Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony NEX-3N
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
89 Imaging
57 Features
52 Overall
55
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony NEX-3N Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Launched November 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
- Revealed February 2013
- Succeeded the Sony NEX-F3
- Later Model is Sony a5000
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony NEX-3N Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Sony NEX-3N, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and NEX-3N (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor dimensions (APS-C).
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was announced 4 years earlier than the NEX-3N and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a short overview of how the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro scores against the NEX-3N in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony NEX-3N Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro & Sony Alpha NEX-3N. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery & Sony NEX-3N Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Sony NEX-3N
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | NEX-3N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
NEX-3N | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2013 | November 2009 | Fresher by 40 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Sony NEX-3N
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | NEX-3N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony NEX-3N Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro offers exterior measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs) while the Sony NEX-3N has sizing of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and Sony NEX-3N in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro versus the NEX-3N.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and NEX-3N is 77 and 89 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony NEX-3N Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizing just by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and NEX-3N.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You can anticipate the Sony NEX-3N to provide you with greater detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images much more aggressively. The older GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony NEX-3N Specifications
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Sony Alpha NEX-3N | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Sony Alpha NEX-3N |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2009-11-10 | 2013-02-25 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | GR engine III | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4912 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 16000 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 50mm (1x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/2.5 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 920k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 180 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 4.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 453 grams (1.00 pounds) | 269 grams (0.59 pounds) |
Dimensions | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") | 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 74 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1067 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 pictures | 480 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $566 | $399 |