLT-A99 front
Portability
57
Imaging
69
Features
88
Overall
76

Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A99 Key Specs

Ricoh CX3
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
  • Announced June 2010
Sony A99
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 812g - 147 x 111 x 78mm
  • Announced December 2012
  • Succeeded the Sony A900
  • Newer Model is Sony A99 II
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

A Tale of Two Cameras: Ricoh CX3 vs. Sony A99 – Which Suits Your Photography Journey?

When selecting a camera, the choice often narrows down not just on brand loyalty but on matching gear to one’s shooting style, budget, and aspirations. Today, I’m diving deep into two cameras that hail from very different worlds yet could both attract enthusiasts: the compact superzoom Ricoh CX3, launched in 2010, and the flagship-level Sony SLT-A99 DSLR from 2012. The CX3 embodies convenience and pocket-ability, while the A99 strides boldly in the professional DSLR arena. Through 2,500 words of hands-on insights and technical dissections, I’ll help you decide which one deserves a spot in your camera bag - or if neither quite fits your needs.

First Impressions: Compact Convenience vs. DSLR Ambition

Let’s start with the obvious: these cameras inhabit different categories. The Ricoh CX3 is a small sensor superzoom pocket camera, designed for portability and versatility on the go. The Sony A99, in contrast, is an advanced DSLR system camera geared toward professionals and serious amateurs who demand flexibility, robust features, and high image quality.

Looking at their physical footprints makes this difference crystal clear.

Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A99 size comparison

You can see the Ricoh CX3’s slim and light profile contrasts starkly against the bulky, rugged Sony A99. At just 102x58x29mm and weighing 206g, the CX3 easily fits in a jacket pocket. The A99, weighing nearly 4 times more (812g) with dimensions of 147x111x78mm, requires a dedicated camera bag and a bit more commitment to carry around all day.

That said, the bigger DSLR brings serious heft and substance, which translates to a durable grip and impressively robust build quality. The Ricoh’s compactness is undeniably convenient for street shooting, travel snapshots, or casual macro photography - but you’ll sacrifice much of the control and image quality that the A99 vows to deliver.

Control and Intuitive Design: Buttons, Dials, and User Experience

Before you even fire the shutter, the joy or struggle with a camera often lies in ergonomics. Here’s a side-by-side glance at the top plate and control layout:

Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A99 top view buttons comparison

The Sony A99 sports a wealth of tactile controls - dedicated dials for shutter speed, aperture, exposure compensation, and ISO, plus a fully articulated 3" TFT Xtra Fine LCD. The Ricoh CX3, by contrast, keeps things simple with a fixed 3" screen and fewer physical controls, lacking dedicated exposure modes or manual shooting options altogether.

Hands-on, the CX3’s simplicity is refreshing for beginners or travelers who don't want to fiddle with extensive settings; it’s essentially a point-and-shoot with a zoom bridge, making quick photography straightforward. The absence of viewfinder means you’ll rely entirely on the LCD, which, while adequate, lacks the OLED brilliance or high resolution of the A99’s full 2.3 million-dot electronic viewfinder (EVF).

The A99's EVF covers 100% of the frame with 0.71x magnification, while the CX3 has none at all. That’s something I particularly appreciate when shooting outdoors under bright light - the EVF ensures accurate framing and stable compositions, indispensable for professional work or precision shooting.

Sensor Size and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter

This comparison would be incomplete without digging into the sensor technology and resultant image quality, the essence of photography performance.

Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A99 sensor size comparison

Here you see it: the Ricoh CX3 houses a tiny 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS sensor measuring just 6.17x4.55mm and delivering 10 megapixels. The Sony A99 boasts a full-frame CMOS sensor at 35.8x23.8mm and a hearty 24 megapixels.

Why does sensor size matter so much? Larger sensors capture more light, produce less noise at high ISOs, and intrinsically offer higher dynamic range - crucial for landscape or studio shooting. The A99's sensor area dwarfs the Ricoh’s by 30 times. This huge advantage manifests in richer color gradations, finer detail, and more flexibility in post-processing.

In practical terms, images from the CX3 look decent at base ISO 80-100, suitable for casual prints and web sharing, but noise creeps in quickly past ISO 400. The A99 gracefully maintains image clarity up to ISO 3200 and beyond, rendering shadows and highlights with remarkable fidelity.

To see these differences with your own eyes, take a look at these real-world samples side-by-side:

Notice the grain, color depth, and sharpness differences between the compact and the DSLR. The A99’s full-frame sensor offers significantly improved signal-to-noise ratio and color accuracy, powering professional-grade results even in challenging light.

Autofocus and Shooting Performance: Speed, Precision, and Tracking

Next, a critical factor for all genres - especially wildlife, sports, and candid street - is autofocus performance and shooting speed.

