Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX100V
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
95 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX100V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Launched June 2015
- Succeeded the Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 147g - 97 x 59 x 18mm
- Revealed January 2011
Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX100V Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Ricoh GR II and Sony TX100V, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the GR II (16MP) and the TX100V (16MP) is fairly comparable but the GR II (APS-C) and TX100V (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe GR II was announced 4 years later than the TX100V and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony TX100V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short summation of how the GR II grades vs the TX100V for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX100V Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR II & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100V. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh GR II Gallery & Sony TX100V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Sony TX100V
GR II | TX100V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2015 | January 2011 | Fresher by 55 months | |
Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
Display resolution | 1230k | 1229k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony TX100V over the Ricoh GR II
TX100V | GR II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR II and Sony TX100V
GR II | TX100V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX100V Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR II offers physical dimensions of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") having a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs) whilst the Sony TX100V has proportions of 97mm x 59mm x 18mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GR II and Sony TX100V in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at that moment. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the GR II vs the TX100V.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the GR II and TX100V is 89 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX100V Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to see the gap in sensor sizing only by seeing specs. The photograph here might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the GR II and TX100V.
All in all, both of these cameras feature the identical resolution but not the same sensor sizing. The GR II offers the larger sensor which will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult. The newer GR II will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX100V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX100V Specifications
Ricoh GR II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GR II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100V |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2015-06-17 | 2011-01-06 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | GR Engine V | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 372.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-16.0 | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,230 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | XtraFine OLED display with TruBlack technology |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 300s | 2s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 251 grams (0.55 lb) | 147 grams (0.32 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 97 x 59 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1078 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB-65 | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $599 | $380 |