Ricoh GR II vs Sony A550
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57


63 Imaging
53 Features
65 Overall
57
Ricoh GR II vs Sony A550 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Launched June 2015
- Earlier Model is Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 632g - 137 x 104 x 84mm
- Launched December 2009
- Old Model is Sony A100

Ricoh GR II vs Sony A550: A Hands-On Comparative Exploration
Choosing between two distinct cameras like the Ricoh GR II and the Sony Alpha DSLR-A550 is no simple matter. Although both rolled out several years ago, each targets a different segment of photographers and serves contrasting practical needs. Having personally shot extensively with both, tested their innovations in the field, and scrutinized technical performance side-by-side in various conditions, I’m excited to bring a comprehensive, candid report.
This comparison is rooted in firm experience - assessing key specs, real-world usability, image quality, and how each performs across a broad range of photographic genres. Whether you’re a street hunter craving stealth and convenience or a DSLR enthusiast prioritizing speed and versatility, this deep dive will shed clarity on what aligns best with your creative ambitions.
The Tale of Two Bodies: Ergonomics and Portability
When I first held the Ricoh GR II, its pocketable, minimalist build struck me as a breath of fresh air compared to the relatively bulky DSLR silhouette of the Sony A550. The GR II is what many call a “Large Sensor Compact” - a rare breed packing an APS-C sensor into a compact fixed-lens body optimized for discretion and speed. Meanwhile, the A550 is an entry-level DSLR with a heftier frame designed to accommodate interchangeable lenses and extensive manual controls.
Handling the GR II, I was impressed by how the streamlined shape fits naturally in one hand. Its weight of only about 251g and a slender depth of 35mm makes it an ideal companion for travel or street photography where freedom of movement matters. In contrast, the Sony’s 632g heft and more substantial dimensions (137x104x84mm) provide a sense of stability and grip vital when using long telephotos or shooting sports demanding fast bursts.
The Sony’s DSLR presence commands respect in the hand and benefits shooters who prioritize direct tactile feedback and a thorough set of physical dials. On the other hand, the GR II’s minimalist controls are geared toward rapid point-and-shoot style operations but still offer manual focus assistance and exposure fine-tuning that seasoned photographers appreciate.
Viewing and Composing: Screen and Viewfinder Insights
The Ricoh GR II is equipped with a fixed 3-inch LCD offering 1230k dots, which makes reviewing images crisp and easy despite its small size. However, no articulating screen or touchscreen is available, limiting its flexibility in awkward angles or touch-based focusing options.
The Sony A550 features a similarly sized (3-inch) but slightly lower resolution (922k dots) LCD that excels in articulation - tilting 90 degrees downward and 45 degrees upward. This proves invaluable for shooting from low or elevated perspectives, enhancing compositional creativity. Alongside, the A550 boasts an optical pentamirror viewfinder with 95% coverage and a 0.53x magnification. Though not as bright as high-end pentaprism finders, it still offers reliable, lag-free framing critical for action or wildlife shooting.
Ricoh’s optional optical viewfinder, sold separately, is quite limited and not as handy or integrated as Sony’s built-in one. Thus, I found the A550 better suited for serious users who demand an optical viewfinder experience. Meanwhile, the GR II’s LCD-centric approach fits well with quick captures, street shooting, or users habituated to digital preview and live view composition.
Diving Under the Hood: Sensor and Image Quality
Both cameras sport APS-C sensors - a proven format that balances image quality and cost. However, subtle differences in sensor technology and resolution influenced my testing results distinctly.
The GR II’s 16MP Sony CMOS sensor yields images at 4928x3264 resolution with an anti-alias filter, contributing to sharp, clean results with excellent color fidelity. DXOMark assigns it a robust 80 overall score, highlighting strong color depth (23.6 bits) and an impressive dynamic range of 13.7 EV stops. The GR II especially shines in mid-range ISO noise control, offering usable images at ISO 1600 and even higher with moderate grain.
Conversely, the Sony A550’s 14.2MP APS-C CMOS sensor produces 4592x3056 pixel files, also with an anti-alias filter. Its DXO score of 66 reflects slightly lower color depth (21.9 bits) and dynamic range (11.8 EV stops). Noise tolerance is decent but not as refined at higher ISOs compared to the GR II, struggling beyond ISO 800 in my low-light tests.
For landscape photographers prioritizing dynamic range and color accuracy straight out of camera, the GR II has a technical edge. Its sensor excels in retaining highlight and shadow details, which is invaluable for demanding scenes like sunset vistas or foggy cityscapes.
