Clicky

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB750

Portability
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front
 
Samsung WB750 front
Portability
93 Imaging
37 Features
50 Overall
42

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 50mm (F2.5) lens
  • 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
  • Launched November 2009
Samsung WB750
(Full Review)
  • 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
  • Announced September 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB750 Overview

Following is a in-depth comparison of the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB750, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the WB750 (13MP) is pretty close but the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) and WB750 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was announced 22 months earlier than the WB750 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB750 being a Compact camera.

Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro matches up versus the WB750 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Samsung WB750

		

		

			
 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro WB750 
Screen resolution920k460kCrisper screen (+460k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

		

		

			
 WB750 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
AnnouncedSeptember 2011November 2009More modern by 22 months
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung WB750

		

		

			
 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro WB750 
Focus manually  More exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen size
Selfie screen  Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly screen  Neither offers Touch friendly screen
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison

		

		

			
In case you're going to carry around your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and size. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro offers physical dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) and the Samsung WB750 has specifications of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB750 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro against the WB750.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB750 size comparison
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and WB750 is 77 and 93 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB750 top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Usually, it is very tough to envision the difference in sensor sizes simply by researching specs. The picture here will help provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and WB750.
As you can plainly see, both cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro using its bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Samsung WB750 will result in more detail with its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
	
			Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB750 sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB750 Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Portrait photography highlights
Samsung WB750 Portrait photography highlights
55
 focusing manually
 decent sensor size (APS-C)
 supports RAW formats
 no liveview
 sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
42
 has manual focus
 resolution is good (13MP)
 comes with face detection focus
 cannot use external flash
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Street Comparison
 Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro as a Street photography camera
 Samsung WB750 as a Street photography camera
62
 decent sensor size (APS-C)
 supports RAW formats
 no articulating screen
 lack of image stabilization
62
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 lighter than competition (193g)
 no moving screen
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 no RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Sports Comparison
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sports photography details
Samsung WB750 Sports photography details
32
 decent sensor size (APS-C)
 can't change focal length (50mm)
 no liveview
 very slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
 lack of image stabilization
 sensor resolution low (12MP)
 not so great battery pack (320 per charge)
 has no phase detect autofocus
51
 excellent zoom range (24-432mm  18.0 x zoom)
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 resolution is good (13MP)
 comes with tracking autofocus
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 no phase detect auto focus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Travel Comparison
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Travel photography highlights
Samsung WB750 Travel photography highlights
49
 built-in flash
 not so great battery pack (320 per charge)
 sensor resolution low (12MP)
 display is not selfie friendly
 slow max aperture (f2.5)
69
 lighter than competition (193g)
 resolution is good (13 megapixels)
 has built in flash
 fairly wide (24mm)
 very long reach (432mm)
 no Timelapse mode
 display is not selfie friendly
 sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Landscape Comparison
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Landscape photography factors
Samsung WB750 Landscape photography factors
46
 focusing manually
 pretty good screen size (3")
 decent sensor size (APS-C)
 supports RAW formats
 can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
 can't change focal length (50mm)
 slow max aperture (f2.5)
 no liveview
 lack of image stabilization
 sensor resolution low (12MP)
 not so great battery pack (320 per charge)
49
 has manual focus
 fairly wide (24mm)
 good sized screen (3")
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 resolution is good (13 megapixels)
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 no RAW files
 no Timelapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Vlogging info
Samsung WB750 Vlogging info
20
 slow max aperture (f2.5)
 display is not selfie friendly
 lack of image stabilization
 low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
 no mic port
34
 fairly wide (24mm)
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 comes with face detection focus
 great video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
 lighter than competition (193g)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
 display is not selfie friendly
 no external microphone port
Photography Glossary
	

		

			
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Samsung WB750 Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Samsung WB750
 Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 MacroSamsung WB750
General Information
Brand Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Samsung WB750
Type Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2009-11-10 2011-09-01
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Chip GR engine III -
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 23.6 x 15.7mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 370.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 13MP
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 4:3 and  16:9
Maximum resolution 4288 x 2848 4096 x 3072
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW support    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Touch focus    
Continuous autofocus    
Autofocus single    
Autofocus tracking    
Selective autofocus    
Autofocus center weighted    
Autofocus multi area    
Autofocus live view    
Face detect focus    
Contract detect focus    
Phase detect focus    
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 50mm (1x) 24-432mm (18.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.5 f/3.2-5.8
Macro focusing distance 1cm 5cm
Crop factor 1.5 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 920 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch operation    
Display tech - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 180 seconds 8 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/3200 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per second 10.0 frames per second
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manually set exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance    
Image stabilization    
Inbuilt flash    
Flash distance 3.00 m 3.30 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe    
AEB    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment    
Average    
Spot    
Partial    
AF area    
Center weighted    
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack    
Headphone jack    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 453g (1.00 lb) 193g (0.43 lb)
Dimensions 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 320 shots -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID - SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature    
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Retail price $566 $339