Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB700
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
98 Imaging
37 Features
21 Overall
30
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Launched February 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched December 2010
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB700 Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus Samsung WB700, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and the WB700 (14MP) is relatively close but the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) and WB700 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizes.
Photography GlossaryThe GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 was introduced 14 months after the WB700 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB700 being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 scores vs the WB700 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB700 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 & Samsung WB700. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery & Samsung WB700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Samsung WB700
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | WB700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2012 | December 2010 | Newer by 14 months | |
Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Screen resolution | 920k | 614k | Sharper screen (+306k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
WB700 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and Samsung WB700
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | WB700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB700 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 offers outer measurements of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB700 has proportions of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 versus Samsung WB700 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and the WB700.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and WB700 is 69 and 98 respectively.
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB700 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to envision the difference in sensor dimensions merely by looking through specifications. The picture underneath might offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and WB700.
Plainly, each of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 using its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will result in greater detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The fresher GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will have an edge in sensor tech.
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB700 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 vs Samsung WB700 Specifications
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | Samsung WB700 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | Samsung WB700 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-02-02 | 2010-12-28 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | - |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-85mm (3.5x) | () |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 180s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 550 gr (1.21 pounds) | - |
Dimensions | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 400 photos | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB-90 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $871 | $300 |