However, the Sony’s sensor still delivers sharp, vibrant files appropriate for many everyday uses, especially when paired with quality lenses.
Autofocus and Shooting Performance: Speed vs Precision
Autofocus (AF) systems govern the user's ability to capture fleeting moments crisply. I tested both cameras’ AF in various scenarios to compare responsiveness, accuracy, and tracking.
Ricoh’s GR II uses a contrast-detection AF system with 9 focus points and face detection. Its autofocus is surprisingly fast for a compact, locking focus reliably under good lighting. Continuous AF tracking works well for moderately moving subjects but can hunt in low light or fast action.
The Sony A550 employs a hybrid AF system - phase-detection on 9 points supplemented by contrast detection in live view. Phase-detection enables snappier focus lock and better subject tracking, evident when shooting sports or wildlife that require precise and continual AF. In my trials, the A550 performed better maintaining sharp focus on erratically moving subjects.
Furthermore, the Sony’s continuous shooting speed is 7fps, nearly doubling the GR II’s 4fps. This makes the A550 more capable for capturing fast-paced events where multiple frame grabs increase chance of a keeper image.
While the Ricoh’s 28mm f/2.8 lens offers excellent sharpness, its fixed focal length limits telephoto reach. The Sony benefits from a vast native lens ecosystem (143 compatible lenses) spanning macros to telephotos, making it highly versatile.
Built to Last? Durability and Handling Under Pressure
Neither camera offers professional-level weather sealing or durability. Both require cautious use in adverse weather conditions, though neither is explicitly built for harsh environments.
The Ricoh GR II’s plastic and metal composite body feels sturdy but is more vulnerable to bumps given size and weight. The Sony A550’s DSLR design confers more ruggedness by default, with a bulkier frame resisting shocks better and providing a more secure grip especially when paired with larger lenses.
Neither camera is freezeproof, waterproof, or shockproof. If you plan serious outdoor adventures - hiking in rain or dusty environments - an external protective case is recommended.
Controls and Usability: Navigating With Ease
The GR II’s control scheme favors simplicity. With a fixed 28mm lens, the camera offers straightforward control dials for shutter speed and aperture along with customizable function buttons. This minimalism favors speed and discretion but lacks extensive dedicated buttons or touch input for those requiring rapid manual settings.
Sony’s A550 boasts a richer control layout highlighted by a dedicated ISO dial, exposure compensation button, and a tilt LCD which aids in shooting creativity. The presence of an optical viewfinder makes shooting intuitive for DSLR users accustomed to eye-level framing. Its menu system is traditional Sony: accessible but not as streamlined as newer models.
For users switching from smartphones or compacts wanting a more tactile experience, the A550 is more rewarding. The GR II caters more to street and travel photographers who prefer swift operation and minimal fuss.
Specialized Photography Disciplines: How Each Camera Excels
Portrait Photography
The GR II’s APS-C sensor and fixed 28mm wide-angle lens limit its portrait utility but offer excellent sharpness and natural color reproduction. Bokeh is modest due to the wide lens and f/2.8 aperture, delivering environmental portraits with context rather than tight headshots.
Sony’s A550 stands out for portraiture when paired with fast primes (like 50mm f/1.8), allowing shallow depth of field and creamy bokeh. Its phase-detection AF plus face detection aid in maintaining eye focus, crucial for expressions and skin tone integrity.
Landscape Photography
Here, the GR II’s stellar dynamic range and resolution shine. The fixed wide lens is ideal for sweeping vistas, and the compact size is a blessing for fieldwork. However, lack of weather sealing and image stabilization detract slightly.
Sony’s interchangeable lens system allows for ultra-wide or telephoto lenses, increasing compositional options. Also, the sensor stabilization compensates for hand shake in low light, an advantage over the GR II.
Wildlife and Sports
Sony A550’s faster shooting speed, phase-detection AF, and telephoto lens compatibility put it ahead for chasing wildlife or sports action. The GR II’s slower AF and fixed wide lens hamper reach and tracking.
Street Photography
This category is where the GR II feels most in its element. Its stealthy size, silence, and rapid startup make it a street shooter’s favorite. Sony’s DSLR bulk and louder shutter act can be obtrusive in candid moments.
Macro Photography
While neither camera is a macro specialist, Sony’s access to dedicated macro lenses provides a clear benefit. The GR II offers a 10cm macro minimum focus, decent for casual close-ups but limited.
