Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ35W
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2018
- Replaced the Ricoh GR III
- Successor is Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Alternate Name is WB650
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Lets look more closely at the Ricoh GR III and Samsung HZ35W, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and HZ35W (12MP) and the GR III (APS-C) and HZ35W (1/2.3") use totally different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe GR III was brought out 8 years later than the HZ35W and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.
Before going through a full comparison, below is a concise overview of how the GR III matches up vs the HZ35W in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR III & Samsung HZ35W. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR III Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Samsung HZ35W
GR III | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2018 | June 2010 | More recent by 101 months | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 614k | Clearer display (+423k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Ricoh GR III
HZ35W | GR III |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Samsung HZ35W
GR III | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR III comes with outside dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ35W has sizing of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh GR III and Samsung HZ35W in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the GR III against the HZ35W.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the GR III and HZ35W is 90 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to visualise the gap in sensor measurements purely by looking through specs. The graphic here will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR III and HZ35W.
All in all, the 2 cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The GR III featuring a larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Ricoh GR III will result in greater detail having its extra 12MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images much more aggressively. The younger GR III will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
Ricoh GR III | Samsung HZ35W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GR III | Samsung HZ35W |
Otherwise known as | - | WB650 |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2018-09-25 | 2010-06-16 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 102400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-16 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 6cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 16 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 257g (0.57 lb) | 245g (0.54 lb) |
Dimensions | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $900 | $300 |