Ricoh CX4 vs Sony HX80: The Small Sensor Superzoom Showdown

Choosing the right compact superzoom camera often feels like walking a tightrope between features, image quality, and real-world usability. Today, I’m diving deep into two intriguing rivals from different eras and design philosophies: the Ricoh CX4, announced back in 2010, and Sony’s more recent Cyber-shot DSC-HX80 from 2016. Both pack small 1/2.3" sensors and offer versatile zoom ranges, yet they cater to slightly different photography appetites and styles.

Having tested thousands of cameras hands-on, I’m bringing you a detailed, no-nonsense comparison based on actual usage, technical dissection, and my years of experience tracking camera tech evolution. So buckle up for a comprehensive, approachable, and occasionally cheeky exploration of these two intriguing superzooms - aiming to help you decide which gem (if either) suits your photographic journey.

First Impressions: Size, Feel, and Handling

Before we plunge into specs, usability and comfort matter - after all, how often have I seen cameras with all the bells and whistles fail because they're awkward to hold or clunky to operate?

Here’s a visual size and handling comparison to set the stage:

At first glance, both cameras are comfortably pocketable, but they each approach compactness differently. The Ricoh CX4 feels leaner and lighter at 205g with a slim profile of 102x59x29mm. It’s a sleek little thing that fits nicely in a jacket pocket or small purse. Sony’s HX80 weighs 245g, adding a bit more heft and bulk (102x58x36mm), primarily due to its longer zoom lens and added features like an electronic viewfinder.

Ergonomically, the Ricoh’s more minimalist approach suits casual shooters who want straightforward grab-and-go portability without fuss. The HX80, while still handy, hints at a more serious enthusiast’s camera with extra buttons and a substantial grip area that invites prolonged shoots.

Both handle well, but my personal preference tends to lean toward the HX80 if you prioritize stability and tactile feedback - especially for more intense sessions. The Ricoh is better when pocket space is at a premium or when you want a stealthier street camera that won’t weigh you down.

A Peek at the Controls: Which One Puts You In the Driver’s Seat?

Usability lives and dies by the control layout. I always test how intuitive a camera feels in the hand, how easy it is to switch settings on the fly, and how much it invites or discourages creative manual intervention.

Check out their top view to see how the makers have arranged their command centers:

Sony HX80 sports an impressive array of control dials and buttons - including dedicated exposure compensation and mode dials, physical zoom lever, and a tilting screen control that facilitates creative angles. Manual exposure modes (aperture priority, shutter priority, full manual) are supported, giving you a playground for experimentation.

In contrast, Ricoh CX4 simplifies things to a point some might find restrictive: no dedicated exposure modes like aperture priority or shutter priority, no physical exposure compensation, and only single auto-focus mode with simple focus area selection. This minimalist interface caters well to casual shooters but frustrates enthusiasts who want more creative control.

If you’re someone itching to manipulate exposure or focus precisely, the HX80’s controls will feel like a breath of fresh air. For point-and-shoot simplicity, Ricoh’s approach stays neat and straightforward.

Under the Hood: Sensor and Image Quality Realities

Here is where the rubber meets the road - sensor tech and resolution often define the final image quality, even in small sensor cameras.

Both cameras utilize a 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS sensor measuring 6.17 x 4.55 mm (28.07 mm² sensor area), a common size for compact superzooms. However, the Ricoh CX4 has a modest 10 MP resolution (3648x2736 max), while the Sony HX80 pushes 18 MP (4896x3672 max).

To visualize the sensor specs and their potential impact:

Higher resolution in the Sony can yield more detail and cropping flexibility, but it also risks higher noise at elevated ISOs due to smaller pixel sizes - something we’ll dig into shortly.

For image processing, Ricoh’s Smooth Imaging Engine IV improves color reproduction and noise control for its time, but Sony’s Bionz X processor, a more recent and powerful engine, offers advanced noise reduction, edge refinement, and texture retention.

Testing Observations:

• Ricoh CX4: Images are pleasant in good light with decent dynamic range for a 2010 model but show softness creeping in at focal lengths beyond 200mm equivalent. Color science feels warm and friendly, which some portrait shooters may enjoy. JPEGs tend to smear fine detail at higher ISOs (above 800).
• Sony HX80: Delivers noticeably sharper images with better detail rendition up to ISO 800, still usable at 1600, and even 3200 if you are cautious. Dynamic range is impressively broad for the sensor size, with improved highlight retention and richer shadows.

