Clicky

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB30F

Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34
Ricoh GR Digital III front
 
Samsung WB30F front
Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
33
Overall
36

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs

Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
  • Revealed July 2009
  • Newer Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
Samsung WB30F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
  • Released January 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB30F Overview

Its time to take a closer look at the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB30F, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the GR Digital III (10MP) and WB30F (16MP) and the GR Digital III (1/1.7") and WB30F (1/2.3") provide different sensor size.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The GR Digital III was released 4 years earlier than the WB30F which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise overview of how the GR Digital III grades versus the WB30F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Samsung WB30F

 GR Digital III WB30F 
Manually focus More exact focusing
Display resolution920k230kSharper display (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Ricoh GR Digital III

 WB30F GR Digital III 
ReleasedJanuary 2013July 2009Newer by 42 months

Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung WB30F

 GR Digital III WB30F 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display size
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lack of Touch friendly display

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR Digital III comes with outer measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs) while the Samsung WB30F has proportions of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).

Take a look at the Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB30F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the GR Digital III vs the WB30F.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB30F size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital III and WB30F is 92 and 96 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB30F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its hard to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions only by reading through a spec sheet. The pic here may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the GR Digital III and WB30F.

As you can see, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The GR Digital III because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Samsung WB30F will give extra detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital III is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB30F sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB30F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Ricoh GR Digital III
Portrait photography with Samsung WB30F
40
has manual focus
supports RAW formats
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
34
decent megapixels (16MP)
includes face detect focusing
no manual focus
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh GR Digital III
Street photography with Samsung WB30F
55
supports RAW formats
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
63
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (128g)
no moving screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III Sports photography information
Samsung WB30F Sports photography information
17
can't change focal length (28mm)
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (10MP)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
lack of phase detect AF
44
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital III as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB30F as a Travel photography camera
63
built-in flash
very good maximum aperture (f1.9)
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
69
lighter than competitors (128g)
decent megapixels (16MP)
built-in flash
really wide (24mm)
no Time Lapse recording
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Ricoh GR Digital III
Landscape photography with Samsung WB30F
45
has manual focus
very good maximum aperture (f1.9)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
supports RAW formats
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (10MP)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
43
really wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16MP)
no manual focus
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
manual exposure not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
no Time Lapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Ricoh GR Digital III
Vlogging with Samsung WB30F
25
very good maximum aperture (f1.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have microphone port
33
really wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect focusing
lighter than competitors (128 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
no mic support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Samsung WB30F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR Digital III and Samsung WB30F
 Ricoh GR Digital IIISamsung WB30F
General Information
Brand Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GR Digital III Samsung WB30F
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2009-07-27 2013-01-07
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip GR engine III -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 -
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 64 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28mm (1x) 24-240mm (10.0x)
Maximum aperture f/1.9 f/3.1-6.3
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 920k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen technology - QVGA TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 1 seconds 8 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.00 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual -
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format - MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 208 gr (0.46 lb) 128 gr (0.28 lb)
Physical dimensions 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Price at launch $399 $180