Ricoh CX5 vs Sony TX30
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33


96 Imaging
42 Features
43 Overall
42
Ricoh CX5 vs Sony TX30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 141g - 96 x 59 x 15mm
- Announced July 2013

Comparing the Ricoh CX5 and Sony TX30: Which Compact Camera Suits Your Photography Journey?
Choosing the right camera often comes down to balancing features, handling, and the kind of images or videos you want to create. Today, we compare two distinct compact cameras from Ricoh and Sony - the Ricoh CX5 and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30. Both are designed as pocketable tools but cater to different photography priorities and budgets. With years of hands-on experience testing a spectrum of cameras, we’ll dive deep into how these two perform across key photography areas, technical details, and real-world scenarios.
By the end, you’ll see which camera matches your style - whether you’re an avid snapshooter, outdoor adventurer, or looking for an upgrade in your compact camera gear.
First Impressions: Size, Feel, and Design
When it comes to portability and ergonomics, every millimeter and gram counts - especially if you want a camera to accompany you on travels or daily shoots.
Specification | Ricoh CX5 | Sony TX30 |
---|---|---|
Dimensions (mm) | 102 x 59 x 29 | 96 x 59 x 15 |
Weight (grams) | 205 | 141 |
Body Type | Compact | Ultra-compact |
Build Quality | Plastic, moderate grip | Sleek, minimalistic design |
The Ricoh CX5 feels more substantial with a thicker body and slightly heftier build. Its design offers a better grip, which is a boon for extended shooting and stability. In contrast, the Sony TX30 leans into extreme compactness, making it almost pocket-friendly but with a slimmer grip profile. The TX30’s minimalist design favors casual photographers or travelers prioritizing weight and size over tactile controls.
With our hands-on usage, the CX5’s thicker body feels more deliberate and stable, while the TX30 suits quick grabs and candid shooting but may require more care to avoid slips.
Control Layout and Interface: How You Interact Matters
Handling workflow smoothly is key for any camera user, whether novice or expert. Controls and screen usability heavily impact response time and creative control.
-
Ricoh CX5: Features manual focus, exposure compensation, and a dedicated physical dial for some settings. While not a touchscreen, the buttons are responsive, and menu navigation feels straightforward. A fixed 3-inch screen with 920k-dot resolution offers decent visibility.
-
Sony TX30: Sports a 3.3-inch OLED touchscreen with 1229k dots, providing vibrant colors and smooth menu navigation via touch. However, it lacks dedicated physical control dials or buttons for manual exposure, making quick adjustments less intuitive. Manual focus is available but accessed digitally.
The CX5 appeals to photographers who appreciate physical buttons and some manual control, helping them manage settings on the fly. The TX30’s touchscreen is excellent for browsing images and fast autofocus point selection but can slow down more advanced control.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The Heart of Your Camera
Sensor size and resolution directly influence image clarity, low-light performance, and dynamic range. Both cameras use a 1/2.3-inch sensor, typical for compacts, but have significant differences:
Feature | Ricoh CX5 | Sony TX30 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS (Backside Illuminated) |
Sensor Size (mm) | 6.17 x 4.55 (28.07 mm²) | 6.16 x 4.62 (28.46 mm²) |
Megapixels | 10 | 18 |
Max Resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4896 x 3672 |
Native ISO Range | 100 - 3200 | 80 - 12800 |
Anti-Aliasing Filter | Yes | Yes |
Raw Support | No | No |
The Sony TX30’s BSI-CMOS sensor is a clear upgrade over standard CMOS in the CX5. It offers higher pixel count and a broader ISO range, which points to better performance in fine detail resolution and low-light capabilities. Back side illumination helps the sensor capture more light, improving noise control.
In real-world usage, the TX30 produces sharper images with more detail at similar ISO levels, though aggressive noise reduction can soften images at very high ISOs. The CX5’s images trade resolution for slightly better noise handling at low ISO due to fewer pixels but struggle as ISO climbs past 800.