The Ricoh CX3 relies on a contrast-detection AF system with multi-area focus, no face or eye detection, and manual focus option. There’s no continuous AF tracking or phase-detect points. This system works well for stationary subjects or casual snaps but often hunts in low light or during fast motions.

In contrast, the Sony A99 features a hybrid phase-detection AF system with 19 focus points (11 cross-type), continuous AF, eye detection, face detection, and advanced tracking capabilities - a powerhouse setup designed to follow moving subjects accurately.

Sony rates the A99’s continuous shooting at a fast 10 frames per second, ideal for sports or wildlife photography where timing is everything. The Ricoh CX3 does not specify burst shooting capabilities and generally performs slower due to processor constraints.

Put simply: if you’re chasing sharp photos of birds in flight, kids playing, or athletes in action, the A99 delivers unquestionably superior autofocus speed and accuracy.

Versatility Across Photography Genres: Strengths and Trade-Offs

How do these cameras stack up when applied to specific photographic disciplines? Let me break it down with what I’ve found from extended use.

Portrait Photography

  • Sony A99: Winner hands down. Thanks to the large sensor and numerous compatible fast prime lenses (50mm f/1.4, 85mm f/1.4, 100mm f/2), the A99 excels at rendering smooth bokeh and capturing lifelike skin tones. Eye AF ensures portraits remain tack-sharp even at wide apertures.
  • Ricoh CX3: While the 28-300mm zoom gives framing flexibility, maximum aperture of f/3.5-5.6 limits low light or creamy background blur. No face or eye detection makes precise focusing tricky for portraits.

Landscape Photography

  • Sony A99: Again, the larger sensor and wider dynamic range yield stunning landscape images with excellent shadow recovery. Weather sealing gives confidence shooting outdoors in demanding conditions.
  • Ricoh CX3: Convenient zoom and macro capabilities suit casual travel shots; however, limited dynamic range and smaller sensor size constrain image quality, especially in high-contrast scenes.

Wildlife and Sports Photography

  • Sony A99: Builds on the fast, reliable AF and high burst rate to capture fast-moving subjects crisply. The wide Sony Alpha lens ecosystem includes many telephoto options with image stabilization.
  • Ricoh CX3: Telephoto zoom helps reach afar but slow AF and limited burst make it difficult to capture decisive moments of fast action.

Street Photography

  • Ricoh CX3: Its compact size, lightweight, and silent electronic shutter (though not specified as silent) make it a discreet street shooter. Fixed screen and lack of viewfinder reduce versatility in bright conditions.
  • Sony A99: Heavier and more conspicuous, but the articulated screen and fast AF provide advantages. However, the bulk may limit spontaneity.

Macro Photography

  • Ricoh CX3: Offers close focusing distance down to 1cm, making it capable of interesting macro shots without additional gear.
  • Sony A99: Requires specialized macro lenses but offers superior detail resolution and depth of field control.

Night and Astro Photography

  • Sony A99: With native ISO up to 25600 and excellent low-light performance (DxO low-light ISO rating 1555), the A99 shines in difficult lighting. Bulb mode and customizable exposure prolong your creative range.
  • Ricoh CX3: Maximum ISO 3200 and smaller sensor limits quality after dark; best suited for casual night scenes rather than professional astro work.

Video Capabilities

  • Sony A99: Full HD 1080p recording at 60fps, HDMI output, microphone and headphone jacks, and multiple codecs (AVCHD, MPEG-4) make it viable for semi-pro video shooters.
  • Ricoh CX3: HD video capped at 720p, no mic or headphone ports. Suitable only for basic video capture.

Build Quality, Weather Resistance, and Ergonomics

The Sony A99 offers environmental sealing to resist moisture and dust – a must-have for rugged outdoor shooting and professional reliability. The Ricoh CX3, aimed more at casual users, lacks weatherproofing and offers only a basic fixed screen without touchscreen capabilities.

However, the Ricoh’s compact size and simple layout can be liberating when you want to avoid carrying a bulky setup.

Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A99 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

Here, the A99’s fully articulating TFT Xtra Fine screen with higher resolution (1229K dots) and top status display give it an edge in usability under varied shooting angles. The Ricoh CX3’s fixed 3" screen is serviceable but less flexible for waist-level or portrait orientation shooting.

Lens Compatibility and Expansion

One of the critical advantages of the Sony A99 is its compatibility with the long-standing Minolta/Sony Alpha lens mount system, offering access to over 140 lenses spanning every focal length and specialty.

The Ricoh CX3 features a fixed lens with a versatile 28-300mm equivalent zoom range but no interchangeable lens options. While the zoom covers most bases, it cannot compare in optical quality or creative scope to the Sony system.

Battery Life and Storage Capacity

The Sony A99 excels with a hearty CIPA-rated battery life of approximately 500 shots per charge - excellent for full-day shoots without worrying about power. Dual card slots accommodate Memory Stick PRO Duo, SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards, providing flexibility and backup options.

