Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Ricoh WG-4
92 Imaging
34 Features
47 Overall
39


90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2011
- Superseded the Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Ricoh WG-4: Expert Comparison for Every Photography Journey
Choosing the right camera for your specific photography goals is critical. Ricoh offers two distinct compact cameras aimed at different use cases: the Ricoh GR Digital IV, a classic small-sensor compact built for image quality and street readiness, and the Ricoh WG-4, a rugged, waterproof camera designed to endure and excel in extreme conditions. Both are compact cameras, but they serve notably different photographer profiles. Together, we’ll systematically dissect each to help you make an informed choice grounded in real-world performance and technical insight.
Here you see the physical size difference: GR Digital IV is slightly shorter and narrower for better pocketability; WG-4 trades compactness for durability and grip size.
Understanding the Build and Handling: Size, Design, and Ergonomics
Before diving into specs, feel the camera in your hands is vital. The Ricoh GR Digital IV features a minimalist, refined compact body measuring 109×59×33 mm and weighing about 190 grams. This makes it extremely pocketable and perfect when discretion and lightness are priorities - for example, street and travel photography.
In contrast, the Ricoh WG-4 measures 124×64×33 mm and weighs 230 grams. Although slightly bulkier, this camera is toughened with full weather sealing and impact resistance - ideal for adventure, outdoor, and underwater use where the elements challenge your gear.
Key ergonomics and design features:
Feature | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Ricoh WG-4 |
---|---|---|
Dimensions (mm) | 109 × 59 × 33 | 124 × 64 × 33 |
Weight | 190 g | 230 g |
Weather sealing | None | Waterproof, shockproof, freezeproof, crushproof |
Viewfinder | Optional optical (not included) | None |
Controls | Classic compact with manual modes | Ruggedized buttons for easy use with gloves |
The GR Digital IV leans into pure photography ergonomics with a tight layout and a focus on manual control, while the WG-4’s buttons are larger and spaced for gloved hands - making it suited for harsh conditions but less refined for extended street shooting sessions.
Notice the control layouts: GR Digital IV emphasizes manual dials and compactness; WG-4 prioritizes rugged button accessibility.
Sensor and Image Quality: CCD vs BSI-CMOS in Real-Life Use
At the heart of image quality lies the sensor. The GR Digital IV is equipped with a 1/1.7-inch CCD sensor measuring 7.44×5.58 mm (approximately 41.5 mm²) and 10 megapixels. The WG-4 features a 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS sensor with 16 megapixels (6.17×4.55 mm, or roughly 28 mm²).
The CCD sensor’s larger photosites tend to offer better color depth and smoother gradations despite lower resolution. The WG-4’s BSI-CMOS favors higher resolution at smaller sensor size.
What this means practically:
-
Ricoh GR Digital IV (CCD):
- Larger sensor area provides better dynamic range, especially in mid to low ISO ranges.
- CCD sensors excel at smooth, natural skin tones - perfect for portraits.
- 10 MP resolution keeps files manageable but still sharp for most printing and web use.
- Native ISO range 80 - 3200, with usable images up to ISO 800 in daylight conditions.
- Raw support enables professional post-processing flexibility.
-
Ricoh WG-4 (BSI-CMOS):
- Smaller sensor with higher pixel count delivers higher resolution images (16 MP), beneficial for landscapes and cropping.
- BSI-CMOS technology improves low-light sensitivity, but noise control is camera-dependent.
- ISO range starts at 125 up to 6400, theoretically better for shooting in darker environments or fast action.
- No raw support limits post-processing, which impacts professional workflows.
In our extensive side-by-side testing, the GR Digital IV produces notably richer colors and less noise in controlled lighting and portraits due to CCD’s inherent characteristics. The WG-4, however, achieves punchier images in bright outdoor scenes and provides better detail flexibility for landscapes with more megapixels, but noise artifacts start to appear above ISO 800.
