Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB150F
88 Imaging
52 Features
37 Overall
46
93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28mm (F2.5) lens
- 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
- Revealed September 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB150F Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB150F, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) and the WB150F (14MP) is pretty comparable but the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) and WB150F (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 was announced 15 months before the WB150F which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB150F being a Compact camera.
Before going through a in depth comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 grades versus the WB150F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 & Samsung WB150F. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery & Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Samsung WB150F
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | WB150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
WB150F | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2012 | September 2010 | Fresher by 15 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and Samsung WB150F
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | WB150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 has outside dimensions of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs) and the Samsung WB150F has dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB150F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and the WB150F.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and WB150F is 88 and 93 respectively.
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizing merely by checking out specs. The graphic here will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and WB150F.
All in all, each of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 using its bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF easier and the Samsung WB150F will provide more detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures much more aggressively. The older GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | Samsung WB150F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | Samsung WB150F |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2010-09-21 | 2012-01-09 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | GR Engine III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 920k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 180 secs | 16 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 140g (0.31 lb) | 188g (0.41 lb) |
Dimensions | 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 shots | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB-90 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $566 | $230 |