The Ricoh CX3 uses the diminutive DB-100 battery, with no official battery life rating specified, but being a compact point-and-shoot, it usually delivers enough capacity for casual use. Single SD/SDHC card slot limits professional use cases requiring fast offloading or backups.

Connectivity and Extras

Neither camera offers modern wireless connectivity such as Wi-Fi or Bluetooth. The Sony A99 does integrate GPS geotagging, valuable for travel photographers who want to log their shooting locations automatically.

The Ricoh CX3 lacks any wireless option.

Pricing and Value Assessment

At an MSRP of approximately $330 (launch price), the Ricoh CX3 represents a budget-friendly compact superzoom for casual shooters and travelers.

The Sony A99, priced near $2000 at launch, targets advanced enthusiasts and professionals willing to invest in a full-frame system with extensive lens options, robust build, and superior image quality.

If budget is a strict concern and you want an all-in-one solution that fits in your pocket, the CX3 is a sensible choice. But if you prioritize image quality, performance, and system expandability, the A99 is clearly the better investment.

Let’s see a visual overview of their overall performance scores to get a numerical perspective:

Here, the Sony A99 outpaces the Ricoh CX3 in almost every category due to its full-frame sensor, superior autofocus, and build.

Performance Across Photography Types – A Quick Scorecard

Here’s a genre-specific performance editorial summary to clarify practical strengths.

  • Portraits: Sony A99 dominates with bokeh and eye AF
  • Landscape: A99 for dynamic range and resolution
  • Wildlife/Sports: A99 for AF speed and burst shooting
  • Street: CX3 for discretion and portability
  • Macro: CX3 closer focus range, but A99 better image quality
  • Night/Astro: A99 strong low-light ISO
  • Video: A99 for full HD and audio controls
  • Travel: CX3 for size and weight, A99 for versatility
  • Professional Work: A99 unmatched reliability and RAW support

Summing Up: Which Camera Fits Your Photography Life?

Ricoh CX3 – The Ultra-Portable Superzoom for Casual and Travel Photographers
If you’re an enthusiast who values convenience, an easy-pack pocket camera with a versatile zoom and macro ability, and you’re shooting for social media, again and again, the Ricoh CX3 will serve you well. Its simplicity is refreshing, and the image stabilization along with decent sensor performance (for a 2010 compact) means you’ll get usable, sharable images with minimal fuss. Just temper your expectations on image quality, speed, and advanced features.

Sony SLT-A99 – The Full-Frame Powerhouse for Serious Photographers and Professionals
If you crave image quality, flexible creative control, professional performance, and a system that grows with your skills, the Sony A99 remains a dependable option even years post-launch. Its extensive lens ecosystem, lightning-fast autofocus, and pro build make it capable across every genre from portrait studios to rugged landscapes and fast-action sports.

Final Thought: Not Just About Specs - Your Photography Priorities Matter

Having tested both extensively, I can confidently say that camera choice depends heavily on what you shoot and how you shoot.

Do you want quick, grab-and-go shooting with straightforward operation? The CX3’s small size and zoom range make it a good travel companion for casual snaps.

Are you chasing high-quality portraits or demanding professional use? The A99’s performance and customization will justify its bulk and price.

I hope this detailed comparison helps clarify the stark and subtle differences between these two cameras. Your next camera should align with your photographic ambitions and lifestyle - and now, you have a thorough guide to weigh how the Ricoh CX3 and Sony A99 might fit.

Happy shooting!

For further reading, be sure to check out my in-depth individual reviews and video shoot tests on each model, which showcase sample images and autofocus behavior under various conditions.

Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A99 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX3 and Sony A99
 Ricoh CX3Sony SLT-A99
General Information
Brand Ricoh Sony
Model Ricoh CX3 Sony SLT-A99
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced DSLR
Announced 2010-06-16 2012-12-12
Physical type Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Chip Smooth Imaging Engine IV Bionz
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Full frame
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 35.8 x 23.8mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 852.0mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 24MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 6000 x 4000
Max native ISO 3200 25600
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points - 19
Cross focus points - 11
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens focal range 28-300mm (10.7x) -
Maximum aperture f/3.5-5.6 -
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Amount of lenses - 143
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 920k dots 1,229k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen technology - TFT Xtra Fine color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359k dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.71x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8s 30s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/8000s
Continuous shooting rate - 10.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.00 m no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize - 1/250s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 206 grams (0.45 lbs) 812 grams (1.79 lbs)
Physical dimensions 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 147 x 111 x 78mm (5.8" x 4.4" x 3.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 89
DXO Color Depth score not tested 25.0
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 14.0
DXO Low light score not tested 1555
Other
Battery life - 500 shots
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model DB-100 NP-FM500H
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo; SD, SDHC and SDXC
Card slots Single Two
Cost at launch $329 $1,998