Lens and Focusing: Bright Prime vs Versatile Zoom
Ricoh GR Digital IV Lens:
- Focal length: Fixed 28mm equivalent, perfect for street, documentary, and environmental portraits.
- Max aperture: F1.9 (bright for a compact), allowing shallow depth-of-field for creamy bokeh.
- Macro: Focus down to 1 cm, great for close-up details.
- Autofocus: Contrast detection only, single-shot autofocus, no face or eye detection.
This combination suits photographers who want fast, sharp primes with manual focus options and the ability to isolate subjects against blur. The 28mm wide-angle focal length is classic for photojournalism.
Ricoh WG-4 Lens:
- Focal length: 25-100mm (4x zoom), delivering wide to medium telephoto versatility.
- Max aperture: F2.0-4.9, starting moderately fast wide, but slowing at 100mm.
- Macro: Also focuses at 1 cm.
- Autofocus: Contrast AF with 9-point system, face detection, continuous AF, and tracking.
WG-4’s zoom offers flexible framing for adventure, wildlife, and travel photography where distance varies. Autofocus tracking and face detection add practical benefits for moving subjects, although contrast AF’s speed lags behind modern hybrid or phase-detection systems.
Display and Interface: LCD Quality and User Interaction
Both models employ fixed 3-inch LCD screens but with different resolutions and qualities.
The GR Digital IV boasts 1230k dots offering crisp preview and menus, whereas the WG-4’s 460k dot screen is low-res and less detailed outdoors.
-
Ricoh GR Digital IV:
- Bright, detailed LCD with good visibility.
- Straightforward menu and control system emphasizing manual modes.
- No touchscreen.
-
Ricoh WG-4:
- Lower resolution TFT LCD; useful but less sharp.
- Interface optimized for outdoors with large icons.
- No touchscreen.
The GR Digital IV’s screen serves photographers needing accurate exposure and focusing confirmation, especially in studio or street settings. The WG-4’s screen is functional but optimized for rugged environments rather than pixel-level scrutiny.
Performance for Photography Disciplines: From Portraits to Wildlife and More
We’ve tested these cameras across numerous genres - here’s how they stack up in practice:
Photography Type | Ricoh GR Digital IV Strengths | Ricoh WG-4 Strengths | Practical Takeaway |
---|---|---|---|
Portrait | Excellent skin tone color; bright f1.9 lens; sharp detail | Limited by zoom’s max aperture and noise | Pick GR for portraits, especially in controlled light |
Landscape | Great dynamic range, sharp prime | Higher resolution for cropping; rugged for outdoors | WG-4 wins for rugged landscape adventures; GR for image quality |
Wildlife | Limited by fixed wide lens, slow AF | 4x zoom, AF tracking help capture wildlife | WG-4 better at casual wildlife shots |
Sports | No continuous AF or burst shooting | 2 fps burst, continuous AF, face detection | WG-4 modest practicality for sports |
Street | Compact size, quiet shutter, manual control | Bulkier but rugged | GR Digital IV is better street companion |
Macro | Excellent close focusing | Similar close-up range | Both good, GR’s f1.9 aids background blur |
Night/Astro | CCD sensor yields cleaner mid-ISO images | Higher ISO, but noisier and no raw | GR Digital IV slightly better for low light |
Video | VGA at 30fps (Motion JPEG) | Full HD 1080p at 30fps (H.264) | WG-4 vastly superior video capabilities |
Travel | Ultra-portable, good battery life | Rugged and versatile zoom | WG-4 for adventurers; GR for urban/travelers sensitive to size |
Professional | Raw shooting, manual exposure | No raw, simpler control | GR Digital IV better for professionals |
Left: Ricoh GR Digital IV sample portrait showing smooth skin tones and creamy bokeh; Right: Ricoh WG-4 landscape with good detail and vibrant colors
Autofocus and Exposure: Technical Insights
-
GR Digital IV’s AF system relies on contrast detection with multi-area or center weighting but no face or subject tracking. Focus speed is moderate and best suited for static subjects or deliberate manual focus.
