Ricoh G900 vs Samsung GX-10
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
59 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung GX-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Launched February 2018
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Launched September 2006
- Updated by Samsung GX-20
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung GX-10 Overview
In this article, we are comparing the Ricoh G900 vs Samsung GX-10, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced DSLR by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the G900 (20MP) and GX-10 (10MP) and the G900 (1/2.3") and GX-10 (APS-C) use totally different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe G900 was manufactured 11 years later than the GX-10 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh G900 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving straight into a complete comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the G900 scores against the GX-10 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung GX-10 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh G900 & Samsung GX-10. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh G900 Gallery & Samsung GX-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Samsung GX-10
G900 | GX-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2018 | September 2006 | More recent by 140 months | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 210k | Clearer display (+830k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-10 over the Ricoh G900
GX-10 | G900 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh G900 and Samsung GX-10
G900 | GX-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither includes Touch display |
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung GX-10 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Ricoh G900 features outer dimensions of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Samsung GX-10 has proportions of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") along with a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh G900 vs Samsung GX-10 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the G900 compared to the GX-10.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the G900 and GX-10 is 89 and 59 respectively.
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung GX-10 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to visualise the gap in sensor measurements merely by seeing specifications. The photograph below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the G900 and GX-10.
Plainly, each of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The G900 featuring a smaller sensor will make achieving shallower DOF harder and the Ricoh G900 will show more detail due to its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The fresher G900 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh G900 vs Samsung GX-10 Specifications
Ricoh G900 | Samsung GX-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh G900 | Samsung GX-10 |
Class | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2018-02-21 | 2006-09-21 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3872 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 151 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 210 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) | - |
Flash modes | Flash on, flash off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840x2160 | - |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Supports FlashAir SD cards | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 247 gr (0.54 lb) | 793 gr (1.75 lb) |
Dimensions | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $752 | $850 |