Clicky

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB210

Portability
77
Imaging
52
Features
31
Overall
43
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front
 
Samsung WB210 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
45
Overall
40

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 50mm (F2.5) lens
  • 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
  • Launched November 2009
Samsung WB210
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
  • 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
  • Revealed July 2011
Photography Glossary

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB210 Overview

Here, we are looking at the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB210, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is fairly close but the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) and WB210 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was brought out 20 months before the WB210 making them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB210 being a Compact camera.

Before going right into a full comparison, here is a short view of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro scores versus the WB210 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Samsung WB210

 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro WB210 
Display resolution920k1kSharper display (+919k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 WB210 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
RevealedJuly 2011November 2009Fresher by 20 months
Display size3.5"3"Larger display (+0.5")
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung WB210

 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro WB210 
Focus manually Very exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison

When you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has got outside measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) while the Samsung WB210 has dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).

Contrast the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB210 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro versus the WB210.

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB210 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and WB210 is 77 and 94 respectively.

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB210 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very tough to envision the gap in sensor sizing only by looking through technical specs. The graphic below will give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and WB210.

As you have seen, both of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro due to its larger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Samsung WB210 will render extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos way more aggressively. The older GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB210 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB210 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Portrait photography details
Samsung WB210 Portrait photography details
55
focusing manually
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
no liveview feature
MP count low (12MP)
39
manual focus
decent MP (14 megapixels)
supports face detection autofocus
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro as a Street photography camera
Samsung WB210 as a Street photography camera
62
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
66
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with touch to focus
lighter than competitors (174 grams)
screen is fixed
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sports photography details
Samsung WB210 Sports photography details
32
good sensor size (APS-C)
fixed focal length (50mm)
no liveview feature
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (12 megapixels)
not so great battery pack (320 shots)
no phase detect auto focus
38
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Travel photography advice
Samsung WB210 Travel photography advice
49
flash built-in
not so great battery pack (320 shots)
MP count low (12MP)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
71
lighter than competitors (174g)
comes with touch to focus
decent MP (14MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (24mm)
long reach (288mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Landscape photography factors
Samsung WB210 Landscape photography factors
46
focusing manually
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (50mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
no liveview feature
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (12 megapixels)
not so great battery pack (320 per charge)
46
manual focus
rather wide (24mm)
lovely big screen (3.5")
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
no manual exposure
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
does not have Time Lapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
Vlogging with Samsung WB210
20
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing mic socket
33
rather wide (24mm)
touchscreen capability
image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detection autofocus
lighter than competitors (174 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have external mic support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB210 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung WB210
 Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 MacroSamsung WB210
General Information
Company Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Samsung WB210
Class Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2009-11-10 2011-07-19
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Chip GR engine III -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 23.6 x 15.7mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 370.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4288 x 2848 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 3200 1600
Maximum enhanced ISO - 3200
Minimum native ISO 200 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 50mm (1x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.5 f/2.9-5.9
Macro focusing distance 1cm 5cm
Crop factor 1.5 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 3.5 inch
Resolution of screen 920 thousand dots 1 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 180 secs 8 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/3200 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 3.50 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 453 gr (1.00 lbs) 174 gr (0.38 lbs)
Physical dimensions 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 320 photographs -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal microSC/SDHC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Price at release $566 $279