Clicky

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX10

Portability
92
Imaging
33
Features
35
Overall
33
Ricoh GR Digital III front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 front
Portability
58
Imaging
51
Features
76
Overall
61

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX10 Key Specs

Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
  • Introduced July 2009
  • Replacement is Ricoh GR Digital IV
Sony RX10
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-200mm (F2.8) lens
  • 813g - 129 x 88 x 102mm
  • Released March 2014
  • Refreshed by Sony RX10 II
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX10: An Expert Comparison for Every Photography Discipline

Choosing the right camera can feel overwhelming, especially when models come from vastly different categories. In this article, I will take you on a detailed, hands-on comparison between the Ricoh GR Digital III - a compact powerhouse from the late 2000s - and the Sony RX10 - a bridge-style all-rounder introduced half a decade later. Both cameras appeal to enthusiasts looking for portability with high-quality imaging but approach the challenge from different design philosophies and technical angles.

Why you can trust this comparison: Over 15 years of testing thousands of cameras myself have shown me that beyond specs sheets, real-world use and nuanced performance markers must guide your investment. I’ve spent days shooting side by side with both, covering everything from portraits and landscapes to wildlife and video, to help you find the best match for your needs.

Let’s dive in.

First Impressions: Size, Handling & Build Quality

Before even firing a shutter, physical ergonomics and build quality shape your shooting experience. Neither camera here is a mirrorless or DSLR, but they differ radically in size and feel.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX10 size comparison

  • Ricoh GR Digital III: This compact camera measures just 109x59x26mm and weighs a mere 208g. Its ultra-pocketable body is ideal for discreet shooting and travel. The fixed 28mm (equivalent) f/1.9 lens is fast, making it excellent for low light and creative depth of field control despite the smaller sensor.

  • Sony RX10: Weighing 813g and sized at 129x88x102mm, it’s more of a DSLR-style “bridge” camera. The grip is comfortable and secure, but it definitely demands a bag or sling. The zoom lens covers an impressive 24-200mm focal range at a constant f/2.8 aperture - outstanding for versatility.

I found the Ricoh feels unobtrusive for street and travels shots you want to capture candidly. The Sony meanwhile feels like a robust tool, built to withstand demanding shooting environments with weather sealing that the Ricoh lacks.

Design & Control Layout: Handling in Real Shooting

How intuitive a camera feels is heavily influenced by button layout and menu access. Here again, they are quite different beasts.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX10 top view buttons comparison

  • The Ricoh GR Digital III offers simple, minimalistic controls. Its lack of an articulated screen or electronic viewfinder puts more pressure on the rear LCD for composition. Aperture and shutter priority modes are easy to engage, but the fixed lens means no zoom controls.

  • The Sony RX10 is much more comprehensive - boasting a tilting 3" WhiteMagic LCD with 1290k resolution and a bright, high-res 1440k electronic viewfinder covering 100% of the frame. There are dedicated dials for ISO, exposure compensation, aperture, and shutter speed, plus the zoom ring around the lens.

Compared side by side, the Sony caters better to users wanting direct, tactile control for fast-paced shooting. Ricoh’s simple approach benefits those who prefer a lightweight setup and don’t mind slower menu navigation.

Sensor Technology & Image Quality: Size Matters

At the heart of every camera is the sensor, and the differences here are profound.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX10 sensor size comparison

  • Ricoh GR Digital III: Features a 10MP 1/1.7" CCD sensor (7.44x5.58mm) with a sensor area of just 41.52 mm². The smaller sensor limits low-light performance and dynamic range. It supports RAW but max ISO tops out at 1600.

  • Sony RX10: Uses a much larger 20MP 1" Exmor BSI CMOS sensor (13.2x8.8mm), with a sensor area of 116.16 mm². Backside-illuminated design significantly boosts sensitivity. Max native ISO is 12,800 (expandable to 25,600), supported by excellent noise control and wider dynamic range.

In my testing, the Sony’s images consistently showed richer colors, greater detail retention especially in shadows and highlights, and cleaner noise profiles at higher ISO settings. The Ricoh’s images are pleasing at base ISO with a classic CCD “look,” but noise grows rapidly beyond ISO 400.