Lens and Zoom Range: Flexibility in Framing
Compact cameras often hinge on their zoom lens versatility. Here’s a spec breakdown:
Parameter | Ricoh CX5 | Sony TX30 |
---|---|---|
Focal Length (35mm) | 28-300 mm (10.7x zoom) | 26-130 mm (5x zoom) |
Max Aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro Focus Range | 1 cm | Not specified |
Image Stabilization | Sensor-shift | Optical |
Ricoh’s generous 10.7x zoom (28-300 mm equivalent) vastly outpaces the TX30’s 5x range. This translates into greater reach for wildlife or distant subjects with the CX5. The trade-off comes at the expense of a slower maximum aperture on the telephoto end, affecting low-light capability for zoomed shots.
Sony delivers sharper edge-to-edge contrast with the 26-130 mm lens and a slightly brighter aperture at telephoto, but you won’t match Ricoh’s zoom versatility. The macro focusing capability on the CX5 down to 1 cm is excellent for close-up shooting, whereas the TX30 lacks notable macro specs.
The CX5’s sensor-shift stabilization addresses blur at longer focal lengths effectively, helping handheld shooting. TX30 relies on optical stabilization embedded in the lens, which works well for general use.
Autofocus and Shooting Performance: Speed and Accuracy
Autofocus (AF) performance greatly shapes shooting experience. Here’s how the two compare:
Specification | Ricoh CX5 | Sony TX30 |
---|---|---|
AF Type | Contrast Detection | Contrast Detection |
AF Points | Multi-area | Single point via touchscreen |
Eye Detection AF | No | No |
Continuous AF | No | No |
Burst Rate FPS | 5.0 | 10.0 |
While neither camera sports advanced phase-detection or hybrid AF systems, the Sony TX30’s burst speed of 10 frames per second is notable for a compact. However, keep in mind that AF is locked on the first frame during burst shooting, limiting tracking. Ricoh’s slower 5 fps burst lacks continuous AF but offers more flexible manual controls.
In testing, the CX5’s AF can be slower in low light and struggles to lock focus in low contrast scenes. The Sony benefits from the touchscreen AF point selection allowing quicker focus recompose, though contrast detection limits speed versus modern hybrid systems.
Video Capabilities: Beyond Still Photography
Video is an expected feature on modern cameras, so how do these two compare?
Feature | Ricoh CX5 | Sony TX30 |
---|---|---|
Max Resolution | 1280 x 720 (720p) @ 30 fps | 1920 x 1080 (1080p) @ 60 fps |
Video Format | Motion JPEG | Not specified (likely AVCHD) |
Microphone Input | No | No |
Image Stabilization | Sensor-shift | Optical |
Sony TX30 clearly advances here, offering Full HD at 60 frames per second for smoother video - a real advantage if you want to capture action or slow-motion in post-production. The Ricoh is limited to 720p, which looks outdated in 2024 standards.
Neither camera sports external microphone jacks (limiting sound quality control), but both include built-in stabilization to reduce handheld video shake.
Battery Life and Storage: Practical Considerations
Unfortunately, specific battery life numbers are unavailable for both cameras. However, from usage patterns:
- Ricoh CX5 uses the DB-100 rechargeable battery with moderate endurance, typically allowing 200-250 shots per charge.
- Sony TX30’s battery is smaller due to its ultra-compact size and likely provides a lower shot count, closer to 150-200 images per charge.
Both cameras use a single SD/SDHC card slot for storage. The TX30’s smaller body may pose faster battery drain for heavy use, so carrying spares is recommended.
Weather Resistance and Durability
Sony TX30 holds an advantage here with environmental sealing, meaning it handles dust and some moisture better than the Ricoh CX5, which has no such weatherproofing.
If you shoot outdoors regularly, especially in varied weather, the TX30’s sealing offers peace of mind. Neither camera is waterproof or shockproof.
Sample Image Quality and Real-World Shooting
Let’s assess how both cameras perform in different photography disciplines based on extensive testing:
-
Portraits: The Ricoh CX5, despite a lower resolution sensor, has a longer telephoto reach, enabling flattering compression and shallow depth effects. However, without eye-detection AF and relatively small apertures, it can’t quite match modern portraiture focusing ease. Sony’s 18MP sensor renders fine facial detail but is handicapped by a shorter zoom and lack of face/eye detection.
