Ricoh GR II vs Sony A3000
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
69 Imaging
63 Features
54 Overall
59
Ricoh GR II vs Sony A3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Revealed June 2015
- Previous Model is Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 411g - 128 x 91 x 85mm
- Introduced August 2013
- Renewed by Sony a3500
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh GR II vs Sony A3000 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Ricoh GR II and Sony A3000, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. The image resolution of the GR II (16MP) and the A3000 (20MP) is very comparable and they feature the exact same sensor sizes (APS-C).
Photography GlossaryThe GR II was manufactured 22 months after the A3000 making the cameras a generation away from each other. The two cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony A3000 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the GR II matches up versus the A3000 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh GR II vs Sony A3000 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR II & Sony Alpha A3000. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR II Gallery & Sony A3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Sony A3000
| GR II | A3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2015 |  | August 2013 | Newer by 22 months |
| Display resolution | 1230k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+1000k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A3000 over the Ricoh GR II
| A3000 | GR II |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR II and Sony A3000
| GR II | A3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GR II vs Sony A3000 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh GR II comes with exterior dimensions of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") having a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs) while the Sony A3000 has specifications of 128mm x 91mm x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") with a weight of 411 grams (0.91 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GR II and Sony A3000 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have during that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the GR II and the A3000.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the GR II and A3000 is 89 and 69 respectively.
Ricoh GR II vs Sony A3000 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions simply by going through a spec sheet. The pic underneath may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR II and A3000.
As you can see, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You can expect to see the Sony A3000 to show extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos much more aggressively. The more modern GR II provides an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR II vs Sony A3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Ricoh GR II vs Sony A3000 Specifications
| Ricoh GR II | Sony Alpha A3000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model | Ricoh GR II | Sony Alpha A3000 |
| Category | Large Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2015-06-17 | 2013-08-27 |
| Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | GR Engine V | BIONZ image |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 372.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 5456 x 3632 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 16000 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-16.0 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 121 |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 1,230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.47x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 300 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 6.00 m (at ISO200 / 4m at ISO100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless | Flash off, Auto flash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync. |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | - | 1/160 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD, H.264, MP4 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 251 gr (0.55 lbs) | 411 gr (0.91 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 128 x 91 x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 80 | 78 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 23.6 | 23.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 13.7 | 12.8 |
| DXO Low light score | 1078 | 1068 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 photographs | 470 photographs |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | DB-65 | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2-sec. or 10-sec. delay) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $599 | $398 |