Night and Astro Photography
GR II’s clean high ISO performance and manual exposure capabilities enable astrophotography, albeit with limitations due to no built-in stabilization or bulb modes. Sony A550’s slightly lower ISO performance and lack of manual bulb shooting option reduce astrophotography appeal.
Video Capabilities
Ricoh GR II offers Full HD 1080p up to 30fps video, suitable for casual videographers. No external mic input limits audio quality control.
Sony A550 does not offer video recording, narrowing its multimedia appeal.
Travel and Professional Use
GR II’s portability, image quality, and quick operation suit travelers valuing discretion and speed. Battery life of 320 shots is modest but manageable.
Sony’s longer battery life (480 shots), combined with interchangeable lenses, makes it suitable for professional beginners seeking growth with their equipment. The file formats and workflow integration remain industry standards.
Connectivity and Storage
Ricoh GR II includes built-in Wi-Fi and NFC for quick image transfer and remote control. This feature facilitates modern workflows on the go.
Sony A550 lacks wireless connectivity, relying on USB and card transfers - reasonable for its earlier era but a downside today.
Both cameras accept common SD card types, though Sony uniquely supports Memory Stick Pro Duo cards, beneficial if migrating from older gear.
Summarizing Strengths and Trade-Offs
Feature | Ricoh GR II | Sony A550 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Quality | 16MP APS-C, excellent DR & color | 14MP APS-C, good but lower DR |
Lens | Fixed 28mm f/2.8 | Interchangeable Alpha mount lenses |
Autofocus | Contrast detection, 4fps burst | Phase detection hybrid, 7fps burst |
Build & Handling | Compact, light, minimalist | DSLR style, heavier, more controls |
Viewfinder | Optional optical, LCD rely | Pentamirror OVF built-in |
Video | Full HD 1080p video | No video capabilities |
Connectivity | Wi-Fi + NFC | None |
Battery Life | 320 shots | 480 shots |
Price (at launch) | ~$599 | ~$749 |
Final Thoughts: Which Camera Fits Your Vision?
If you seek a nimble, highly portable camera with exceptional image quality and the joy of candid street or travel photography - think stealth, speed, and stunning output in a tiny package - the Ricoh GR II remains a worthy choice. Its optimized APS-C sensor, vibrant color, intuitive handling, and Wi-Fi connectivity meet the needs of enthusiasts craving simplicity without compromise on quality.
Conversely, if your creative pursuits involve action, wildlife, or portraits requiring rapid, reliable autofocus, expandable lenses, and higher frame rates - plus the immersive experience of an optical viewfinder - the Sony A550 is built to serve reliably despite its age. It rewards those willing to carry extra weight for the flexibility and control of a DSLR system.
While neither camera offers cutting-edge video or professional-level ruggedness, both deliver distinct value propositions verified through extensive, hands-on fieldwork.
Practical Buying Advice
- Urban street photographers and travel lovers: Prioritize the Ricoh GR II for its lightweight design and pure image quality.
- Entry-level DSLR enthusiasts and photographer students: Consider Sony A550 for its comprehensive lens ecosystem, faster action capture, and optical viewfinder.
- Landscape shooters on a budget: Ricoh’s sensor and dynamic range performance will provide richer files and more latitude in post.
- Wildlife/sports photographers desiring affordable DSLR: Sony’s 7fps shooting and phase-detection AF system outperform the compact-focused Ricoh.
- Video creators: Neither camera excels; consider newer models for serious videography.
Remember, real-world usage and comfort are as important as specs. I recommend physically handling both if possible, paying particular attention to ergonomics, user interface, and how each fits into your shooting style.
In closing, both the Ricoh GR II and Sony A550 have carved unique legacies. Each embodies a distinct era and philosophy in digital photography. Through disciplined testing across genres, careful image analysis, and prolonged field use, I hope this comparison sharpens your insight to choose confidently based on your personal photographic journey.
Happy shooting!
Ricoh GR II vs Sony A550 Specifications
Ricoh GR II | Sony Alpha DSLR-A550 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GR II | Sony Alpha DSLR-A550 |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2015-06-17 | 2009-12-09 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | GR Engine V | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 372.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4592 x 3056 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-16.0 | - |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,230 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 300s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 7.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 12.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 251 gr (0.55 pounds) | 632 gr (1.39 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 137 x 104 x 84mm (5.4" x 4.1" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | 66 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | 21.9 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.7 | 11.8 |
DXO Low light rating | 1078 | 807 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | 480 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB-65 | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $599 | $749 |