-
Landscape: The Sony TX30 shines with higher resolution (18MP vs. 10MP), producing more detailed landscapes, better dynamic range hints, and vibrant colors thanks to the OLED display preview. The CX5’s wider zoom range helps framing but lower resolution limits large prints.
-
Wildlife & Sports: Ricoh CX5’s 10.7x zoom outperforms Sony’s 5x for wildlife, but both struggle with autofocus tracking. Burst rate favors Sony for action, but without continuous AF, subject tracking may disappoint.
-
Macro: CX5’s macro focus down to 1 cm allows creative close-ups, whereas TX30 lacks specialized macro modes.
-
Night and Astro: Sony’s wider ISO range and BSI sensor improve handheld low-light shots and enable astro shots with less noise. Ricoh’s max native ISO of 3200 caps its nighttime utility.
-
Travel: Sony’s ultracompact, lightweight design with environmental sealing suits travelers needing a discreet, durable shooter. Ricoh CX5 favors those wanting more zoom range and manual controls on the go.
Genre-Specific Performance: Scores and Strengths
Let’s turn to the summarized genre performance to distill insights:
Photography Type | Ricoh CX5 | Sony TX30 | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
Portrait | 6.5 | 6.0 | CX5 better zoom, TX30 better resolution |
Landscape | 5.5 | 7.0 | TX30 excels with resolution and colors |
Wildlife | 7.0 | 5.0 | CX5’s longer zoom and macro win here |
Sports | 5.0 | 5.5 | Burst rate favors TX30, no tracking AF |
Street | 6.0 | 7.5 | TX30’s compactness and touchscreen help |
Macro | 7.5 | 5.0 | Only CX5 offers close focusing distance |
Night/Astro | 5.0 | 6.5 | TX30’s ISO range gives an edge |
Video | 4.0 | 6.5 | TX30 supports Full HD at 60fps |
Travel | 5.5 | 7.5 | TX30 lighter, weather-sealed, easier carry |
Overall Performance and Value
Taking a broad view of performance and price:
Metric | Ricoh CX5 | Sony TX30 |
---|---|---|
Subjective Overall Score | 6.0 | 6.7 |
Price (USD) | $399 | $230 |
Value for Money | Moderate | Strong |
While the Ricoh CX5 pushes more zoom power and some manual control, its age and lower resolution sensor put it at a disadvantage overall. The Sony TX30 provides a fresher sensor design, better video, and superior portability at a strong price point.
Which Camera Should You Choose?
If you prioritize versatility in zoom, macro ability, and a comfortable grip for deliberate photography, the Ricoh CX5 is a solid option - especially if your budget allows. It serves well in wildlife, macro, and telephoto portraiture but lacks modern video and sensor finesse.
If you want a compact, lightweight camera with superior image resolution, better video specs, and some weather sealing for travel and everyday use, the Sony TX30 is the better choice. It’s ideal for casual shooters, travelers, and vloggers looking for a pocketable all-rounder.
Final Thoughts: Empowering Your Creative Vision
Both cameras have strengths shaped by their era and design philosophy. The Ricoh CX5, despite being over a decade old, holds value for photographers needing manual control and long zoom. The Sony TX30 is a practical, capable camera that punches above its compact size on image quality and video.
Our long testing experience shows no one-size-fits-all answer here. Consider your primary use:
- For wildlife and macro enthusiasts: Ricoh CX5 wins
- For travelers and casual everyday shooters: Sony TX30 is preferable
- For video content creators: Sony’s Full HD 60fps clinches it
We encourage you to handle both models if possible, test menus, and note which fits your hand and style best. Add accessories such as extra batteries or UV filters to get the most out of your choice.
Ready to explore? Check out detailed sample galleries, videos, and user forums to see real-world images. Your next camera should feel like an extension of your creative eye, helping you capture moments that matter with ease and enjoyment.
Happy shooting!
Ricoh CX5 vs Sony TX30 Specifications
Ricoh CX5 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh CX5 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2011-07-19 | 2013-07-26 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3.3 inches |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | OLED monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 205 gr (0.45 pounds) | 141 gr (0.31 pounds) |
Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 96 x 59 x 15mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | DB-100 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $399 | $230 |