Overall, Sony's sensor and processor combo confidently outranks the Ricoh in pure image quality terms, especially for enthusiasts seeking better low-light performance or cropping options.

Screen and Electronic Viewfinder: Composing and Reviewing Your Shots

Many photographers underestimate how much the LCD and EVF contribute to a satisfying shooting experience.

Let’s peek at the rear screens:

Ricoh’s 3-inch fixed LCD with 920k dots is crisp but non-touch and non-articulated, meaning limited flexibility for awkward angle shooting. The simple menu system and lack of touchscreen make navigation linear, which may frustrate those accustomed to modern interfaces.

Sony’s 3-inch LCD is virtually identical in resolution (921k dots) but tilts - a huge benefit if you like low or overhead composition angles, indie film style. It also benefits from an integrated electronic viewfinder with 100% coverage, meaning you can use it for bright conditions where LCD visibility plummets.

For street and travel photographers, having that EVF and tilting screen combo is invaluable, making Sony a clear win here.

Autofocus, Stabilization, and Speed: Catch That Action or Not?

Autofocus systems can be a make-or-break for anyone shooting anything dynamic, be it kids, wildlife, or sports.

The Ricoh CX4’s contrast-detection AF with multi-area selection provides adequate focus in bright, simple scenes but is sluggish and prone to hunting in low light or complex environments. Only single AF is available, with no continuous tracking.

By contrast, Sony HX80 packs a much more sophisticated AF setup: contrast detection with face detection, AF tracking, continuous AF mode, and multi-area AF. It locks onto subjects faster, holds focus through movement more reliably, and doesn’t throw fits as often in low light.

Image stabilization is sensor-shift in Ricoh’s case, which works well given the short zoom range but can struggle at full 300mm reach. Sony uses optical image stabilization, which is generally more effective, especially important given the HX80’s whopping 720mm equivalent reach (30x zoom).

Continuous shooting also favors Sony, offering 10fps versus Ricoh’s 5fps.

In real-world tests, these differences are plain as day: Sony’s autofocus and stabilization enable tighter, sharper shots of moving subjects even handheld, while Ricoh requires patience and controlled environments.

Zoom Range and Lens Performance: Shooting Versatility

Ricoh CX4 sports a 28-300mm equivalent zoom (10.7x) with a maximum aperture of f/3.5-5.6, while Sony HX80 impresses with 24-720mm equivalent (30x) and f/3.5-6.4.

Here’s how their zoom powers stack visually:

• Ricoh CX4: Broad enough for landscapes and moderate telephoto; starts at a slightly longer wide end (28mm) which is decent but not ultra-wide.
• Sony HX80: Superzoom territory, covering wide-angle starting at 24mm and diving deep to 720mm, perfect for wildlife, sports, or surveillance-style shooting.

Macro capabilities differ as well: Ricoh edges out with a close focus distance of 1cm versus Sony’s 5cm, allowing you to capture nearer subjects with better magnification in close-up shots.

Lens sharpness is generally better on Sony throughout the zoom range, despite some softness at the extreme 720mm end - a common limitation in compact superzooms.

Image Samples: What Do They Really Look Like?

Nothing beats seeing actual images from both cameras under various conditions.

Feast your eyes here:

Ricoh CX4 front Ricoh CX4 screen back Sony HX80 front Sony HX80 screen back

You’ll notice:

• Sony’s images are crisper and handle gradations smoother.
• Ricoh tends toward softer edges and warmer tones.
• Noise control favors Sony in all but the lowest ISO settings.
• At extreme zooms, Sony relies heavily on stabilization to hold sharpness but generally outperforms Ricoh.

Battery Life, Storage, and Connectivity: The Essentials You Use Daily

Ricoh CX4 lacks detailed battery life metrics but uses the DB-100 battery, which the official specs peg modest. Expect to carry spares for longer outings.

Sony HX80 offers roughly 390 shots per charge, supports SD cards plus Sony’s Memory Stick format, and offers built-in wireless connectivity including NFC for simplified sharing - handy features for travel and social sharing.

Neither supports external microphones or headphone ports, so videographers will want to look elsewhere if audio is paramount.