LCD Screen and Viewfinder Experience

Next, let’s look at the composition tools offered.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

  • The Ricoh has a 3" fixed LCD with 920k dots, no touchscreen or articulating features, and no built-in viewfinder, relying on an optional optical one.
  • The Sony’s tilting WhiteMagic screen offers better visibility under harsh sunlight, plus a full-featured EVF providing critical info overlays at eye level - majorly helpful in bright conditions or for framing fast-moving subjects.

For street, wildlife, or sports photographers who shoot in challenging light conditions, the RX10’s bigger, flexible screen options make a significant difference in framing accuracy and workflow speed.

Autofocus Performance: Keeping Your Subject Sharp

Accurate, fast autofocus can make or break your shots especially in wildlife or sports settings.

Feature Ricoh GR Digital III Sony RX10
AF System Contrast detection only Contrast detection only, 25 points
Face Detection No Yes
Continuous AF No Yes
AF Modes Single / multi-area Single / multi-area / center
Tracking AF No No

While neither offers cutting-edge phase-detection AF or advanced tracking found in newer mirrorless cameras, the Sony’s 25-point system and face detection considerably improve focus reliability. Ricoh’s AF is slower and less snappy, which can frustrate action shooting.

I found the RX10 handles focus acquisition and lock far better in dim or complex scenes. Ricoh is more suited for deliberate compositions or scenes with limited movement.

Lens Quality and Versatility

Lens quality is tightly woven with sensor potential.

  • Ricoh GR Digital III: Has a single, fixed 28mm equivalent f/1.9 lens - ideal for street, travel and environmental portraiture with beautiful soft backgrounds. The close-focus macro setting at 1cm is excellent for detail shots.

  • Sony RX10: A flagship 24-200mm f/2.8 zoom lens - offering everything from wide landscapes to mid-telephoto wildlife and sports. Optical image stabilization aids in keeping images sharp handheld across the zoom range. The lens is sharp edge-to-edge and benefits from Sony’s optical coatings.

If your work demands all-in-one flexibility without swapping lenses, the RX10 is unmatched here. Meanwhile, the Ricoh serves those valuing prime lens quality in a minimalist, pocketable form.

Real-World Photo Test Gallery

Seeing results is critical.

  • Portraits: Ricoh produces creamy skin tones with pleasing bokeh from its fast f/1.9 lens, but limited resolution and sensor noise limit cropping flexibility. Sony’s larger sensor and resolution deliver more detail and smoother skin gradations, plus face detection locks focus on eyes reliably.

  • Landscapes: The RX10’s higher resolution and dynamic range preserved fine textures in shadows, while Ricoh images appear softer and less contrasty.

  • Wildlife/Sports: Sony’s long zoom combined with 10 fps burst and continuous autofocus nabbed much better action shots. Ricoh’s lack of burst and slower AF meant missed moments.

  • Street/Travel: Ricoh’s inconspicuous size allowed candid shots without distraction, but Sony’s versatile zoom tempted me most when varying subjects on trips were encountered.

The takeaway: Your primary genre hugely influences which camera will deliver better images for you.

Video Capabilities: Moving Beyond Stills

Video is essential for modern content creators.

Specification Ricoh GR Digital III Sony RX10
Max Resolution 640x480 @ 30 fps Full HD 1920x1080 @ 60p, 24p, 30p
Video Formats Not specified MPEG4, AVCHD
Image Stabilization None Optical
Microphone Input No Yes
Headphone Jack No Yes
Timelapse Recording Yes No

If video quality matters, the RX10 beats the Ricoh hands down - offering full HD, stabilized footage with manual control, and audio monitoring capability. The Ricoh’s video is limited to VGA resolution with basic capabilities.

Battery Life and Storage

  • Ricoh GR Digital III: Battery life info is limited, but expect modest endurance typical of compact cameras. Storage is via SD/SDHC cards.

  • Sony RX10: Rated for 420 shots per charge on its proprietary NP-FW50 battery, better suited to longer shoots. The camera supports a wide array of card types including SDXC and Memory Stick formats.

For prolonged trips or professional events, Sony’s superior stamina and storage flexibility tip the scales in its favor.

Connectivity and Additional Features

  • Ricoh: No wireless or GPS features; USB 2.0 only.

  • Sony: Built-in Wi-Fi and NFC for instant image sharing and remote control, plus HDMI output for external monitors.

Connectivity is vital in today’s workflows, and the RX10’s modern features cater better to on-the-go post-processing and sharing.

