Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung TL240
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Released November 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Announced January 2010
- Alternative Name is ST5000
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung TL240 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro versus Samsung TL240, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the TL240 (14MP) is very close but the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) and TL240 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was manufactured very close to the TL240 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief summation of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro scores versus the TL240 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung TL240. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery and Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Samsung TL240
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | TL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
TL240 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung TL240
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | TL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | November 2009 | January 2010 | Same generation | |
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has got outer dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") having a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL240 has measurements of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro versus Samsung TL240 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro versus the TL240.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and TL240 is 77 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizing only by viewing technical specs. The photograph underneath might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and TL240.
As you can tell, both cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Samsung TL240 will result in extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos much more aggressively.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung TL240 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung TL240 |
Also referred to as | - | ST5000 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Released | 2009-11-10 | 2010-01-06 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4334 x 3256 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 4800 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 50mm (1x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.5 | f/3.3-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 180 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 453 grams (1.00 lb) | 160 grams (0.35 lb) |
Dimensions | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 shots | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $566 | $171 |