Video Capabilities: For The Casual Shooter or the Vlogger?

Ricoh CX4 records HD - 1280x720 at 30fps - with MJPEG codec, basic at best. No 4K, minimal manual control, and no external mic jack.

Sony HX80 steps up significantly with full HD 1080p recording at multiple frame rates (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p) in MPEG-4, AVCHD, and XAVC S codecs. No 4K or audio inputs, but the options and quality surpass Ricoh’s offerings.

Video enthusiasts with basic demands will favor Sony’s relatively richer cinema options.

Weather Sealing and Durability: Should You Take These Outside?

Neither camera offers weather sealing, dustproofing, shockproofing, or freeze-proofing. Both are compact companions meant for fair-weather adventuring rather than rugged expeditionary photography.

Scoring It Up: Overall and Genre-Specific Performance

For a quick reference, here’s an overall performance score comparison:

And a breakdown across photography types:

Sony HX80 consistently outranks Ricoh CX4 across nearly every category except perhaps close-up macro shooting and compact dimensions.

Deep Dive into Photography Genres: Which Camera Excels Where?

Portrait Photography

Sony HX80’s face detection autofocus and better image processing superiority means more natural skin tones and sharper eyes. The CX4 can manage decent portraits but lacks advanced AF and struggles with bokeh due to small sensor and slower optics.

Landscape Photography

Both cameras offer wide-angle starts (24mm Sony, 28mm Ricoh), but Sony’s higher resolution and dynamic range make for more detailed landscape captures, especially in challenging light. Neither has weather sealing, so caution is advised outdoors.

Wildlife Photography

Sony’s 720mm zoom and continuous AF track moving subjects passably well for casual wildlife shots, whereas Ricoh’s limited zoom and slower AF restricts wildlife usefulness to far less.

Sports Photography

Sony’s 10fps continuous shooting and AF tracking give it the edge for capturing fast-moving sports moments. Ricoh’s 5fps and sluggish AF limit its value here.

Street Photography

Compactness and discreteness favor Ricoh, with its lighter weight and slimmer body. However, Sony’s EVF improves composition in harsh daylight. HX80 is a bit bulkier but still very portable.

Macro Photography

Ricoh’s 1cm close-focusing ability wins hands down for great macro detail, though higher resolution on Sony bolsters sharpness at further distances.

Night & Astro Photography

Sony offers higher max ISO (12800 boosted) and better noise handling, essential for low light. Ricoh caps at ISO 3200 without RAW support or advanced noise-reduction options.

Video

Sony’s richer 1080p modes, higher frame rates, and sharper footage pull ahead clearly.

Travel Photography

Sony’s versatile zoom, battery life, wireless connectivity, and pivoting LCD make it a solid all-round travel camera. Ricoh’s slimmer footprint and lightweight nature cater to ultra-light packing priorities.

Professional Use

Neither camera is a professional workhorse. Lack of RAW (in both), limited exposure controls on Ricoh, and sensor size limit production-level potential. However, Sony’s manual modes and superior AF may support pro casual usage better.

Final Thoughts and Recommendations

Putting it all together, the Ricoh CX4 and Sony HX80 serve different audiences:

• Ricoh CX4: Ideal for casual shooters who want a lightweight, simple camera that delivers decent image quality without fuss. Perfect if you value portability above all and rarely tinker with camera settings.

• Sony HX80: Better for enthusiasts craving manual control, richer zoom range, superior autofocus, better video, and a comfortable grip for longer sessions. It’s my top recommendation for travel, wildlife, and street photographers who want a compact yet versatile tool.

If budget permits, the Sony HX80’s feature set and performance makes it the smarter buy today, offering more longevity and creative freedom despite its slightly larger size and price.

In the crowded small sensor superzoom world, each has its niche - and knowing exactly what you value helps you avoid regrets. From my experience, the HX80 strikes the best balance for most photography types, while the CX4 remains a capable pocket companion for dedicated minimalists.

Happy shooting!

Author’s Testing Methodology Notes:
My evaluation incorporated side-by-side field tests in varying light (day, dusk, indoor), real-world autofocus reaction timing with moving subjects, extended zoom edge sharpness assessments, pro lab charts for resolution check, and battery endurance with typical usage patterns. Sample images and performance ratings reflect an average of multiple test runs to account for variability.

[End of article]