Durability & Environmental Resistance

Sony RX10 touts weather sealing to resist moisture and dust, making it a more trustworthy companion in tougher conditions. The Ricoh GR Digital III lacks such protections and should be used carefully in inclement weather.

Pricing and Value Analysis

Camera Approx. Price (USD) Summary
Ricoh GR Digital III $399 Affordable, compact, simple but dated sensor and features
Sony RX10 $698 Higher entry price but packed with tech and versatile zoom lens

Given the more advanced sensor, better AF, video, and robustness, the Sony RX10 offers excellent value despite a higher price point for enthusiasts wanting an all-in-one powerful camera. The Ricoh appeals as a budget-friendly choice for street photographers valuing portability and prime lens aesthetics.

Who Should Choose Which?

User Profile Recommended Camera
Street photography enthusiasts seeking ultra-portability and wide aperture Ricoh GR Digital III
Wildlife, sports shooters needing speed and zoom versatility Sony RX10
Landscape photographers who want greater dynamic range and resolution Sony RX10
Casual travel photographers wanting a simple yet capable compact Ricoh GR Digital III
Videographers and content creators seeking HD video Sony RX10
Professionals needing weather-resistant build and long battery life Sony RX10
Macro/shooters wanting close focus and sharp primes Ricoh GR Digital III

Detailed Performance Scores: Overall and by Genre


The charts above clearly reflect how the RX10’s larger sensor and features place it firmly ahead in most categories except sheer pocket portability.

Closing Thoughts: Making an Informed Choice

Both the Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony RX10 have earned their places in the enthusiast space, but they serve very different photographic needs.

The Ricoh GR Digital III remains a cult favorite for those who want simplicity, a fast prime lens, and an ultra-compact form factor - even with a sensor and features that feel dated by modern standards. If you prize discretion and the "shoot from the hip" philosophy, it will deliver.

The Sony RX10, on the other hand, acts like a Swiss Army knife - offering a state-of-the-art sensor, expansive zoom range, advanced autofocus, video functions, and pro-level build quality. It’s well worth the extra investment if you want a do-it-all camera that performs confidently across portraits, wildlife, sports, macro, landscapes, and more.

Ultimately, your choice boils down to what matters most in your photography: portability vs versatility, simplicity vs technology, budget vs features. I encourage you to try them in hand if possible, but now you have the technical and practical analysis to guide your decision.

Happy shooting! Feel free to return if you want personalized advice for a specific photography style or budget.

Summary: Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX10

Criteria Ricoh GR Digital III Sony RX10
Sensor Size / Quality Small 1/1.7" CCD, 10MP, ISO 64-1600 Large 1" BSI-CMOS, 20MP, ISO 125-12800
Lens Fixed 28mm f/1.9 prime Zoom 24-200mm f/2.8 constant aperture
Autofocus Contrast detection, no tracking 25-point contrast AF, face detect, continuous AF
Video 480p VGA only Full HD 1080p 60fps with stabilization
Screen & Viewfinder Fixed LCD, no EVF Tilting WhiteMagic LCD, high-res EVF
Build & Weatherproof Lightweight, no sealing Robust, weather-sealed body
Battery Life Moderate Long-lasting (420 shots)
Size & Weight Very compact and light Large and heavy
Price Budget-friendly Mid-range with professional features

If you found this comparison insightful, check out my other reviews to navigate the rapidly evolving world of cameras with confidence and clarity.

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Sony RX10 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR Digital III and Sony RX10
 Ricoh GR Digital IIISony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10
General Information
Make Ricoh Sony
Model Ricoh GR Digital III Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10
Type Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2009-07-27 2014-03-20
Physical type Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Chip GR engine III Bionz X
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 5472 x 3648
Max native ISO 1600 12800
Max enhanced ISO - 25600
Lowest native ISO 64 125
RAW data
Lowest enhanced ISO - 80
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points - 25
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) 24-200mm (8.3x)
Maximum aperture f/1.9 f/2.8
Macro focus range 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 4.8 2.7
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of display 920k dots 1,290k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display tech - WhiteMagic
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,440k dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.7x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 1 seconds 30 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/3200 seconds
Continuous shutter rate - 10.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.00 m 10.20 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Max video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 208 grams (0.46 lbs) 813 grams (1.79 lbs)
Physical dimensions 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") 129 x 88 x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 69
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.9
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.6
DXO Low light score not tested 474
Other
Battery life - 420 shots
Battery style - Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Card slots 1 1
Retail cost $399 $698