Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL240
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Launched February 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Also referred to as ST5000
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL240 Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus Samsung TL240, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and the TL240 (14MP) is fairly well matched but the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) and TL240 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 was brought out 2 years after the TL240 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short overview of how the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 scores versus the TL240 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung TL240. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery and Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Samsung TL240
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | TL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2012 | January 2010 | Newer by 26 months | |
Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
TL240 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung TL240
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | TL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 features outside measurements of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs) while the Samsung TL240 has proportions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus Samsung TL240 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using at the time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 compared to the TL240.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and TL240 is 69 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to envision the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reading through technical specs. The picture here will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and TL240.
As you have seen, both the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 because of its larger sensor will make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will give more detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The newer GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | Samsung TL240 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | Samsung TL240 |
Also called | - | ST5000 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2012-02-02 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 370.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4334 x 3256 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 4800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-85mm (3.5x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.3-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 180 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 550 grams (1.21 lbs) | 160 grams (0.35 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 400 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB-90 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $871 | $171 |