-
WG-4’s system includes 9 AF points, face detection, continuous AF, and subject tracking, making it significantly better for action or unpredictable subjects despite both being contrast detection.
Exposure modes:
-
GR Digital IV offers shutter priority, aperture priority, and full manual exposure - ideal for photographers who want creative control.
-
WG-4 provides shutter priority but lacks aperture priority and manual mode, a concession to ease of use in rough conditions.
Bracketing is only available on WG-4 for auto exposure and white balance - a handy feature for HDR attempts in landscapes.
Battery Life, Storage, and Connectivity
In field use, battery life and convenience matters.
Feature | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Ricoh WG-4 |
---|---|---|
Battery life (CIPA) | ~390 shots | ~240 shots |
Battery model | DB-65 | D-LI92 |
Storage type | SD/SDHC + internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC + internal |
USB | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
HDMI output | Yes | Yes |
Wireless | None | None |
GPS | No | No |
GR Digital IV’s better battery endurance makes it practical for longer days of shooting without heavy recharging logistics.
The GR Digital IV scores higher on image quality and ergonomics; WG-4 excels in ruggedness and video capabilities.
Decoding Value: Pricing and Purchase Considerations
At launch, the GR Digital IV was priced around $599, reflecting its premium image quality and compact design ethos. The WG-4 entered the market at $329, an excellent price point for a rugged, versatile camera with video strengths.
If budget is a consideration, the WG-4 offers tremendous value for outdoor enthusiasts. However, the GR Digital IV remains a better investment for photographers prioritizing image quality and manual control.
The GR Digital IV dominates in portrait, street, and night photography, while the WG-4 shines in rugged travel and video.
Recommendations: Which Ricoh Model Fits Your Photography Style?
Let’s break this down clearly:
If You Should Choose Ricoh GR Digital IV
- You want exceptional color fidelity, smooth skin tones, and natural bokeh for portraits.
- You shoot predominantly in urban, street, or controlled lighting situations where a fast prime shines.
- Manual exposure controls and RAW shooting are important.
- Portability and discretion for travel or street.
- You value an easy-to-read screen and extended battery life.
- You require better low-light still image quality.
- Price is less constrained and you want a pure photographer’s compact.
If You Should Choose Ricoh WG-4
- You need a tough, waterproof, shockproof camera that won’t fail outdoors or underwater.
- You want versatile focal lengths, including telephoto reach for casual wildlife or family snaps.
- Continuous autofocus, face detection, and video quality matter.
- Exposure bracketing and rugged handling are priorities.
- You shoot adventure, hiking, snorkeling, or need a secondary travel camera that can capture both stills and HD video.
- Budget is tighter but you want wide functionality.
Final Thoughts and Getting Started
Both the Ricoh GR Digital IV and WG-4 have distinct strengths shaped by their design focus: pure image quality and compact refinement versus rugged versatility and video capability. Our extensive hands-on testing confirms that:
- The GR Digital IV is a compact powerhouse for photographers who demand fine still image quality, pleasing color science, and a tactile experience rooted in manual control.
- The WG-4 serves passionate outdoorsmen and casual shooters who want a weatherproof camera that can handle family adventures without worry, while still offering 1080p video and flexible zoom.
If you are new or experienced, consider your shooting habits and environments carefully. Both cameras invite an exciting creative journey, so check them out in person if possible. Pair with appropriate accessories - protective cases for travel, filters for landscape, or spare batteries for all-day shoots - to maximize your experience.
Step forward into your next photo adventure confident in your choice - you’re investing not just in a device, but in your visual storytelling.
We hope this deep dive has clarified key differences through expert review and practical analysis. Happy shooting, and may your images inspire!
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Ricoh WG-4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Ricoh |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Ricoh WG-4 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2011-09-15 | 2014-02-05 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 190g (0.42 lbs) | 230g (0.51 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 shots | 240 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB65 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $599 | $330 |