Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB150F
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0919f/0919f1115fdda8c239848792f287f46b2d1eed67" alt="Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/999d5/999d5267cbeeded12e1c296ab2c2e623b4be3f06" alt="Samsung WB150F front Samsung WB150F front"
93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Revealed November 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB150F Overview
In this article, we will be comparing the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro versus Samsung WB150F, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the WB150F (14MP) is pretty close but the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) and WB150F (1/2.3") feature different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was introduced 3 years earlier than the WB150F which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB150F being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a in depth comparison, below is a brief summary of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro scores vs the WB150F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro & Samsung WB150F. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery & Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Samsung WB150F
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | WB150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
WB150F | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2012 | ![]() | November 2009 | More modern by 26 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung WB150F
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | WB150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch screen |
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro features outer measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) and the Samsung WB150F has proportions of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro versus Samsung WB150F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro compared to the WB150F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0fa5e/0fa5e7fa73dc4c0e6379a4ee9331211063461d8e" alt="Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB150F size comparison Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB150F size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and WB150F is 77 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58953/58953f865b50557b28022cc2b001c004dbd56f66" alt="Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB150F top view buttons comparison Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB150F top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to visualize the gap in sensor sizes purely by researching specifications. The image here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and WB150F.
To sum up, the two cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Samsung WB150F will render extra detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0c548/0c548930ec194132f2c9baa392ff5395ee8d3be4" alt="Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB150F sensor size comparison Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB150F sensor size comparison"
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0acc/f0accce0e23214e36a2393db8dc687083bf6244e" alt="Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung WB150F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung WB150F |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-11-10 | 2012-01-09 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 50mm (1x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 920k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 180 secs | 16 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 3.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 453 gr (1.00 pounds) | 188 gr (0.41 pounds) |
Dimensions | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 pictures | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $566 | $230 |