Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB210
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Launched November 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2011
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB210, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is fairly close but the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) and WB210 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was brought out 20 months before the WB210 making them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB210 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a short view of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro scores versus the WB210 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro & Samsung WB210. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery & Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Samsung WB210
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | WB210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 1k | Sharper display (+919k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
WB210 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2011 | November 2009 | Fresher by 20 months | |
Display size | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung WB210
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | WB210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has got outside measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) while the Samsung WB210 has dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB210 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro versus the WB210.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and WB210 is 77 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to envision the gap in sensor sizing only by looking through technical specs. The graphic below will give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and WB210.
As you have seen, both of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro due to its larger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Samsung WB210 will render extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos way more aggressively. The older GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung WB210 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Samsung WB210 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2009-11-10 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | GR engine III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 50mm (1x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 1 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 180 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 3.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 453 gr (1.00 lbs) | 174 gr (0.38 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $566 | $279 |